一项比较左炔诺孕酮宫内系统(LNG IUS)和经宫颈子宫内膜切除术(TCRE)治疗月经过多的随机研究:初步结果

Nina Kittelsen, Olav Istre
{"title":"一项比较左炔诺孕酮宫内系统(LNG IUS)和经宫颈子宫内膜切除术(TCRE)治疗月经过多的随机研究:初步结果","authors":"Nina Kittelsen,&nbsp;Olav Istre","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2508.1998.00165.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To identify the effect of the levonorgestrel coil (Mirena; LNG IUS) vs. transcervical resection of the endometrium (TCRE) for treatment of menorrhagia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A randomized study of 60 patients performed at a gynaecological clinic specializing in operative hysteroscopy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>24 patients in the LNG IUS group and 29 patients in the TCRE group completed 20 months of follow up. In the TCRE group one patient refused to continue after the result of randomization. Reasons for discontinuation in the LNG IUS group included abdominal pain (2), acne (1) and bleeding or continuous spotting (3). The bleeding intensity was assessed using the PBAC score and was reduced in both groups, from 418 to 42 in the LNG IUS group, and from 378 to 6.6 in the TCRE group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Both methods have a dramatic effect on bleeding intensity and furthermore the LNG IUS is reversible and has no operative hazards or side-effects.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100599,"journal":{"name":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","volume":"7 2","pages":"61-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2508.1998.00165.x","citationCount":"62","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A randomized study comparing levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG IUS) and transcervical resection of the endometrium (TCRE) in the treatment of menorrhagia: preliminary results\",\"authors\":\"Nina Kittelsen,&nbsp;Olav Istre\",\"doi\":\"10.1046/j.1365-2508.1998.00165.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To identify the effect of the levonorgestrel coil (Mirena; LNG IUS) vs. transcervical resection of the endometrium (TCRE) for treatment of menorrhagia.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>A randomized study of 60 patients performed at a gynaecological clinic specializing in operative hysteroscopy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>24 patients in the LNG IUS group and 29 patients in the TCRE group completed 20 months of follow up. In the TCRE group one patient refused to continue after the result of randomization. Reasons for discontinuation in the LNG IUS group included abdominal pain (2), acne (1) and bleeding or continuous spotting (3). The bleeding intensity was assessed using the PBAC score and was reduced in both groups, from 418 to 42 in the LNG IUS group, and from 378 to 6.6 in the TCRE group.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Both methods have a dramatic effect on bleeding intensity and furthermore the LNG IUS is reversible and has no operative hazards or side-effects.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynaecological Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"61-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2508.1998.00165.x\",\"citationCount\":\"62\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynaecological Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2508.1998.00165.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2508.1998.00165.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 62

摘要

目的探讨左炔诺孕酮卷管(mrena;LNG IUS)与经宫颈子宫内膜切除术(TCRE)治疗月经过多。设计一项随机研究,60例患者在妇科诊所进行手术宫腔镜检查。结果LNG IUS组24例,TCRE组29例,随访20个月。在TCRE组中,1例患者在随机化结果后拒绝继续。LNG IUS组停药的原因包括腹痛(2)、痤疮(1)和出血或持续点滴(3)。使用PBAC评分评估出血强度,两组的出血强度均有所降低,LNG IUS组从418降至42,TCRE组从378降至6.6。结论两种方法均可显著降低出血强度,且LNG IUS具有可逆性,无手术危害和副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A randomized study comparing levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG IUS) and transcervical resection of the endometrium (TCRE) in the treatment of menorrhagia: preliminary results

Objective

To identify the effect of the levonorgestrel coil (Mirena; LNG IUS) vs. transcervical resection of the endometrium (TCRE) for treatment of menorrhagia.

Design

A randomized study of 60 patients performed at a gynaecological clinic specializing in operative hysteroscopy.

Results

24 patients in the LNG IUS group and 29 patients in the TCRE group completed 20 months of follow up. In the TCRE group one patient refused to continue after the result of randomization. Reasons for discontinuation in the LNG IUS group included abdominal pain (2), acne (1) and bleeding or continuous spotting (3). The bleeding intensity was assessed using the PBAC score and was reduced in both groups, from 418 to 42 in the LNG IUS group, and from 378 to 6.6 in the TCRE group.

Conclusion

Both methods have a dramatic effect on bleeding intensity and furthermore the LNG IUS is reversible and has no operative hazards or side-effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microendoscopy in the operating room†: author's reply Broken needle tip in Cooper's ligament: high occurrence rate with the EndostitchTM suturing device† Ray Garry's reply to Prof. Dr Rudnicki's letter Reply to Jones Images of endometriosis: an interactive CD-ROM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1