工会与道德经济:1983-2018年工会衰落与收入不平等加剧之间的文化路径调查

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Research in Social Stratification and Mobility Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rssm.2023.100848
Shawn Perron
{"title":"工会与道德经济:1983-2018年工会衰落与收入不平等加剧之间的文化路径调查","authors":"Shawn Perron","doi":"10.1016/j.rssm.2023.100848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Declines in union density explain a considerable portion of rising US inequality among unionized and non-unionized workers. However, how union density regulates non-union wages is mainly speculative. I test the moral economy hypothesis that union density reduces inequality, in part, by fostering egalitarian wage norms that regulate compensation practices and redistributive policies. Variance function regressions suggest that wage norms may explain 12% of union density decline effects on rising within-group wage inequality between 1983 and 2018. Findings provide support for the moral economy perspective and an empirical foundation for the causal relationship between unions and inequality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47384,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 100848"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unions and moral economies: An investigation into cultural pathways linking union decline to rising income inequality, 1983–2018\",\"authors\":\"Shawn Perron\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rssm.2023.100848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Declines in union density explain a considerable portion of rising US inequality among unionized and non-unionized workers. However, how union density regulates non-union wages is mainly speculative. I test the moral economy hypothesis that union density reduces inequality, in part, by fostering egalitarian wage norms that regulate compensation practices and redistributive policies. Variance function regressions suggest that wage norms may explain 12% of union density decline effects on rising within-group wage inequality between 1983 and 2018. Findings provide support for the moral economy perspective and an empirical foundation for the causal relationship between unions and inequality.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility\",\"volume\":\"87 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100848\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0276562423000926\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0276562423000926","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

工会密度的下降在很大程度上解释了美国加入工会和非工会工人之间不平等加剧的原因。然而,工会密度如何调节非工会工资主要是推测性的。我测试了道德经济学假设,即工会密度减少不平等,部分原因是通过培养平等主义的工资标准来规范薪酬做法和再分配政策。方差函数回归表明,工资标准可以解释1983年至2018年间工会密度下降对群体内工资不平等加剧的12%的影响。研究结果为道德经济学视角提供了支持,并为工会与不平等之间的因果关系提供了实证基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unions and moral economies: An investigation into cultural pathways linking union decline to rising income inequality, 1983–2018

Declines in union density explain a considerable portion of rising US inequality among unionized and non-unionized workers. However, how union density regulates non-union wages is mainly speculative. I test the moral economy hypothesis that union density reduces inequality, in part, by fostering egalitarian wage norms that regulate compensation practices and redistributive policies. Variance function regressions suggest that wage norms may explain 12% of union density decline effects on rising within-group wage inequality between 1983 and 2018. Findings provide support for the moral economy perspective and an empirical foundation for the causal relationship between unions and inequality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The study of social inequality is and has been one of the central preoccupations of social scientists. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility is dedicated to publishing the highest, most innovative research on issues of social inequality from a broad diversity of theoretical and methodological perspectives. The journal is also dedicated to cutting edge summaries of prior research and fruitful exchanges that will stimulate future research on issues of social inequality. The study of social inequality is and has been one of the central preoccupations of social scientists.
期刊最新文献
The distribution of privately held business assets in the United States The U-turn in educational inequality. Why a multidimensional approach matters for measuring social inequalities in tertiary educational attainment Intergenerational poverty persistence in Europe – Is there a ‘Great Gatsby Curve’ for poverty? Beauty pays, but not under all circumstances: Evidence on gendered hiring discrimination from a novel experimental treatment using deepfakes Earnings mobility across three generations of natives in Finland: A comparison of Finnish and Swedish speakers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1