协同知识建构中的教师脚手架与公平

Elizabeth Kraatz , Tzu-Jung Lin, Manisha Nagpal , Lynley Anderman
{"title":"协同知识建构中的教师脚手架与公平","authors":"Elizabeth Kraatz ,&nbsp;Tzu-Jung Lin,&nbsp;Manisha Nagpal ,&nbsp;Lynley Anderman","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines teacher scaffolding and equity during collaborative small-group discussions in fifth-grade English language arts classrooms. Equity indicators analyzed include uptake, relational invitations, and conflicts for the floor (CFF). CFF indicates lower levels of participatory equity, while the others indicate higher relational equity. Three types of teacher scaffolding moves were included, and data were analyzed using statistical discourse analysis and repeated measures logistic regression. Teacher scaffolding was either negatively or not related to all equity indicators. Specifically, teacher scaffolding is associated with reduced indicators of relational equity, but also with reductions in CFF. The relationship with relational equity was stronger and more consistent than the relationship with CFF, suggesting that teachers’ largest influence on equity is on relational, rather than participatory, equity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73445,"journal":{"name":"International journal of educational research open","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266637402300081X/pdfft?md5=3bb5091de972b721b3e57b680162690b&pid=1-s2.0-S266637402300081X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teacher Scaffolding and Equity in Collaborative Knowledge Construction\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Kraatz ,&nbsp;Tzu-Jung Lin,&nbsp;Manisha Nagpal ,&nbsp;Lynley Anderman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study examines teacher scaffolding and equity during collaborative small-group discussions in fifth-grade English language arts classrooms. Equity indicators analyzed include uptake, relational invitations, and conflicts for the floor (CFF). CFF indicates lower levels of participatory equity, while the others indicate higher relational equity. Three types of teacher scaffolding moves were included, and data were analyzed using statistical discourse analysis and repeated measures logistic regression. Teacher scaffolding was either negatively or not related to all equity indicators. Specifically, teacher scaffolding is associated with reduced indicators of relational equity, but also with reductions in CFF. The relationship with relational equity was stronger and more consistent than the relationship with CFF, suggesting that teachers’ largest influence on equity is on relational, rather than participatory, equity.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of educational research open\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100306\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266637402300081X/pdfft?md5=3bb5091de972b721b3e57b680162690b&pid=1-s2.0-S266637402300081X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of educational research open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266637402300081X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of educational research open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266637402300081X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨五年级英语语言艺术课堂合作小组讨论中的教师框架与公平。所分析的公平指标包括吸收、关系邀请和底层冲突(CFF)。CFF表明参与性公平水平较低,而其他指标表明关系公平水平较高。采用统计语篇分析和重复测量逻辑回归对三种类型的教师脚手架行为进行数据分析。教师脚手架与所有公平指标呈负相关或不相关。具体而言,教师脚手架与关系公平指标的降低有关,但也与CFF的降低有关。与关系公平的关系比与CFF的关系更强,更一致,这表明教师对公平的最大影响是关系公平,而不是参与公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Teacher Scaffolding and Equity in Collaborative Knowledge Construction

This study examines teacher scaffolding and equity during collaborative small-group discussions in fifth-grade English language arts classrooms. Equity indicators analyzed include uptake, relational invitations, and conflicts for the floor (CFF). CFF indicates lower levels of participatory equity, while the others indicate higher relational equity. Three types of teacher scaffolding moves were included, and data were analyzed using statistical discourse analysis and repeated measures logistic regression. Teacher scaffolding was either negatively or not related to all equity indicators. Specifically, teacher scaffolding is associated with reduced indicators of relational equity, but also with reductions in CFF. The relationship with relational equity was stronger and more consistent than the relationship with CFF, suggesting that teachers’ largest influence on equity is on relational, rather than participatory, equity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Navigating the virtual landscape: A systematic review of approaches to cultivating a sense of community among distance learners in health and allied health disciplines Approaching a substantive theory of moral reckoning in special education leadership: Innovative grounded theory methods using extant data on principals An assessment of the Education Management Information System in Sierra Leone and potential for enhanced disability inclusiveness AI chatbots: A disguised enemy for academic integrity? The role of students’ perceived teacher support in student motivation: A longitudinal study of student motivation profiles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1