治疗师和来访者对工作联盟的看法:共同发展、线性增长、可变性和来访者功能。

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Journal of Counseling Psychology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-13 DOI:10.1037/cou0000715
Shihong Lin, Dennis M Kivlighan, Clara E Hill
{"title":"治疗师和来访者对工作联盟的看法:共同发展、线性增长、可变性和来访者功能。","authors":"Shihong Lin, Dennis M Kivlighan, Clara E Hill","doi":"10.1037/cou0000715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using longitudinal client and therapist working alliance ratings, previous research examined how alliance: average value, linear growth, variability, stability (autocorrelation), and partner responsiveness were associated with client outcome. However, no research simultaneously examined all of these dimensions. Omitting important variables in analyses could lead to overestimation of related effects. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine these effects simultaneously. Therapists (<i>N</i> = 45) and clients (<i>N</i> = 236) rated alliance after every session (<i>N</i> = 10,720) and clients completed a measure of psychological distress after every eighth session. We used dynamic structure equation modeling to model longitudinal ratings using the longitudinal actor-partner interaction and location-scale models. Across sessions, there were significant linear growth and significant variability in client and therapist alliance ratings. The variability indicates multiple \"V\" patterns, which have been associated with alliance ruptures. Both actor effects were significant, showing session-to-session stability for client and therapist alliance. In addition, client-partner effect was significant, indicating higher-than-usual client alliance in a session predicting an increase in therapist alliance in the subsequent session. Growth in neither client-rated nor therapist-rated working alliances was significantly associated with client improvement. Lower variabilities (fewer fluctuations) in both client- and therapist-rated working alliances were associated with better outcomes. Higher therapist-actor and partner effects were associated with client improvement, but client-actor and partner effects were not associated with client improvement. Average working alliances were not associated with client improvement. Implications for practice and research were discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapist and client perceptions of the working alliance: Codevelopment, linear growth, variability, and client functioning.\",\"authors\":\"Shihong Lin, Dennis M Kivlighan, Clara E Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/cou0000715\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Using longitudinal client and therapist working alliance ratings, previous research examined how alliance: average value, linear growth, variability, stability (autocorrelation), and partner responsiveness were associated with client outcome. However, no research simultaneously examined all of these dimensions. Omitting important variables in analyses could lead to overestimation of related effects. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine these effects simultaneously. Therapists (<i>N</i> = 45) and clients (<i>N</i> = 236) rated alliance after every session (<i>N</i> = 10,720) and clients completed a measure of psychological distress after every eighth session. We used dynamic structure equation modeling to model longitudinal ratings using the longitudinal actor-partner interaction and location-scale models. Across sessions, there were significant linear growth and significant variability in client and therapist alliance ratings. The variability indicates multiple \\\"V\\\" patterns, which have been associated with alliance ruptures. Both actor effects were significant, showing session-to-session stability for client and therapist alliance. In addition, client-partner effect was significant, indicating higher-than-usual client alliance in a session predicting an increase in therapist alliance in the subsequent session. Growth in neither client-rated nor therapist-rated working alliances was significantly associated with client improvement. Lower variabilities (fewer fluctuations) in both client- and therapist-rated working alliances were associated with better outcomes. Higher therapist-actor and partner effects were associated with client improvement, but client-actor and partner effects were not associated with client improvement. Average working alliances were not associated with client improvement. Implications for practice and research were discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Counseling Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Counseling Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000715\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000715","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用纵向客户和治疗师的工作联盟评级,先前的研究检验了联盟:平均值、线性增长、可变性、稳定性(自相关)和合作伙伴反应性如何与客户结果相关。然而,没有一项研究同时考察了所有这些方面。在分析中忽略重要变量可能导致对相关效应的高估。因此,本研究的目的是同时检验这些影响。治疗师(N = 45)和来访者(N = 236)在每次治疗(N = 10,720)后对联盟进行评分,来访者在每八次治疗后完成一项心理困扰测量。我们使用动态结构方程模型,利用纵向参与者-伴侣互动和位置尺度模型来模拟纵向评级。在整个治疗过程中,来访者和治疗师的联盟评分有显著的线性增长和显著的变化。变异表明多个“V”型,这与联盟破裂有关。两种行为人效应均显著,显示来访者和治疗师联盟在疗程间的稳定性。此外,客户-合作伙伴效应显著,表明在一个会话中高于平时的客户联盟预示着在随后的会话中治疗师联盟的增加。无论是客户评价还是治疗师评价的工作联盟的增长都与客户的改善显著相关。在客户和治疗师评价的工作联盟中,较低的变异性(较少的波动)与较好的结果相关。较高的治疗师-行为人和伴侣效应与来访者改善有关,但来访者-行为人和伴侣效应与来访者改善无关。一般的工作联盟与客户的改善无关。讨论了对实践和研究的启示。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Therapist and client perceptions of the working alliance: Codevelopment, linear growth, variability, and client functioning.

Using longitudinal client and therapist working alliance ratings, previous research examined how alliance: average value, linear growth, variability, stability (autocorrelation), and partner responsiveness were associated with client outcome. However, no research simultaneously examined all of these dimensions. Omitting important variables in analyses could lead to overestimation of related effects. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine these effects simultaneously. Therapists (N = 45) and clients (N = 236) rated alliance after every session (N = 10,720) and clients completed a measure of psychological distress after every eighth session. We used dynamic structure equation modeling to model longitudinal ratings using the longitudinal actor-partner interaction and location-scale models. Across sessions, there were significant linear growth and significant variability in client and therapist alliance ratings. The variability indicates multiple "V" patterns, which have been associated with alliance ruptures. Both actor effects were significant, showing session-to-session stability for client and therapist alliance. In addition, client-partner effect was significant, indicating higher-than-usual client alliance in a session predicting an increase in therapist alliance in the subsequent session. Growth in neither client-rated nor therapist-rated working alliances was significantly associated with client improvement. Lower variabilities (fewer fluctuations) in both client- and therapist-rated working alliances were associated with better outcomes. Higher therapist-actor and partner effects were associated with client improvement, but client-actor and partner effects were not associated with client improvement. Average working alliances were not associated with client improvement. Implications for practice and research were discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: The Journal of Counseling Psychology® publishes empirical research in the areas of counseling activities (including assessment, interventions, consultation, supervision, training, prevention, and psychological education) career development and vocational psychology diversity and underrepresented populations in relation to counseling activities the development of new measures to be used in counseling activities professional issues in counseling psychology In addition, the Journal of Counseling Psychology considers reviews or theoretical contributions that have the potential for stimulating further research in counseling psychology, and conceptual or empirical contributions about methodological issues in counseling psychology research.
期刊最新文献
Perceived parental career expectation and adolescent career development: The mediating role of adolescent career-planning and goal-setting self-efficacy and the moderating role of perceived parent-adolescent career congruence. Psychotherapists' outcome expectations: How are they established? Traditional healing as mental health intervention: Contemporary insights from an American Indian healer. Trauma-informed acceptance and commitment therapy with peer coaching for college students: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Navigating faith transitions: A 4-year longitudinal examination of religious deidentification among LGBTQ+ latter-day saints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1