超保留机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术提供早期失禁恢复。

Eyup Veli Kucuk, Resul Sobay, Ahmet Tahra
{"title":"超保留机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术提供早期失禁恢复。","authors":"Eyup Veli Kucuk,&nbsp;Resul Sobay,&nbsp;Ahmet Tahra","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>We aimed to evaluate oncological and functional results of the ultrapreservation anterior-sparing technique in patients with localized prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center study, patients with low to intermediate risk prostate cancer, who were treated with the ultrapreservation anterior-sparing technique, were included retrospectively. The oncological and functional outcomes were recorded. After the functional and pathological evaluation in the first month, patients' prostate-specific antigen levels were followed, as well as continence and potency status bimonthly for one year. Continence is defined as no leakage and zero pads for security. Patients' potency was evaluated using the Sexual Health Inventory for Men, with ≥ 17 considered potent.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 118 patients were included in the study. The pathological stage was pT2 in 78% (n = 92) of patients, with pT3 in 22% (n = 26). Surgical margin positivity occurred in 13.5% (n = 16) of patients. No complications were observed intraoperatively. Continence rates were 25.4% after catheter removal, rising to 88.9% in the first month, 91.5% in the third, 93.2% in the fifth, and 95.7% a year later. Thirty-five (40%) of 86 potent patients were potent in the first postoperative month, 48 patients (55.8%) were potent in the third month, and 58 patients (67.4%) were potent in the twelfth. The total complication rate was 8.4%, with no major complications observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ultrapreservation anterior-sparing technique for patients with prostate cancer shows safe, acceptable functional and oncological results in short-term follow-up. However, long-term comparative studies with a larger number of patients are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f2/4f/e2022.00077.PMC10065757.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrapreservation in Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Provides Early Continence Recovery.\",\"authors\":\"Eyup Veli Kucuk,&nbsp;Resul Sobay,&nbsp;Ahmet Tahra\",\"doi\":\"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>We aimed to evaluate oncological and functional results of the ultrapreservation anterior-sparing technique in patients with localized prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center study, patients with low to intermediate risk prostate cancer, who were treated with the ultrapreservation anterior-sparing technique, were included retrospectively. The oncological and functional outcomes were recorded. After the functional and pathological evaluation in the first month, patients' prostate-specific antigen levels were followed, as well as continence and potency status bimonthly for one year. Continence is defined as no leakage and zero pads for security. Patients' potency was evaluated using the Sexual Health Inventory for Men, with ≥ 17 considered potent.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 118 patients were included in the study. The pathological stage was pT2 in 78% (n = 92) of patients, with pT3 in 22% (n = 26). Surgical margin positivity occurred in 13.5% (n = 16) of patients. No complications were observed intraoperatively. Continence rates were 25.4% after catheter removal, rising to 88.9% in the first month, 91.5% in the third, 93.2% in the fifth, and 95.7% a year later. Thirty-five (40%) of 86 potent patients were potent in the first postoperative month, 48 patients (55.8%) were potent in the third month, and 58 patients (67.4%) were potent in the twelfth. The total complication rate was 8.4%, with no major complications observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ultrapreservation anterior-sparing technique for patients with prostate cancer shows safe, acceptable functional and oncological results in short-term follow-up. However, long-term comparative studies with a larger number of patients are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f2/4f/e2022.00077.PMC10065757.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00077\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:我们旨在评估超保留前路保留技术在局限性前列腺癌患者中的肿瘤学和功能结果。方法:在这项单中心研究中,回顾性纳入采用超保留前路保留技术治疗的低至中危前列腺癌患者。记录肿瘤和功能结果。在第一个月进行功能和病理评估后,随访患者的前列腺特异性抗原水平,以及为期一年的失禁和效力状况。自制被定义为无泄漏和零安全垫。使用男性性健康量表评估患者的效力,≥17视为有效。结果:共纳入118例患者。病理分期为pT2的占78% (n = 92), pT3的占22% (n = 26)。13.5% (n = 16)的患者出现手术切缘阳性。术中未见并发症。拔管后尿失禁率为25.4%,1个月上升至88.9%,3个月上升至91.5%,5个月上升至93.2%,1年后上升至95.7%。86例有效患者中35例(40%)术后1个月有效,48例(55.8%)术后3个月有效,58例(67.4%)术后12个月有效。总并发症发生率为8.4%,未见重大并发症。结论:前列腺癌患者采用超保留前路技术短期随访,功能和肿瘤效果安全、可接受。然而,需要大量患者的长期比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ultrapreservation in Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Provides Early Continence Recovery.

Background and objectives: We aimed to evaluate oncological and functional results of the ultrapreservation anterior-sparing technique in patients with localized prostate cancer.

Methods: In this single-center study, patients with low to intermediate risk prostate cancer, who were treated with the ultrapreservation anterior-sparing technique, were included retrospectively. The oncological and functional outcomes were recorded. After the functional and pathological evaluation in the first month, patients' prostate-specific antigen levels were followed, as well as continence and potency status bimonthly for one year. Continence is defined as no leakage and zero pads for security. Patients' potency was evaluated using the Sexual Health Inventory for Men, with ≥ 17 considered potent.

Results: A total of 118 patients were included in the study. The pathological stage was pT2 in 78% (n = 92) of patients, with pT3 in 22% (n = 26). Surgical margin positivity occurred in 13.5% (n = 16) of patients. No complications were observed intraoperatively. Continence rates were 25.4% after catheter removal, rising to 88.9% in the first month, 91.5% in the third, 93.2% in the fifth, and 95.7% a year later. Thirty-five (40%) of 86 potent patients were potent in the first postoperative month, 48 patients (55.8%) were potent in the third month, and 58 patients (67.4%) were potent in the twelfth. The total complication rate was 8.4%, with no major complications observed.

Conclusion: The ultrapreservation anterior-sparing technique for patients with prostate cancer shows safe, acceptable functional and oncological results in short-term follow-up. However, long-term comparative studies with a larger number of patients are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons publishes original scientific articles on basic science and technical topics in all the fields involved with laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive surgery. CRSLS, MIS Case Reports from SLS is dedicated to the publication of Case Reports in the field of minimally invasive surgery. The journals seek to advance our understandings and practice of minimally invasive, image-guided surgery by providing a forum for all relevant disciplines and by promoting the exchange of information and ideas across specialties.
期刊最新文献
Hysterectomy for Large Uterus by Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS). Surgeons' Approach to Intraoperative Complications in Total Extraperitoneal (TEP) Hernia Repair. Inferior-Medial Approach to Laparoscopic Splenic Vessel-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy. Comparative Analysis of Hemostasis and Staple-Line Integrity between Medtronic Tri-StapleTM with Preloaded Buttress Material and the AEONTM Stapler in Bariatric Surgery. Current Status and Role of Artificial Intelligence in Anorectal Diseases and Pelvic Floor Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1