一种新的军事人员专用反应时间测试方法的验证。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Motor Control Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1123/mc.2022-0034
Danica Janicijevic, Sergio Miras-Moreno, Alejandro Pérez-Castilla, Jesús Vera, Beatriz Redondo, Raimundo Jiménez, Amador Garcia-Ramos
{"title":"一种新的军事人员专用反应时间测试方法的验证。","authors":"Danica Janicijevic,&nbsp;Sergio Miras-Moreno,&nbsp;Alejandro Pérez-Castilla,&nbsp;Jesús Vera,&nbsp;Beatriz Redondo,&nbsp;Raimundo Jiménez,&nbsp;Amador Garcia-Ramos","doi":"10.1123/mc.2022-0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A military-specific reaction time (RT) test was developed to explore its reliability and sensitivity to discriminate between military personnel and sport science students. Fifteen male professional Spanish soldiers and 16 male sport science students completed two RT test modalities: military-specific and nonspecific RT tests. For each RT test modality, both the Simple (i.e., one stimulus, one response) and the Go, No-Go RT (i.e., true, and false stimuli, one response) were tested. The military-specific RT test consisted of a video presented through virtual reality glasses of a forest environment in which soldiers would appear from behind different bushes (stimuli) and the response consisted of pressing the button of a gun-shaped mouse (when they saw a soldier pointing a rifle at them). Both Simple and Go, No-Go RT reached acceptable reliability in both populations (coefficient of variation ≤ 9.64%). Military personnel presented a lower RT than sport science students during the military-specific RT test (p ≤ .001), while no differences were obtained during the nonspecific RT test. RT values were not significantly correlated between the military-specific and nonspecific RT tests (r ≤ .02). These findings collectively suggest that the novel military-specific RT test is an ecologically valid alternative to evaluate the information processing abilities of military personnel.</p>","PeriodicalId":49795,"journal":{"name":"Motor Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a Novel Reaction Time Test Specific for Military Personnel.\",\"authors\":\"Danica Janicijevic,&nbsp;Sergio Miras-Moreno,&nbsp;Alejandro Pérez-Castilla,&nbsp;Jesús Vera,&nbsp;Beatriz Redondo,&nbsp;Raimundo Jiménez,&nbsp;Amador Garcia-Ramos\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/mc.2022-0034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A military-specific reaction time (RT) test was developed to explore its reliability and sensitivity to discriminate between military personnel and sport science students. Fifteen male professional Spanish soldiers and 16 male sport science students completed two RT test modalities: military-specific and nonspecific RT tests. For each RT test modality, both the Simple (i.e., one stimulus, one response) and the Go, No-Go RT (i.e., true, and false stimuli, one response) were tested. The military-specific RT test consisted of a video presented through virtual reality glasses of a forest environment in which soldiers would appear from behind different bushes (stimuli) and the response consisted of pressing the button of a gun-shaped mouse (when they saw a soldier pointing a rifle at them). Both Simple and Go, No-Go RT reached acceptable reliability in both populations (coefficient of variation ≤ 9.64%). Military personnel presented a lower RT than sport science students during the military-specific RT test (p ≤ .001), while no differences were obtained during the nonspecific RT test. RT values were not significantly correlated between the military-specific and nonspecific RT tests (r ≤ .02). These findings collectively suggest that the novel military-specific RT test is an ecologically valid alternative to evaluate the information processing abilities of military personnel.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Motor Control\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Motor Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/mc.2022-0034\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Motor Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/mc.2022-0034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用军事特异性反应时间(RT)测验,探讨其在军事人员和体育科学专业学生之间的信度和灵敏度。15名西班牙男性职业军人和16名男性运动科学专业学生完成了两种RT测试模式:军事特异性RT测试和非特异性RT测试。对于每一种RT测试模式,简单RT(即一个刺激,一个反应)和Go, No-Go RT(即真假刺激,一个反应)都进行了测试。军事专用RT测试包括通过虚拟现实眼镜播放的森林环境视频,其中士兵会从不同的灌木丛后面出现(刺激),反应包括按下枪形鼠标的按钮(当他们看到一个士兵用步枪指着他们时)。简单RT和Go、No-Go RT在两组人群中均达到可接受的信度(变异系数≤9.64%)。在军事特异性RT检验中,军事人员的RT低于体育科学专业学生(p≤0.001),而在非特异性RT检验中,差异无统计学意义。RT值在军事特异性和非特异性RT测试之间无显著相关(r≤0.02)。这些发现共同表明,新的军事特异性RT测试是一个生态有效的替代评估军事人员的信息处理能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of a Novel Reaction Time Test Specific for Military Personnel.

A military-specific reaction time (RT) test was developed to explore its reliability and sensitivity to discriminate between military personnel and sport science students. Fifteen male professional Spanish soldiers and 16 male sport science students completed two RT test modalities: military-specific and nonspecific RT tests. For each RT test modality, both the Simple (i.e., one stimulus, one response) and the Go, No-Go RT (i.e., true, and false stimuli, one response) were tested. The military-specific RT test consisted of a video presented through virtual reality glasses of a forest environment in which soldiers would appear from behind different bushes (stimuli) and the response consisted of pressing the button of a gun-shaped mouse (when they saw a soldier pointing a rifle at them). Both Simple and Go, No-Go RT reached acceptable reliability in both populations (coefficient of variation ≤ 9.64%). Military personnel presented a lower RT than sport science students during the military-specific RT test (p ≤ .001), while no differences were obtained during the nonspecific RT test. RT values were not significantly correlated between the military-specific and nonspecific RT tests (r ≤ .02). These findings collectively suggest that the novel military-specific RT test is an ecologically valid alternative to evaluate the information processing abilities of military personnel.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Motor Control
Motor Control 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Motor Control (MC), a peer-reviewed journal, provides a multidisciplinary examination of human movement across the lifespan. To keep you abreast of current developments in the field of motor control, it offers timely coverage of important topics, including issues related to motor disorders. This international journal publishes many types of research papers, from clinical experimental to modeling and theoretical studies. These papers come from such varied disciplines as biomechanics, kinesiology, neurophysiology, neuroscience, psychology, physical medicine, and rehabilitation. Motor Control, the official journal of the International Society of Motor Control, is designed to provide a multidisciplinary forum for the exchange of scientific information on the control of human movement across the lifespan, including issues related to motor disorders. Motor Control encourages submission of papers from a variety of disciplines including, but not limited to, biomechanics, kinesiology, neurophysiology, neuroscience, psychology, physical medicine, and rehabilitation. This peer-reviewed journal publishes a wide variety of types of research papers including clinical experimental, modeling, and theoretical studies. To be considered for publication, papers should clearly demonstrate a contribution to the understanding of control of movement. In addition to publishing research papers, Motor Control publishes review articles, quick communications, commentaries, target articles, and book reviews. When warranted, an entire issue may be devoted to a specific topic within the area of motor control.
期刊最新文献
Attentional Focus Strategies Can Improve Performance of Postural Control in Runners. Effect of a Perturbation-Based Balance Training Session on Adaptive Locomotor Response in Older Adults With a History of Falls. Postmovement Beta Rebound in Real and Imagined Movement. Vision Is Not Required to Elicit Balance Improvements From Beam Walking Practice. Effectiveness of Motor Imagery on Physical Function in Patients With Stroke: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1