内镜下粘膜剥离治疗上消化道上皮下肿瘤:一项西方多中心研究。

IF 1 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1159/000525993
Raffaele Manta, Francesco Paolo Zito, Francesco Pugliese, Angelo Caruso, Santi Mangiafico, Alessandra D'Alessandro, Danilo Castellani, Ugo Germani, Massimiliano Mutignani, Rita Luisa Conigliaro, Luca Reggiani Bonetti, Takahisa Matsuda, Vincenzo De Francesco, Angelo Zullo, Giuseppe Galloro
{"title":"内镜下粘膜剥离治疗上消化道上皮下肿瘤:一项西方多中心研究。","authors":"Raffaele Manta,&nbsp;Francesco Paolo Zito,&nbsp;Francesco Pugliese,&nbsp;Angelo Caruso,&nbsp;Santi Mangiafico,&nbsp;Alessandra D'Alessandro,&nbsp;Danilo Castellani,&nbsp;Ugo Germani,&nbsp;Massimiliano Mutignani,&nbsp;Rita Luisa Conigliaro,&nbsp;Luca Reggiani Bonetti,&nbsp;Takahisa Matsuda,&nbsp;Vincenzo De Francesco,&nbsp;Angelo Zullo,&nbsp;Giuseppe Galloro","doi":"10.1159/000525993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been proposed for removal of gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors (GI-SETs), but data are still scanty. This study aimed to report a case series from a western country.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Data of patients with upper GI-SETs suitable for ESD removal observed in 4 centers were retrospectively reviewed. Before endoscopic procedure, the lesion was characterized by endosonographic evaluation, histology, and CT scan. The <i>en bloc</i> resection and the R0 resection rates were calculated, as well as incidence of complications, and the 1-year follow-up was reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data of 84 patients with esophageal (<i>N</i> = 13), gastric (<i>N</i> = 61), and duodenal (<i>N</i> = 10) GI-SETs were collected. The mean diameter of lesions was 26 mm (range: 12-110 mm). There were 17 gastrointestinal stromal tumors, 12 neuroendocrine tumors, 35 leiomyomas, 18 lipomas, and 2 hamartomas. <i>En bloc</i> and R0 resection were achieved in 83 (98.8%) and in 80 (95.2%) patients, respectively. Overall, a complication occurred in 11 (13.1%) patients, including bleeding (<i>N</i> = 7) and perforation (<i>N</i> = 4). Endoscopic approach was successful in all bleedings, but 1 patient who required radiological embolization, and in 2 perforations, while surgery was performed in the other patients. Overall, a surgical approach was eventually needed in 5 (5.9%), including 3 in whom R0 resection failed and 2 with perforation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study found that ESD may be an effective and safe alternative to surgical intervention for both benign and localized malignant GI-SETs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51838,"journal":{"name":"GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a0/3e/pjg-0030-0115.PMC10050838.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Subepithelial Tumor Treatment in the Upper Digestive Tract: A Western, Multicenter Study.\",\"authors\":\"Raffaele Manta,&nbsp;Francesco Paolo Zito,&nbsp;Francesco Pugliese,&nbsp;Angelo Caruso,&nbsp;Santi Mangiafico,&nbsp;Alessandra D'Alessandro,&nbsp;Danilo Castellani,&nbsp;Ugo Germani,&nbsp;Massimiliano Mutignani,&nbsp;Rita Luisa Conigliaro,&nbsp;Luca Reggiani Bonetti,&nbsp;Takahisa Matsuda,&nbsp;Vincenzo De Francesco,&nbsp;Angelo Zullo,&nbsp;Giuseppe Galloro\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000525993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been proposed for removal of gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors (GI-SETs), but data are still scanty. This study aimed to report a case series from a western country.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Data of patients with upper GI-SETs suitable for ESD removal observed in 4 centers were retrospectively reviewed. Before endoscopic procedure, the lesion was characterized by endosonographic evaluation, histology, and CT scan. The <i>en bloc</i> resection and the R0 resection rates were calculated, as well as incidence of complications, and the 1-year follow-up was reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data of 84 patients with esophageal (<i>N</i> = 13), gastric (<i>N</i> = 61), and duodenal (<i>N</i> = 10) GI-SETs were collected. The mean diameter of lesions was 26 mm (range: 12-110 mm). There were 17 gastrointestinal stromal tumors, 12 neuroendocrine tumors, 35 leiomyomas, 18 lipomas, and 2 hamartomas. <i>En bloc</i> and R0 resection were achieved in 83 (98.8%) and in 80 (95.2%) patients, respectively. Overall, a complication occurred in 11 (13.1%) patients, including bleeding (<i>N</i> = 7) and perforation (<i>N</i> = 4). Endoscopic approach was successful in all bleedings, but 1 patient who required radiological embolization, and in 2 perforations, while surgery was performed in the other patients. Overall, a surgical approach was eventually needed in 5 (5.9%), including 3 in whom R0 resection failed and 2 with perforation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study found that ESD may be an effective and safe alternative to surgical intervention for both benign and localized malignant GI-SETs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a0/3e/pjg-0030-0115.PMC10050838.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000525993\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000525993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景/目的:内镜下粘膜剥离(ESD)已被提出用于胃肠道上皮下肿瘤(GI-SETs)的切除,但数据仍然很少。本研究旨在报道一个西方国家的病例系列。患者和方法:回顾性分析4个中心观察到的适合ESD移除的上GI-SETs患者的资料。在内窥镜手术前,病变通过超声评估、组织学和CT扫描进行表征。计算整体切除率、R0切除率及并发症发生率,并报道1年随访。结果:收集84例食管(N = 13)、胃(N = 61)、十二指肠(N = 10) GI-SETs数据。病灶直径平均26 mm(范围12 ~ 110 mm)。胃肠道间质瘤17例,神经内分泌瘤12例,平滑肌瘤35例,脂肪瘤18例,错构瘤2例。整体切除83例(98.8%),R0切除80例(95.2%)。总体而言,11例(13.1%)患者出现并发症,包括出血(N = 7)和穿孔(N = 4)。内镜下入路在所有出血中都成功,但1例患者需要放射栓塞,2例穿孔,而其他患者进行了手术。总体而言,5例(5.9%)最终需要手术入路,其中3例R0切除术失败,2例穿孔。结论:我们的研究发现,对于良性和局部恶性GI-SETs, ESD可能是一种有效且安全的手术干预方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Subepithelial Tumor Treatment in the Upper Digestive Tract: A Western, Multicenter Study.

Background/aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been proposed for removal of gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors (GI-SETs), but data are still scanty. This study aimed to report a case series from a western country.

Patients and methods: Data of patients with upper GI-SETs suitable for ESD removal observed in 4 centers were retrospectively reviewed. Before endoscopic procedure, the lesion was characterized by endosonographic evaluation, histology, and CT scan. The en bloc resection and the R0 resection rates were calculated, as well as incidence of complications, and the 1-year follow-up was reported.

Results: Data of 84 patients with esophageal (N = 13), gastric (N = 61), and duodenal (N = 10) GI-SETs were collected. The mean diameter of lesions was 26 mm (range: 12-110 mm). There were 17 gastrointestinal stromal tumors, 12 neuroendocrine tumors, 35 leiomyomas, 18 lipomas, and 2 hamartomas. En bloc and R0 resection were achieved in 83 (98.8%) and in 80 (95.2%) patients, respectively. Overall, a complication occurred in 11 (13.1%) patients, including bleeding (N = 7) and perforation (N = 4). Endoscopic approach was successful in all bleedings, but 1 patient who required radiological embolization, and in 2 perforations, while surgery was performed in the other patients. Overall, a surgical approach was eventually needed in 5 (5.9%), including 3 in whom R0 resection failed and 2 with perforation.

Conclusions: Our study found that ESD may be an effective and safe alternative to surgical intervention for both benign and localized malignant GI-SETs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology
GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
62
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The ''GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology'' (formerly Jornal Português de Gastrenterologia), founded in 1994, is the official publication of Sociedade Portuguesa de Gastrenterologia (Portuguese Society of Gastroenterology), Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (Portuguese Society of Digestive Endoscopy) and Associação Portuguesa para o Estudo do Fígado (Portuguese Association for the Study of the Liver). The journal publishes clinical and basic research articles on Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy, Hepatology and related topics. Review articles, clinical case studies, images, letters to the editor and other articles such as recommendations or papers on gastroenterology clinical practice are also considered. Only articles written in English are accepted.
期刊最新文献
Portuguese Pancreatic Club Perspectives on Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Staging, Associated Genetic Syndromes and Particularities of Their Clinical Approach. Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Gynecological Surgery: An Atypical Endoscopic Diagnosis. Portuguese Pancreatic Club Perspectives on Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided and Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Schwannoma of Common Bile Duct: A Clinico-Radiologic Diagnostic Quagmire – A Case Report Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Using Band Ligation of a Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1