Nancy J Cooke, Myke C Cohen, Walter C Fazio, Laura H Inderberg, Craig J Johnson, Glenn J Lematta, Matthew Peel, Aaron Teo
{"title":"从团队到团队精神：团队认知科学的未来方向》。","authors":"Nancy J Cooke, Myke C Cohen, Walter C Fazio, Laura H Inderberg, Craig J Johnson, Glenn J Lematta, Matthew Peel, Aaron Teo","doi":"10.1177/00187208231162449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We review the current state-of-the-art in team cognition research, but more importantly describe the limitations of existing theories, laboratory paradigms, and measures considering the increasing complexities of modern teams and the study of team cognition.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Research on, and applications of, team cognition has led to theories, data, and measures over the last several decades.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This article is based on research questions generated in a spring 2022 seminar on team cognition at Arizona State University led by the first author.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Future research directions are proposed for extending the conceptualization of teams and team cognition by examining dimensions of teamness; extending laboratory paradigms to attain more realistic teaming, including nonhuman teammates; and advancing measures of team cognition in a direction such that data can be collected unobtrusively, in real time, and automatically.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The future of team cognition is one of the new discoveries, new research paradigms, and new measures.</p><p><strong>Application: </strong>Extending the concepts of teams and team cognition can also extend the potential applications of these concepts.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11044519/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Teams to Teamness: Future Directions in the Science of Team Cognition.\",\"authors\":\"Nancy J Cooke, Myke C Cohen, Walter C Fazio, Laura H Inderberg, Craig J Johnson, Glenn J Lematta, Matthew Peel, Aaron Teo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00187208231162449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We review the current state-of-the-art in team cognition research, but more importantly describe the limitations of existing theories, laboratory paradigms, and measures considering the increasing complexities of modern teams and the study of team cognition.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Research on, and applications of, team cognition has led to theories, data, and measures over the last several decades.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This article is based on research questions generated in a spring 2022 seminar on team cognition at Arizona State University led by the first author.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Future research directions are proposed for extending the conceptualization of teams and team cognition by examining dimensions of teamness; extending laboratory paradigms to attain more realistic teaming, including nonhuman teammates; and advancing measures of team cognition in a direction such that data can be collected unobtrusively, in real time, and automatically.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The future of team cognition is one of the new discoveries, new research paradigms, and new measures.</p><p><strong>Application: </strong>Extending the concepts of teams and team cognition can also extend the potential applications of these concepts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Factors\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11044519/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Factors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208231162449\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208231162449","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
From Teams to Teamness: Future Directions in the Science of Team Cognition.
Objective: We review the current state-of-the-art in team cognition research, but more importantly describe the limitations of existing theories, laboratory paradigms, and measures considering the increasing complexities of modern teams and the study of team cognition.
Background: Research on, and applications of, team cognition has led to theories, data, and measures over the last several decades.
Method: This article is based on research questions generated in a spring 2022 seminar on team cognition at Arizona State University led by the first author.
Results: Future research directions are proposed for extending the conceptualization of teams and team cognition by examining dimensions of teamness; extending laboratory paradigms to attain more realistic teaming, including nonhuman teammates; and advancing measures of team cognition in a direction such that data can be collected unobtrusively, in real time, and automatically.
Conclusion: The future of team cognition is one of the new discoveries, new research paradigms, and new measures.
Application: Extending the concepts of teams and team cognition can also extend the potential applications of these concepts.
期刊介绍：
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
