临床护理教师教学自我效能的预测因素:一项横断面研究。

Pei-Ling Wu, Hsueh-Hou Ho
{"title":"临床护理教师教学自我效能的预测因素:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Pei-Ling Wu,&nbsp;Hsueh-Hou Ho","doi":"10.5152/FNJN.2023.22179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the relationship among clinical nursing teachers' perceived stress, job stress, and teaching self-efficacy and to identify important predictors of clinical nursing teachers' teaching self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional study was designed. Data were collected from May 2019 to January 2020, and 205 clinical nursing teachers were recruited from the Department of Nursing in Taiwan. Data were collected for the Perceived Stress Scale, Job Content Questionnaire, and Clinical Nursing Teacher Self-Efficacy Scale. Descriptive statistics, independent t-test, Pearson's correlation, and multiple/stepwise linear regressions were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Perceived stress and work stress are related to clinical nursing teachers' teaching self-efficacy. Multiple regression analysis showed that perceived stress and three dimensions of job stress (workload, job control, and work-related social support) were identified as significant predictors of teaching self-efficacy, explaining 16.6% of the total variance. Workload was the strongest predictor of teaching self-efficacy, explaining 5.5% of the variance, while perceived stress, job control, and work-related social support accounted for 2.7%, 4.1%, and 1.7% of the variance, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Perceived stress and job stress were identified as predictors of teaching self-efficacy of clinical nursing teachers. Managers can formulate self-efficacy improvement and decompression plans for clinical nursing teachers to improve teaching self-efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":73033,"journal":{"name":"Florence Nightingale journal of nursing","volume":"31 1","pages":"33-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/df/e0/fnjn-31-1-33.PMC10081118.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of Teaching Self-efficacy in Clinical Nursing Teachers: A Cross-sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Pei-Ling Wu,&nbsp;Hsueh-Hou Ho\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/FNJN.2023.22179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the relationship among clinical nursing teachers' perceived stress, job stress, and teaching self-efficacy and to identify important predictors of clinical nursing teachers' teaching self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional study was designed. Data were collected from May 2019 to January 2020, and 205 clinical nursing teachers were recruited from the Department of Nursing in Taiwan. Data were collected for the Perceived Stress Scale, Job Content Questionnaire, and Clinical Nursing Teacher Self-Efficacy Scale. Descriptive statistics, independent t-test, Pearson's correlation, and multiple/stepwise linear regressions were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Perceived stress and work stress are related to clinical nursing teachers' teaching self-efficacy. Multiple regression analysis showed that perceived stress and three dimensions of job stress (workload, job control, and work-related social support) were identified as significant predictors of teaching self-efficacy, explaining 16.6% of the total variance. Workload was the strongest predictor of teaching self-efficacy, explaining 5.5% of the variance, while perceived stress, job control, and work-related social support accounted for 2.7%, 4.1%, and 1.7% of the variance, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Perceived stress and job stress were identified as predictors of teaching self-efficacy of clinical nursing teachers. Managers can formulate self-efficacy improvement and decompression plans for clinical nursing teachers to improve teaching self-efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Florence Nightingale journal of nursing\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"33-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/df/e0/fnjn-31-1-33.PMC10081118.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Florence Nightingale journal of nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/FNJN.2023.22179\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Florence Nightingale journal of nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/FNJN.2023.22179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨临床护理教师感知压力、工作压力与教学自我效能感的关系,寻找临床护理教师教学自我效能感的重要预测因子。方法:设计横断面研究。数据采集于2019年5月至2020年1月,在台湾省护理系招募205名临床护理教师。收集压力感知量表、工作内容问卷和临床护理教师自我效能感量表的数据。采用描述性统计、独立t检验、Pearson相关和多元/逐步线性回归进行分析。结果:感知压力、工作压力与临床护理教师教学自我效能感相关。多元回归分析显示,感知压力和工作压力的三个维度(工作量、工作控制和工作相关的社会支持)是教学自我效能感的显著预测因子,解释总方差的16.6%。工作量是教学自我效能的最强预测因子,解释了5.5%的方差,而感知压力、工作控制和与工作相关的社会支持分别占方差的2.7%、4.1%和1.7%。结论:感知压力和工作压力是临床护理教师教学自我效能感的预测因子。管理者可以为临床护理教师制定自我效能感提升减压计划,提高教学自我效能感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictors of Teaching Self-efficacy in Clinical Nursing Teachers: A Cross-sectional Study.

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the relationship among clinical nursing teachers' perceived stress, job stress, and teaching self-efficacy and to identify important predictors of clinical nursing teachers' teaching self-efficacy.

Method: A cross-sectional study was designed. Data were collected from May 2019 to January 2020, and 205 clinical nursing teachers were recruited from the Department of Nursing in Taiwan. Data were collected for the Perceived Stress Scale, Job Content Questionnaire, and Clinical Nursing Teacher Self-Efficacy Scale. Descriptive statistics, independent t-test, Pearson's correlation, and multiple/stepwise linear regressions were used for analysis.

Results: Perceived stress and work stress are related to clinical nursing teachers' teaching self-efficacy. Multiple regression analysis showed that perceived stress and three dimensions of job stress (workload, job control, and work-related social support) were identified as significant predictors of teaching self-efficacy, explaining 16.6% of the total variance. Workload was the strongest predictor of teaching self-efficacy, explaining 5.5% of the variance, while perceived stress, job control, and work-related social support accounted for 2.7%, 4.1%, and 1.7% of the variance, respectively.

Conclusion: Perceived stress and job stress were identified as predictors of teaching self-efficacy of clinical nursing teachers. Managers can formulate self-efficacy improvement and decompression plans for clinical nursing teachers to improve teaching self-efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Kangaroo Mother Care on Perfusion Index, Heart Rate, and Oxygen Saturation in Premature Infants Who were Discharged Early and Admitted to The Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Randomized Control Tria. Knowledge and Attitude on Neonatal Resuscitation Among Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. Shivering Hopes: A Qualitative Inquiry into the Experiences of Family Caregivers of Critically Ill Patients Reliant on Health Care Technology. The Impact of Clinical Practice Stress on Nursing Professional Competence among Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study. The Narrowing of Self as Perceived by People in the Early Stages of Dementia-The Second Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1