[风湿病患者在生物治疗下的疼痛评估]。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Anales Del Sistema Sanitario De Navarra Pub Date : 2022-11-22 DOI:10.23938/ASSN.1020
María Pilar Monforte Gasque, Esteban Manuel Lázaro Gallardo, Ana María Lázaro Castellano, Ana Cristina Querol Hernández, Estrella Maroto García, Ferrán Borrás Martí
{"title":"[风湿病患者在生物治疗下的疼痛评估]。","authors":"María Pilar Monforte Gasque,&nbsp;Esteban Manuel Lázaro Gallardo,&nbsp;Ana María Lázaro Castellano,&nbsp;Ana Cristina Querol Hernández,&nbsp;Estrella Maroto García,&nbsp;Ferrán Borrás Martí","doi":"10.23938/ASSN.1020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess pain in patients with rheumatic disease under biological therapy treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational retrospective study of patients with rheumatic disease under biological therapy treatment who visited the health care center as outpatients in February/August 2020. We collected demographic (sex and age), clinical (diagnosis, pain presence, intensity, and location), and pharmacological (biological therapy, concomitant treatment with traditional DMARDs, and analgesic treatment) variables from the electronic medical records and Farmatools Dominion®.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 138 patients; mean age was 56 years and 71% were female. The most frequent diagnosis (47%) was ankylosing spondylitis. Anti-TNF-a was the most prescribed biological drug (64%); 60.1% of study patients received traditional drugs, particularly methotrexate and leflunomide (51.8 and 28.9%, respectively). Pain was reported in 81% of the cases, particularly in hands (73.2%) and knees (69.6%); mean pain intensity was 6.5 (VAS). Although 83.3% of the patients had been prescribed analgesics, pain persisted in 84.8% of the cases (VAS >4), being severe or very severe in 67.9%. Over half of the patients (52.2%) used more than one analgesic. The most frequently prescribed medications were non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (60%), paracetamol (52.2%), and opioids (56.5%). NSAIDs controlled pain (14.5%) better than opioids (8.3%); there was no post-treatment improvement of pain in 29.6% of the patients. The number of prescribed drugs increased with pain intensity (rho= 0.264; p= 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Almost 70% of study patients had uncontrolled severe rheumatic-related pain. This implies a challenge for esta­blishing effective treatments for this type of pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":7775,"journal":{"name":"Anales Del Sistema Sanitario De Navarra","volume":"45 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/08/8f/assn-45-03-e1020.PMC10065035.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Assessment of pain in patients with rheumatic disease under biological therapy treatment].\",\"authors\":\"María Pilar Monforte Gasque,&nbsp;Esteban Manuel Lázaro Gallardo,&nbsp;Ana María Lázaro Castellano,&nbsp;Ana Cristina Querol Hernández,&nbsp;Estrella Maroto García,&nbsp;Ferrán Borrás Martí\",\"doi\":\"10.23938/ASSN.1020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess pain in patients with rheumatic disease under biological therapy treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational retrospective study of patients with rheumatic disease under biological therapy treatment who visited the health care center as outpatients in February/August 2020. We collected demographic (sex and age), clinical (diagnosis, pain presence, intensity, and location), and pharmacological (biological therapy, concomitant treatment with traditional DMARDs, and analgesic treatment) variables from the electronic medical records and Farmatools Dominion®.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 138 patients; mean age was 56 years and 71% were female. The most frequent diagnosis (47%) was ankylosing spondylitis. Anti-TNF-a was the most prescribed biological drug (64%); 60.1% of study patients received traditional drugs, particularly methotrexate and leflunomide (51.8 and 28.9%, respectively). Pain was reported in 81% of the cases, particularly in hands (73.2%) and knees (69.6%); mean pain intensity was 6.5 (VAS). Although 83.3% of the patients had been prescribed analgesics, pain persisted in 84.8% of the cases (VAS >4), being severe or very severe in 67.9%. Over half of the patients (52.2%) used more than one analgesic. The most frequently prescribed medications were non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (60%), paracetamol (52.2%), and opioids (56.5%). NSAIDs controlled pain (14.5%) better than opioids (8.3%); there was no post-treatment improvement of pain in 29.6% of the patients. The number of prescribed drugs increased with pain intensity (rho= 0.264; p= 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Almost 70% of study patients had uncontrolled severe rheumatic-related pain. This implies a challenge for esta­blishing effective treatments for this type of pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anales Del Sistema Sanitario De Navarra\",\"volume\":\"45 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/08/8f/assn-45-03-e1020.PMC10065035.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anales Del Sistema Sanitario De Navarra\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.1020\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales Del Sistema Sanitario De Navarra","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.1020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:评估风湿病患者在生物治疗下的疼痛。方法:对2020年2月/ 8月到卫生保健中心门诊接受生物治疗的风湿病患者进行观察性回顾性研究。我们从电子病历和Farmatools Dominion®收集了人口统计学(性别和年龄)、临床(诊断、疼痛存在、强度和位置)和药理学(生物治疗、传统DMARDs的伴随治疗和镇痛治疗)变量。结果:我们纳入了138例患者;平均年龄56岁,71%为女性。最常见的诊断是强直性脊柱炎(47%)。抗tnf -a是处方最多的生物药物(64%);60.1%的研究患者接受传统药物治疗,特别是甲氨蝶呤和来氟米特(分别为51.8%和28.9%)。81%的病例报告疼痛,特别是手部(73.2%)和膝盖(69.6%);平均疼痛强度为6.5 (VAS)。尽管83.3%的患者已经开了镇痛药,但84.8%的患者持续疼痛(VAS >4), 67.9%的患者为重度或极重度。超过一半的患者(52.2%)使用一种以上的镇痛药。最常见的处方药是非甾体类抗炎药(NSAIDs)(60%)、扑热息痛(52.2%)和阿片类药物(56.5%)。非甾体抗炎药对疼痛的控制(14.5%)优于阿片类药物(8.3%);29.6%的患者治疗后疼痛无改善。处方药物数量随疼痛强度的增加而增加(rho= 0.264;p = 0.006)。结论:几乎70%的研究患者有无法控制的严重风湿病相关疼痛。这意味着为这种类型的疼痛建立有效的治疗方法是一个挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Assessment of pain in patients with rheumatic disease under biological therapy treatment].

Background: To assess pain in patients with rheumatic disease under biological therapy treatment.

Methods: Observational retrospective study of patients with rheumatic disease under biological therapy treatment who visited the health care center as outpatients in February/August 2020. We collected demographic (sex and age), clinical (diagnosis, pain presence, intensity, and location), and pharmacological (biological therapy, concomitant treatment with traditional DMARDs, and analgesic treatment) variables from the electronic medical records and Farmatools Dominion®.

Results: We included 138 patients; mean age was 56 years and 71% were female. The most frequent diagnosis (47%) was ankylosing spondylitis. Anti-TNF-a was the most prescribed biological drug (64%); 60.1% of study patients received traditional drugs, particularly methotrexate and leflunomide (51.8 and 28.9%, respectively). Pain was reported in 81% of the cases, particularly in hands (73.2%) and knees (69.6%); mean pain intensity was 6.5 (VAS). Although 83.3% of the patients had been prescribed analgesics, pain persisted in 84.8% of the cases (VAS >4), being severe or very severe in 67.9%. Over half of the patients (52.2%) used more than one analgesic. The most frequently prescribed medications were non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (60%), paracetamol (52.2%), and opioids (56.5%). NSAIDs controlled pain (14.5%) better than opioids (8.3%); there was no post-treatment improvement of pain in 29.6% of the patients. The number of prescribed drugs increased with pain intensity (rho= 0.264; p= 0.006).

Conclusion: Almost 70% of study patients had uncontrolled severe rheumatic-related pain. This implies a challenge for esta­blishing effective treatments for this type of pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anales Del Sistema Sanitario De Navarra
Anales Del Sistema Sanitario De Navarra 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
30.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: La revista Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra es una revista de contenido médico sanitario de carácter generalista. En ella tienen cabida artículos referidos a temas de salud/enfermedad en general, salud pública, administración y gestión sanitaria y Atención Primaria de salud.
期刊最新文献
Bilateral subgaleal hematoma after a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an uncommon complication. Psychometric analysis of the Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire (PDSQ) and determinants of psychopathology in two outpatient clinics in Navarre (Spain). Effect of mouthwashes on the microhardness of aesthetic composite restorative materials. [Prevalence of dental and mucosal lesions among the pediatric population who attended the emergency department of a general hospital]. [Breastfeeding and rooming-in in the management of neonatal abstinence syndrome. Scoping review].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1