院前急救病人满意度量表[PECPSS]用于急救医疗团队提供的护理:量表开发与验证。

IF 3.1 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES AIMS Public Health Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3934/publichealth.2023011
Junpei Haruna, Nobuyasu Hayasaka, Yukiko Taguchi, Saori Muranaka, Sachi Niiyama, Hirotoshi Inamura, Shuji Uemura, Keigo Sawamoto, Hirotoshi Mizuno, Nobuaki Himuro, Eichi Narimatsu
{"title":"院前急救病人满意度量表[PECPSS]用于急救医疗团队提供的护理:量表开发与验证。","authors":"Junpei Haruna,&nbsp;Nobuyasu Hayasaka,&nbsp;Yukiko Taguchi,&nbsp;Saori Muranaka,&nbsp;Sachi Niiyama,&nbsp;Hirotoshi Inamura,&nbsp;Shuji Uemura,&nbsp;Keigo Sawamoto,&nbsp;Hirotoshi Mizuno,&nbsp;Nobuaki Himuro,&nbsp;Eichi Narimatsu","doi":"10.3934/publichealth.2023011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an emergency medical technician (EMT) care patient satisfaction scale to measure patient satisfaction with prehospital emergency care. To date, patient satisfaction surveys of EMTs have been performed subjectively, e using each facility's questionnaire, without the use of a validated patient satisfaction scale. However, no specific scale has been devised to assess patient satisfaction with EMTs. The study population comprised patients who used an ambulance between November 2020 and May 2021 (N = 202). A survey instrument was administered to participants who provided informed consent. In the process of validating the patient satisfaction scale, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of construct validity was performed. The results of the EFA showed a factor structure consisting of five factors: \"teamwork\", \"explanation and communication\", \"physical treatment and psychological support\", \"quickness of transport\", and \"environment in the ambulance\". In addition, domain and summary scores showed good internal reliability (Cronbach's range = 0.82-0.94). The patient satisfaction scale developed in this study was designed and validated considering the role of EMTs and patients' needs for prehospital care. This scale may be useful in the development of assessments and interventions to improve patient satisfaction with EMTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":45684,"journal":{"name":"AIMS Public Health","volume":"10 1","pages":"129-144"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091127/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prehospital emergency care patient satisfaction scale [PECPSS] for care provided by emergency medical teams: Scale development and validation.\",\"authors\":\"Junpei Haruna,&nbsp;Nobuyasu Hayasaka,&nbsp;Yukiko Taguchi,&nbsp;Saori Muranaka,&nbsp;Sachi Niiyama,&nbsp;Hirotoshi Inamura,&nbsp;Shuji Uemura,&nbsp;Keigo Sawamoto,&nbsp;Hirotoshi Mizuno,&nbsp;Nobuaki Himuro,&nbsp;Eichi Narimatsu\",\"doi\":\"10.3934/publichealth.2023011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an emergency medical technician (EMT) care patient satisfaction scale to measure patient satisfaction with prehospital emergency care. To date, patient satisfaction surveys of EMTs have been performed subjectively, e using each facility's questionnaire, without the use of a validated patient satisfaction scale. However, no specific scale has been devised to assess patient satisfaction with EMTs. The study population comprised patients who used an ambulance between November 2020 and May 2021 (N = 202). A survey instrument was administered to participants who provided informed consent. In the process of validating the patient satisfaction scale, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of construct validity was performed. The results of the EFA showed a factor structure consisting of five factors: \\\"teamwork\\\", \\\"explanation and communication\\\", \\\"physical treatment and psychological support\\\", \\\"quickness of transport\\\", and \\\"environment in the ambulance\\\". In addition, domain and summary scores showed good internal reliability (Cronbach's range = 0.82-0.94). The patient satisfaction scale developed in this study was designed and validated considering the role of EMTs and patients' needs for prehospital care. This scale may be useful in the development of assessments and interventions to improve patient satisfaction with EMTs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIMS Public Health\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"129-144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10091127/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIMS Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2023011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIMS Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2023011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本研究的目的是开发并验证急诊医疗技术员(EMT)护理患者满意度量表,以衡量患者对院前急救护理的满意度。迄今为止,对急诊医生的患者满意度调查都是主观地进行的,使用每个机构的问卷,而没有使用经过验证的患者满意度量表。然而,目前还没有专门的量表来评估病人对急诊医师的满意度。研究人群包括在2020年11月至2021年5月期间使用救护车的患者(N = 202)。向提供知情同意的参与者发放了一份调查工具。在对患者满意度量表进行验证的过程中,进行了构念效度的探索性因子分析(EFA)。EFA结果显示,由“团队合作”、“解释和沟通”、“物理治疗和心理支持”、“运输速度”和“救护车环境”五个因素组成的因子结构。此外,领域和总结得分具有良好的内部信度(Cronbach's range = 0.82-0.94)。本研究所开发的患者满意度量表是考虑到急救医生的角色和患者院前护理的需求而设计和验证的。该量表可能有助于制定评估和干预措施,以提高患者对急诊医师的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prehospital emergency care patient satisfaction scale [PECPSS] for care provided by emergency medical teams: Scale development and validation.

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an emergency medical technician (EMT) care patient satisfaction scale to measure patient satisfaction with prehospital emergency care. To date, patient satisfaction surveys of EMTs have been performed subjectively, e using each facility's questionnaire, without the use of a validated patient satisfaction scale. However, no specific scale has been devised to assess patient satisfaction with EMTs. The study population comprised patients who used an ambulance between November 2020 and May 2021 (N = 202). A survey instrument was administered to participants who provided informed consent. In the process of validating the patient satisfaction scale, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of construct validity was performed. The results of the EFA showed a factor structure consisting of five factors: "teamwork", "explanation and communication", "physical treatment and psychological support", "quickness of transport", and "environment in the ambulance". In addition, domain and summary scores showed good internal reliability (Cronbach's range = 0.82-0.94). The patient satisfaction scale developed in this study was designed and validated considering the role of EMTs and patients' needs for prehospital care. This scale may be useful in the development of assessments and interventions to improve patient satisfaction with EMTs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AIMS Public Health
AIMS Public Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Unraveling the urban climate crisis: Exploring the nexus of urbanization, climate change, and their impacts on the environment and human well-being - A global perspective. Assessing mental resilience with individual and lifestyle determinants among nursing students: An observational study from Greece. Peer (dyadic) support: a hypertension feasibility study for older African American women. Can hotels be used as alternative care sites in disasters and public health emergencies-A narrative review. Safeguarding nurses' mental health: The critical role of psychosocial safety climate in mitigating relational stressors and exhaustion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1