对最近发表的牙齿漂白临床试验的颜色评价方法进行系统的范围审查。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE American journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2023-02-01
Moan Jf Costa, Isabela Dt de Araújo, Isauremi V de Assunçío, Renally Bw E Lima, Boniek Cd Borges
{"title":"对最近发表的牙齿漂白临床试验的颜色评价方法进行系统的范围审查。","authors":"Moan Jf Costa,&nbsp;Isabela Dt de Araújo,&nbsp;Isauremi V de Assunçío,&nbsp;Renally Bw E Lima,&nbsp;Boniek Cd Borges","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic scoping review aimed to survey the literature to answer the following questions: which instruments were used to measure the color change; which teeth were assessed for color; what was the follow-up period, and in which country was the recently published tooth bleaching clinical trial performed?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research was registered in the Open Science Framework. The following databases were searched: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and LILACS. Randomized clinical trials evaluating tooth bleaching with color change analysis, published between 2021 and 2017, were included. The data extracted from included studies were analyzed using a qualitative and descriptive analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>106 articles were analyzed. Most studies used only ΔEab to measure the color change (10.4%), assessed the color change in the maxillary central incisors (45.3%), and included a one-month follow-up (25.4%). The published papers were mostly from research performed in Brazil (51.9%). Many methods have been used in the tooth bleaching clinical trials examined, and a wide variety of instruments used to measure the color change was observed.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The large variation in the methodology criteria of most recent tooth bleaching clinical trials makes data comparison difficult among different studies and raises the need for a guideline for tooth bleaching clinical studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic scoping review of color evaluation methods of recently published tooth bleaching clinical trials.\",\"authors\":\"Moan Jf Costa,&nbsp;Isabela Dt de Araújo,&nbsp;Isauremi V de Assunçío,&nbsp;Renally Bw E Lima,&nbsp;Boniek Cd Borges\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic scoping review aimed to survey the literature to answer the following questions: which instruments were used to measure the color change; which teeth were assessed for color; what was the follow-up period, and in which country was the recently published tooth bleaching clinical trial performed?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research was registered in the Open Science Framework. The following databases were searched: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and LILACS. Randomized clinical trials evaluating tooth bleaching with color change analysis, published between 2021 and 2017, were included. The data extracted from included studies were analyzed using a qualitative and descriptive analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>106 articles were analyzed. Most studies used only ΔEab to measure the color change (10.4%), assessed the color change in the maxillary central incisors (45.3%), and included a one-month follow-up (25.4%). The published papers were mostly from research performed in Brazil (51.9%). Many methods have been used in the tooth bleaching clinical trials examined, and a wide variety of instruments used to measure the color change was observed.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The large variation in the methodology criteria of most recent tooth bleaching clinical trials makes data comparison difficult among different studies and raises the need for a guideline for tooth bleaching clinical studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本系统的范围综述旨在调查文献,以回答以下问题:哪些仪器被用于测量颜色变化;评估了哪些牙齿的颜色;随访时间是多长?最近发表的牙齿漂白临床试验是在哪个国家进行的?方法:本研究已在开放科学框架中注册。检索了以下数据库:PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、EMBASE、Cochrane Library和LILACS。纳入了2021年至2017年间发表的评估牙齿漂白与颜色变化分析的随机临床试验。从纳入的研究中提取的数据采用定性和描述性分析进行分析。结果:共分析了106篇文献。大多数研究仅使用ΔEab测量颜色变化(10.4%),评估上颌中切牙的颜色变化(45.3%),并包括一个月的随访(25.4%)。发表的论文主要来自巴西的研究(51.9%)。在牙齿漂白的临床试验中使用了许多方法,并且观察到各种各样的仪器用于测量颜色变化。临床意义:最近牙齿漂白临床试验的方法学标准差异较大,使得不同研究之间的数据比较困难,需要制定牙齿漂白临床研究指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A systematic scoping review of color evaluation methods of recently published tooth bleaching clinical trials.

Purpose: This systematic scoping review aimed to survey the literature to answer the following questions: which instruments were used to measure the color change; which teeth were assessed for color; what was the follow-up period, and in which country was the recently published tooth bleaching clinical trial performed?

Methods: This research was registered in the Open Science Framework. The following databases were searched: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and LILACS. Randomized clinical trials evaluating tooth bleaching with color change analysis, published between 2021 and 2017, were included. The data extracted from included studies were analyzed using a qualitative and descriptive analysis.

Results: 106 articles were analyzed. Most studies used only ΔEab to measure the color change (10.4%), assessed the color change in the maxillary central incisors (45.3%), and included a one-month follow-up (25.4%). The published papers were mostly from research performed in Brazil (51.9%). Many methods have been used in the tooth bleaching clinical trials examined, and a wide variety of instruments used to measure the color change was observed.

Clinical significance: The large variation in the methodology criteria of most recent tooth bleaching clinical trials makes data comparison difficult among different studies and raises the need for a guideline for tooth bleaching clinical studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of dentistry
American journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.
期刊最新文献
A comparison of polishing systems and thermal cycling on the surface roughness and color stability of a single-shade resin composite. Charcoal dentifrices: A laboratory study of their safety and efficacy. Current landscape of research on whitening toothpastes and their effects on dental hard tissue. Effects of salivary contamination on the shear bond strengths of universal adhesives to dentin. Framework's marginal adaptation evaluation of fixed partial denture using conventional and digital impression techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1