抗生素对玉米芯固相反硝化的影响:反硝化和抗生素去除性能、机制和抗生素耐药基因

IF 6.9 Q1 Environmental Science Journal of environmental sciences Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jes.2022.10.020
Yanjie Zhang , Weiyang Dong , Congyu Li , Haiyan Wang , Huan Wang , Yu Ling , Guokai Yan , Yang Chang
{"title":"抗生素对玉米芯固相反硝化的影响:反硝化和抗生素去除性能、机制和抗生素耐药基因","authors":"Yanjie Zhang ,&nbsp;Weiyang Dong ,&nbsp;Congyu Li ,&nbsp;Haiyan Wang ,&nbsp;Huan Wang ,&nbsp;Yu Ling ,&nbsp;Guokai Yan ,&nbsp;Yang Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.jes.2022.10.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Solid-phase denitrification (SPD) has been used in wastewater treatment plant effluent to enhance nitrate removal, and antibiotics co-existing in the effluent is a common environmental problem. In this study, it was systematically investigated the effect of single trace sulfamethoxazole (SMX)/trimethoprim (TMP) and their mixture on microbial denitrification performance, the antibiotics removal, and antibiotics resistance genes (ARGs) in corncob supported SPD system. The average denitrification rate was improved by 46.90% or 61.09% with single 50 µg/L SMX or TMP, while there was no significant inhibition with mixed SMX and TMP. The abundance of dominant denitrifiers (Comamonadaceae family and <em>Azospia</em>) and fermentation bacteria (<em>Ancalomicrobium</em>) were consistent with the denitrification performance of different antibiotics groups. Single SMX and TMP achieved relatively higher denitrification gene and enzyme abundance. Mixed SMX and TMP improved the denitrification gene copies, but they reduced the key denitrification enzymes except for EC 1.7.7.2. Additionally, the removal efficiency of TMP (56.70% ± 3.18%) was higher than that of SMX (25.44% ± 2.62%) in single antibiotic group, and the existence of other antibiotics (i.e. SMX or TMP) had no significant impact on the TMP or SMX removal performance. Biodegradation was the main removal mechanism of SMX and TMP, while sludge and corncob adsorption contributed a little to their removal. SMX had the risk of sulfanilamide resistance genes (SRGs) dissemination. Furthermore, network analysis indicated that <em>Niveibacterium</em> and <em>Bradyrhizobium</em> were the potential hosts of SRGs, which promoted the horizontal transmission of ARGs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental sciences","volume":"130 ","pages":"Pages 24-36"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of antibiotics on corncob supported solid-phase denitrification: Denitrification and antibiotics removal performance, mechanism, and antibiotic resistance genes\",\"authors\":\"Yanjie Zhang ,&nbsp;Weiyang Dong ,&nbsp;Congyu Li ,&nbsp;Haiyan Wang ,&nbsp;Huan Wang ,&nbsp;Yu Ling ,&nbsp;Guokai Yan ,&nbsp;Yang Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jes.2022.10.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Solid-phase denitrification (SPD) has been used in wastewater treatment plant effluent to enhance nitrate removal, and antibiotics co-existing in the effluent is a common environmental problem. In this study, it was systematically investigated the effect of single trace sulfamethoxazole (SMX)/trimethoprim (TMP) and their mixture on microbial denitrification performance, the antibiotics removal, and antibiotics resistance genes (ARGs) in corncob supported SPD system. The average denitrification rate was improved by 46.90% or 61.09% with single 50 µg/L SMX or TMP, while there was no significant inhibition with mixed SMX and TMP. The abundance of dominant denitrifiers (Comamonadaceae family and <em>Azospia</em>) and fermentation bacteria (<em>Ancalomicrobium</em>) were consistent with the denitrification performance of different antibiotics groups. Single SMX and TMP achieved relatively higher denitrification gene and enzyme abundance. Mixed SMX and TMP improved the denitrification gene copies, but they reduced the key denitrification enzymes except for EC 1.7.7.2. Additionally, the removal efficiency of TMP (56.70% ± 3.18%) was higher than that of SMX (25.44% ± 2.62%) in single antibiotic group, and the existence of other antibiotics (i.e. SMX or TMP) had no significant impact on the TMP or SMX removal performance. Biodegradation was the main removal mechanism of SMX and TMP, while sludge and corncob adsorption contributed a little to their removal. SMX had the risk of sulfanilamide resistance genes (SRGs) dissemination. Furthermore, network analysis indicated that <em>Niveibacterium</em> and <em>Bradyrhizobium</em> were the potential hosts of SRGs, which promoted the horizontal transmission of ARGs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of environmental sciences\",\"volume\":\"130 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 24-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of environmental sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1089\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1001074222005095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1001074222005095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

固相反硝化(SPD)已被应用于污水处理厂的废水中,以提高硝酸盐的去除率,而废水中共存的抗生素是一个常见的环境问题。本研究系统地研究了单微量磺胺甲恶唑(SMX)/甲氧苄啶(TMP)及其混合物对玉米芯支持的SPD系统中微生物脱氮性能、抗生素去除和抗生素抗性基因(ARGs)的影响。单用50µg/L的SMX或TMP可使平均脱氮率提高46.90%或61.09%,而混合使用SMX和TMP则没有显著的抑制作用。优势反硝化菌(Comamonadaceae科和Azospia)和发酵菌(Ancalomobium)的丰度与不同抗生素组的反硝化性能一致。单一的SMX和TMP获得了相对较高的反硝化基因和酶丰度。SMX和TMP混合提高了反硝化基因的拷贝数,但降低了除EC 1.7.7.2外的关键反硝化酶。此外,单一抗生素组TMP的去除率(56.70%±3.18%)高于SMX(25.44%±2.62%),其他抗生素(即SMX或TMP)的存在对TMP或SMX的去除性能没有显著影响。生物降解是SMX和TMP的主要去除机理,污泥和玉米芯吸附对其去除作用不大。SMX具有磺胺耐药基因(SRGs)传播的风险。此外,网络分析表明,Niveibacterium和Bradyrhizobium是SRGs的潜在宿主,促进了ARGs的水平传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of antibiotics on corncob supported solid-phase denitrification: Denitrification and antibiotics removal performance, mechanism, and antibiotic resistance genes

Solid-phase denitrification (SPD) has been used in wastewater treatment plant effluent to enhance nitrate removal, and antibiotics co-existing in the effluent is a common environmental problem. In this study, it was systematically investigated the effect of single trace sulfamethoxazole (SMX)/trimethoprim (TMP) and their mixture on microbial denitrification performance, the antibiotics removal, and antibiotics resistance genes (ARGs) in corncob supported SPD system. The average denitrification rate was improved by 46.90% or 61.09% with single 50 µg/L SMX or TMP, while there was no significant inhibition with mixed SMX and TMP. The abundance of dominant denitrifiers (Comamonadaceae family and Azospia) and fermentation bacteria (Ancalomicrobium) were consistent with the denitrification performance of different antibiotics groups. Single SMX and TMP achieved relatively higher denitrification gene and enzyme abundance. Mixed SMX and TMP improved the denitrification gene copies, but they reduced the key denitrification enzymes except for EC 1.7.7.2. Additionally, the removal efficiency of TMP (56.70% ± 3.18%) was higher than that of SMX (25.44% ± 2.62%) in single antibiotic group, and the existence of other antibiotics (i.e. SMX or TMP) had no significant impact on the TMP or SMX removal performance. Biodegradation was the main removal mechanism of SMX and TMP, while sludge and corncob adsorption contributed a little to their removal. SMX had the risk of sulfanilamide resistance genes (SRGs) dissemination. Furthermore, network analysis indicated that Niveibacterium and Bradyrhizobium were the potential hosts of SRGs, which promoted the horizontal transmission of ARGs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of environmental sciences
Journal of environmental sciences Environmental Science (General)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Environmental Sciences is an international peer-reviewed journal established in 1989. It is sponsored by the Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and it is jointly published by Elsevier and Science Press. It aims to foster interdisciplinary communication and promote understanding of significant environmental issues. The journal seeks to publish significant and novel research on the fate and behaviour of emerging contaminants, human impact on the environment, human exposure to environmental contaminants and their health effects, and environmental remediation and management. Original research articles, critical reviews, highlights, and perspectives of high quality are published both in print and online.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Core-shell design of UiO66-Fe3O4 configured with EDTA-assisted washing for rapid adsorption and simple recovery of heavy metal pollutants from soil Exposure to methylparaben at environmentally realistic concentrations significantly impairs neuronal health in adult zebrafish Diamine-modified porous indium frameworks with crystalline porous materials (CPM)-5 structure for carbon dioxide fixation under co-catalyst and solvent free conditions Estimation of surface ozone concentration over Jiangsu province using a high-performance deep learning model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1