[Covid-19急诊和远程医疗:法医环境下的多家庭心理教育干预]

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Rivista di psichiatria Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1708/4022.39975
Marco Lombardi, Roberta Ortenzi, Jessica Sanna, Martina Pecorari, Maria Chiara Scenti, Cristina Iannini, Brunella Lagrotteria, Cristina Mancini, Giovanna Paoletti, Giuseppe Nicolò
{"title":"[Covid-19急诊和远程医疗:法医环境下的多家庭心理教育干预]","authors":"Marco Lombardi,&nbsp;Roberta Ortenzi,&nbsp;Jessica Sanna,&nbsp;Martina Pecorari,&nbsp;Maria Chiara Scenti,&nbsp;Cristina Iannini,&nbsp;Brunella Lagrotteria,&nbsp;Cristina Mancini,&nbsp;Giovanna Paoletti,&nbsp;Giuseppe Nicolò","doi":"10.1708/4022.39975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim is to describe remote multifamily psychoeducational intervention led by REMS \"Castore\" team (an Italian health care facility for offenders who suffer from mental disorders and socially dangerous) in ASL Roma 5, a local health authority, during covid-19 emergency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The applied theoretical models have been the integrated psychoeducational intervention by I. Falloon and the multifamily psychoeducational intervention based on problem solving by F. Veltro. The multifamily psychoeducational intervention was attempted by inpatients' relatives from June to August 2020 with 8 weekly meetings of 90' each led by two psychiatric rehabilitation therapists and healthcare experts. Six families were involved in the study and its members were assessed by questionnaire on family problems, Brief-COPE and general health questionnaire tests. Users were assessed by Level of Expressed Emotion Scale test for their expressed emotion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data analysis highlighted the general low level of subjective and objective burden for family members in association with a high perception of that support provided by REMS. Furthermore, the study has shown those coping approaches oriented to the research of practical solutions, acceptance of events and assertive communication.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The low subjective and objective burden may be attributed to implicit security conditions in REMS and the absence of tasks mainly carried out by experts. Those coping styles oriented to more practical than emotional approaches suggest an emotional hyper control or stigma perception leading to isolation and loneliness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The multifamily psychoeducational intervention has allowed a trustworthy relationship with REMS. Considering that the families involved in the study have never benefited by other psychoeducational interventions before, their early involvement appears to be a potential tool for preventing and managing crisis as well as minimizing recidivism.</p>","PeriodicalId":21506,"journal":{"name":"Rivista di psichiatria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Covid-19 emergency and telemedicine: multifamily psychoeducational intervention in a forensic setting.]\",\"authors\":\"Marco Lombardi,&nbsp;Roberta Ortenzi,&nbsp;Jessica Sanna,&nbsp;Martina Pecorari,&nbsp;Maria Chiara Scenti,&nbsp;Cristina Iannini,&nbsp;Brunella Lagrotteria,&nbsp;Cristina Mancini,&nbsp;Giovanna Paoletti,&nbsp;Giuseppe Nicolò\",\"doi\":\"10.1708/4022.39975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim is to describe remote multifamily psychoeducational intervention led by REMS \\\"Castore\\\" team (an Italian health care facility for offenders who suffer from mental disorders and socially dangerous) in ASL Roma 5, a local health authority, during covid-19 emergency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The applied theoretical models have been the integrated psychoeducational intervention by I. Falloon and the multifamily psychoeducational intervention based on problem solving by F. Veltro. The multifamily psychoeducational intervention was attempted by inpatients' relatives from June to August 2020 with 8 weekly meetings of 90' each led by two psychiatric rehabilitation therapists and healthcare experts. Six families were involved in the study and its members were assessed by questionnaire on family problems, Brief-COPE and general health questionnaire tests. Users were assessed by Level of Expressed Emotion Scale test for their expressed emotion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data analysis highlighted the general low level of subjective and objective burden for family members in association with a high perception of that support provided by REMS. Furthermore, the study has shown those coping approaches oriented to the research of practical solutions, acceptance of events and assertive communication.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The low subjective and objective burden may be attributed to implicit security conditions in REMS and the absence of tasks mainly carried out by experts. Those coping styles oriented to more practical than emotional approaches suggest an emotional hyper control or stigma perception leading to isolation and loneliness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The multifamily psychoeducational intervention has allowed a trustworthy relationship with REMS. Considering that the families involved in the study have never benefited by other psychoeducational interventions before, their early involvement appears to be a potential tool for preventing and managing crisis as well as minimizing recidivism.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rivista di psichiatria\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rivista di psichiatria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1708/4022.39975\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rivista di psichiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1708/4022.39975","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目的是描述在2019冠状病毒病紧急情况下,由REMS“Castore”团队(意大利一家为患有精神障碍和社会危险的罪犯提供医疗服务的机构)在当地卫生当局ASL Roma 5领导的远程多家庭心理教育干预。方法:应用的理论模型有I. Falloon的综合心理教育干预和F. Veltro的基于问题解决的多家庭心理教育干预。2020年6月至8月,住院患者家属尝试多家庭心理教育干预,每周8次,每次90次,由2名精神康复治疗师和卫生保健专家主持。本研究涉及6个家庭,通过家庭问题问卷、Brief-COPE和一般健康问卷测试对其成员进行评估。通过情绪表达水平量表测试对用户的情绪表达进行评估。结果:数据分析表明,家庭成员的主观和客观负担水平普遍较低,并且对REMS提供的支持有较高的认识。此外,研究还显示了以研究实际解决方案、接受事件和自信沟通为导向的应对方法。讨论:主观和客观负担较低可能是由于REMS的隐性安全条件和缺乏主要由专家进行的任务。这些应对方式倾向于更实际的而不是情绪化的方法,表明情绪上的过度控制或耻辱感会导致孤立和孤独。结论:多家庭心理教育干预与REMS之间存在信任关系。考虑到参与研究的家庭以前从未从其他心理教育干预中受益,他们的早期参与似乎是预防和管理危机以及减少再犯的潜在工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Covid-19 emergency and telemedicine: multifamily psychoeducational intervention in a forensic setting.]

Aim: The aim is to describe remote multifamily psychoeducational intervention led by REMS "Castore" team (an Italian health care facility for offenders who suffer from mental disorders and socially dangerous) in ASL Roma 5, a local health authority, during covid-19 emergency.

Methods: The applied theoretical models have been the integrated psychoeducational intervention by I. Falloon and the multifamily psychoeducational intervention based on problem solving by F. Veltro. The multifamily psychoeducational intervention was attempted by inpatients' relatives from June to August 2020 with 8 weekly meetings of 90' each led by two psychiatric rehabilitation therapists and healthcare experts. Six families were involved in the study and its members were assessed by questionnaire on family problems, Brief-COPE and general health questionnaire tests. Users were assessed by Level of Expressed Emotion Scale test for their expressed emotion.

Results: Data analysis highlighted the general low level of subjective and objective burden for family members in association with a high perception of that support provided by REMS. Furthermore, the study has shown those coping approaches oriented to the research of practical solutions, acceptance of events and assertive communication.

Discussion: The low subjective and objective burden may be attributed to implicit security conditions in REMS and the absence of tasks mainly carried out by experts. Those coping styles oriented to more practical than emotional approaches suggest an emotional hyper control or stigma perception leading to isolation and loneliness.

Conclusions: The multifamily psychoeducational intervention has allowed a trustworthy relationship with REMS. Considering that the families involved in the study have never benefited by other psychoeducational interventions before, their early involvement appears to be a potential tool for preventing and managing crisis as well as minimizing recidivism.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rivista di psichiatria
Rivista di psichiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.70%
发文量
31
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gli interessi della rivista riguardano l’approfondimento delle interazioni tra mente e malattia, la validazione e la discussione dei nuovi strumenti e parametri di classificazione diagnostica, la verifica delle prospettive terapeutiche farmacologiche e non.
期刊最新文献
[Taking care of minor offenders: between methodological practices and experience.] Group psychoeducation for patients with bipolar disorder: a retrospective study on effectiveness in delaying relapse episodes and intensity. 'I Can't Get No Satisfaction'… Experience in the treatment, satisfaction, and professional support of young depressed people using SPARX. Problematic use of Internet in a sample of psychiatric outpatients: preliminary observations from the "real world". Suicide-risk-related factors in a psychiatric patient cohort: a cross sectional study on outpatients, inpatients, and therapeutic community patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1