Meghan George, Joshua R Guilfoyle, Jennifer R Steele, C W Struthers
{"title":"一个抱歉的道歉借口:研究人们对道歉脸的心理表征。","authors":"Meghan George, Joshua R Guilfoyle, Jennifer R Steele, C W Struthers","doi":"10.1007/s10919-022-00422-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The goal of the current research was to gain an understanding of people's mental representations of an apologetic face. In Study 1, participants' responses were used to generate visual templates of apologetic faces through reverse correlation (Study 1a, <i>n</i> = 121), and a new set of participants (Study 1b, <i>n</i> = 37 and 1c, <i>n</i> = 153) rated that image (group-level Classification Image, CI), as well as either the inverse image (group-level anti-CI in Study 1b) or base face (in Study 1c), on apology-related characteristics. Results demonstrated that people have a mental representation of an apologetic face, and that sadness is an important feature of this template. To examine similarities between mental representations of apologetic and sad faces, participants in Study 2 generated visual templates of sad faces using reverse correlation (Study 2a, <i>n</i> = 121). New participants (Study 2b, <i>n</i> = 162) were then randomly assigned to rate the averaged face, eyes, and mouths (group-level CIs) as well as the individual visual templates (individual-level CIs) generated from both studies for either how apologetic or sad they appeared. Visual templates of apologetic and sad faces were seen as apologetic, providing evidence of the prominence of sadness in mental representations of apology.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10919-022-00422-5.</p>","PeriodicalId":47747,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nonverbal Behavior","volume":"47 1","pages":"57-81"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9803897/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Sorry Excuse for an Apology: Examining People's Mental Representations of an Apologetic Face.\",\"authors\":\"Meghan George, Joshua R Guilfoyle, Jennifer R Steele, C W Struthers\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10919-022-00422-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The goal of the current research was to gain an understanding of people's mental representations of an apologetic face. In Study 1, participants' responses were used to generate visual templates of apologetic faces through reverse correlation (Study 1a, <i>n</i> = 121), and a new set of participants (Study 1b, <i>n</i> = 37 and 1c, <i>n</i> = 153) rated that image (group-level Classification Image, CI), as well as either the inverse image (group-level anti-CI in Study 1b) or base face (in Study 1c), on apology-related characteristics. Results demonstrated that people have a mental representation of an apologetic face, and that sadness is an important feature of this template. To examine similarities between mental representations of apologetic and sad faces, participants in Study 2 generated visual templates of sad faces using reverse correlation (Study 2a, <i>n</i> = 121). New participants (Study 2b, <i>n</i> = 162) were then randomly assigned to rate the averaged face, eyes, and mouths (group-level CIs) as well as the individual visual templates (individual-level CIs) generated from both studies for either how apologetic or sad they appeared. Visual templates of apologetic and sad faces were seen as apologetic, providing evidence of the prominence of sadness in mental representations of apology.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10919-022-00422-5.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nonverbal Behavior\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"57-81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9803897/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nonverbal Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-022-00422-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nonverbal Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-022-00422-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
当前研究的目的是了解人们对道歉脸的心理表征。在研究1中,参与者的反应被用来通过反向相关(研究1a, n = 121)来生成道歉脸的视觉模板,一组新的参与者(研究1b, n = 37和1c, n = 153)对该图像(群体水平分类图像,CI)以及反图像(研究1b中群体水平反CI)或基础脸(研究1c)进行道歉相关特征的评分。结果表明,人们对道歉的脸有一个心理表征,而悲伤是这个模板的一个重要特征。为了检验道歉和悲伤表情的心理表征之间的相似性,研究2中的参与者使用反向相关法生成了悲伤表情的视觉模板(研究2a, n = 121)。然后,新参与者(研究2b, n = 162)被随机分配给平均的面部、眼睛和嘴巴(群体水平ci),以及两项研究产生的个人视觉模板(个人水平ci),以评估他们表现出的道歉或悲伤程度。道歉和悲伤面孔的视觉模板被视为道歉,这为悲伤在道歉的心理表征中的突出地位提供了证据。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,下载地址:10.1007/s10919-022-00422-5。
A Sorry Excuse for an Apology: Examining People's Mental Representations of an Apologetic Face.
The goal of the current research was to gain an understanding of people's mental representations of an apologetic face. In Study 1, participants' responses were used to generate visual templates of apologetic faces through reverse correlation (Study 1a, n = 121), and a new set of participants (Study 1b, n = 37 and 1c, n = 153) rated that image (group-level Classification Image, CI), as well as either the inverse image (group-level anti-CI in Study 1b) or base face (in Study 1c), on apology-related characteristics. Results demonstrated that people have a mental representation of an apologetic face, and that sadness is an important feature of this template. To examine similarities between mental representations of apologetic and sad faces, participants in Study 2 generated visual templates of sad faces using reverse correlation (Study 2a, n = 121). New participants (Study 2b, n = 162) were then randomly assigned to rate the averaged face, eyes, and mouths (group-level CIs) as well as the individual visual templates (individual-level CIs) generated from both studies for either how apologetic or sad they appeared. Visual templates of apologetic and sad faces were seen as apologetic, providing evidence of the prominence of sadness in mental representations of apology.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10919-022-00422-5.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior presents peer-reviewed original theoretical and empirical research on all major areas of nonverbal behavior. Specific topics include paralanguage, proxemics, facial expressions, eye contact, face-to-face interaction, and nonverbal emotional expression, as well as other subjects which contribute to the scientific understanding of nonverbal processes and behavior.