CMACTM - D叶片气管插管对模拟颈椎损伤的部分声门观察与全声门观察:一项随机对照试验。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Expert Review of Medical Devices Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1080/17434440.2023.2174850
Chao Chia Cheong, Soon Yiu Ong, Siu Min Lim, Wan Zakaria Wan A, Marzida Mansor, Sook Hui Chaw
{"title":"CMACTM - D叶片气管插管对模拟颈椎损伤的部分声门观察与全声门观察:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Chao Chia Cheong,&nbsp;Soon Yiu Ong,&nbsp;Siu Min Lim,&nbsp;Wan Zakaria Wan A,&nbsp;Marzida Mansor,&nbsp;Sook Hui Chaw","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2023.2174850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A previous study reported a shorter time to tracheal intubation by reducing percentage of glottic opening (POGO) view to <50% when intubating a normal adult airway using the Glidescope<sup>TM</sup> blade. We evaluate the efficacy of reducing POGO to <50% when intubating patients with rigid cervical immobilization using CMAC<sup>TM</sup> D blade.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and four adult patients were randomized to group POGO 100% or POGO <50% . Laryngoscopy was performed by advancing tip of the D blade at vallecula. POGO 100% was achieved by exerting upward force to displace epiglottis until glottic opening from the anterior commissure to inter arytenoid notch. POGO < 50% was acquired by withdrawing the D blade tip dorsally from vallecula. The primary outcome was time to intubation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median time (IQR) to successful intubation was 29 (25-35) seconds for group POGO < 50% and 34 (28-40) seconds for group with POGO 100% (difference in medians, 5 seconds; 95% confidence interval, 2 to 8, p = 0.003). Complications were minor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using the CMAC<sup>TM</sup> D blade with a reduced POGO in patients with cervical spine immobilization resulted in faster tracheal intubation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial is registered at ClinicalTrial.gov (CT.gov identifier: NCT04833166).</p>","PeriodicalId":12330,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Medical Devices","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Partial vs full glottic view with CMAC<sup>TM</sup> D blade intubation of airway with simulated cervical spine injury: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Chao Chia Cheong,&nbsp;Soon Yiu Ong,&nbsp;Siu Min Lim,&nbsp;Wan Zakaria Wan A,&nbsp;Marzida Mansor,&nbsp;Sook Hui Chaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17434440.2023.2174850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A previous study reported a shorter time to tracheal intubation by reducing percentage of glottic opening (POGO) view to <50% when intubating a normal adult airway using the Glidescope<sup>TM</sup> blade. We evaluate the efficacy of reducing POGO to <50% when intubating patients with rigid cervical immobilization using CMAC<sup>TM</sup> D blade.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and four adult patients were randomized to group POGO 100% or POGO <50% . Laryngoscopy was performed by advancing tip of the D blade at vallecula. POGO 100% was achieved by exerting upward force to displace epiglottis until glottic opening from the anterior commissure to inter arytenoid notch. POGO < 50% was acquired by withdrawing the D blade tip dorsally from vallecula. The primary outcome was time to intubation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median time (IQR) to successful intubation was 29 (25-35) seconds for group POGO < 50% and 34 (28-40) seconds for group with POGO 100% (difference in medians, 5 seconds; 95% confidence interval, 2 to 8, p = 0.003). Complications were minor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using the CMAC<sup>TM</sup> D blade with a reduced POGO in patients with cervical spine immobilization resulted in faster tracheal intubation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The trial is registered at ClinicalTrial.gov (CT.gov identifier: NCT04833166).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Medical Devices\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Medical Devices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2023.2174850\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Medical Devices","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2023.2174850","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:先前的一项研究报道了通过减少声门开口(POGO)视野到TM刀片的百分比来缩短气管插管时间。我们评估了将POGO还原为TM D刀片的疗效。结果:POGO < 50%组插管成功的中位时间(IQR)为29(25-35)秒,POGO 100%组插管成功的中位时间(IQR)为34(28-40)秒(中位差异为5秒;95%置信区间,2 ~ 8,p = 0.003)。并发症很少。结论:颈椎固定患者使用CMACTM - D刀片降低POGO可加快气管插管速度。试验注册:该试验在ClinicalTrial.gov (CT.gov标识符:NCT04833166)上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Partial vs full glottic view with CMACTM D blade intubation of airway with simulated cervical spine injury: a randomized controlled trial.

Purpose: A previous study reported a shorter time to tracheal intubation by reducing percentage of glottic opening (POGO) view to <50% when intubating a normal adult airway using the GlidescopeTM blade. We evaluate the efficacy of reducing POGO to <50% when intubating patients with rigid cervical immobilization using CMACTM D blade.

Methods: One hundred and four adult patients were randomized to group POGO 100% or POGO <50% . Laryngoscopy was performed by advancing tip of the D blade at vallecula. POGO 100% was achieved by exerting upward force to displace epiglottis until glottic opening from the anterior commissure to inter arytenoid notch. POGO < 50% was acquired by withdrawing the D blade tip dorsally from vallecula. The primary outcome was time to intubation.

Results: The median time (IQR) to successful intubation was 29 (25-35) seconds for group POGO < 50% and 34 (28-40) seconds for group with POGO 100% (difference in medians, 5 seconds; 95% confidence interval, 2 to 8, p = 0.003). Complications were minor.

Conclusion: Using the CMACTM D blade with a reduced POGO in patients with cervical spine immobilization resulted in faster tracheal intubation.

Trial registration: The trial is registered at ClinicalTrial.gov (CT.gov identifier: NCT04833166).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Medical Devices
Expert Review of Medical Devices 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal serves the device research community by providing a comprehensive body of high-quality information from leading experts, all subject to rigorous peer review. The Expert Review format is specially structured to optimize the value of the information to reader. Comprehensive coverage by each author in a key area of research or clinical practice is augmented by the following sections: Expert commentary - a personal view on the most effective or promising strategies Five-year view - a clear perspective of future prospects within a realistic timescale Key issues - an executive summary cutting to the author''s most critical points In addition to the Review program, each issue also features Medical Device Profiles - objective assessments of specific devices in development or clinical use to help inform clinical practice. There are also Perspectives - overviews highlighting areas of current debate and controversy, together with reports from the conference scene and invited Editorials.
期刊最新文献
Future perspectives and challenges of artificial intelligence implementation in remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices. His bundle pacing combined with atrioventricular node ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Complications after peripherally inserted central catheter versus central venous catheter implantation in intensive care unit: propensity score analysis using a nationwide database. Thoracic impedance monitoring in heart failure: from theory to practice. Dynamic versus standard bougies for tracheal intubation with direct or indirect laryngoscopy in simulated or real scenarios: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1