评估下一代测序对再植前使用抗生素间隔物患者的诊断准确性。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopedics Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-02 DOI:10.3928/01477447-20230426-09
Beau J Kildow, Niall Cochrane, Patrick J Kelly, Jeffrey A O'Donnell, Mark Wu, Elizabeth Lyden, William A Jiranek, Thorsten M Seyler
{"title":"评估下一代测序对再植前使用抗生素间隔物患者的诊断准确性。","authors":"Beau J Kildow, Niall Cochrane, Patrick J Kelly, Jeffrey A O'Donnell, Mark Wu, Elizabeth Lyden, William A Jiranek, Thorsten M Seyler","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20230426-09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Use of molecular sequencing modalities in periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis and organism identification has gained popularity recently. To date, there is no diagnostic test that reliably predicts infection eradication in patients with antibiotic spacers. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of next-generation sequencing (NGS), culture, the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria, and the criteria by Parvizi et al in patients with antibiotic spacers. In this retrospective study, aspirate or tissue samples were collected from 38 knee and 19 hip antibiotic spacers for routine diagnostic workup for the presence of persistent infection and sent to the laboratory for NGS. The kappa statistic along with statistical differences between diagnostic studies were calculated using the chi-square test for categorical data. The kappa coefficient for agreement between NGS and culture was 0.27 (fair agreement). The percentages of positive and negative agreement were 22.8% and 42.1%, respectively, with a total concordance of 64.9%. There were 12 samples that were culture positive and NGS negative. Eight samples were NGS positive but culture negative. The kappa coefficient was 0.42 (moderate agreement) when comparing NGS with MSIS criteria. In our series, NGS did not provide sufficient agreement compared with culture or MSIS criteria in the setting of an antibiotic spacer. A reliable diagnostic indicator for reimplantation has yet to be identified. [<i>Orthopedics</i>. 2024;47(1);46-51.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Next-Generation Sequencing in Patients With Antibiotic Spacers Before Reimplantation.\",\"authors\":\"Beau J Kildow, Niall Cochrane, Patrick J Kelly, Jeffrey A O'Donnell, Mark Wu, Elizabeth Lyden, William A Jiranek, Thorsten M Seyler\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/01477447-20230426-09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Use of molecular sequencing modalities in periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis and organism identification has gained popularity recently. To date, there is no diagnostic test that reliably predicts infection eradication in patients with antibiotic spacers. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of next-generation sequencing (NGS), culture, the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria, and the criteria by Parvizi et al in patients with antibiotic spacers. In this retrospective study, aspirate or tissue samples were collected from 38 knee and 19 hip antibiotic spacers for routine diagnostic workup for the presence of persistent infection and sent to the laboratory for NGS. The kappa statistic along with statistical differences between diagnostic studies were calculated using the chi-square test for categorical data. The kappa coefficient for agreement between NGS and culture was 0.27 (fair agreement). The percentages of positive and negative agreement were 22.8% and 42.1%, respectively, with a total concordance of 64.9%. There were 12 samples that were culture positive and NGS negative. Eight samples were NGS positive but culture negative. The kappa coefficient was 0.42 (moderate agreement) when comparing NGS with MSIS criteria. In our series, NGS did not provide sufficient agreement compared with culture or MSIS criteria in the setting of an antibiotic spacer. A reliable diagnostic indicator for reimplantation has yet to be identified. [<i>Orthopedics</i>. 2024;47(1);46-51.].</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopedics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20230426-09\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20230426-09","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在假体周围关节感染诊断和病原体鉴定中使用分子测序模式近来越来越受欢迎。迄今为止,还没有一种诊断测试能可靠地预测使用抗生素垫片患者的感染根除情况。本研究旨在比较新一代测序(NGS)、培养、肌肉骨骼感染协会(MSIS)标准和 Parvizi 等人的标准对抗生素垫片患者的诊断准确性。在这项回顾性研究中,从 38 名膝关节和 19 名髋关节抗生素垫块患者身上采集了抽吸物或组织样本,用于常规诊断是否存在持续性感染,并送往实验室进行 NGS 检测。对分类数据采用卡方检验(chi-square test)计算卡方统计量以及诊断研究之间的统计差异。NGS 与培养之间的卡帕系数为 0.27(相当一致)。阳性一致率为 22.8%,阴性一致率为 42.1%,总一致率为 64.9%。有 12 份样本的培养阳性而 NGS 阴性。8 个样本 NGS 阳性,但培养阴性。将 NGS 与 MSIS 标准进行比较,卡帕系数为 0.42(中度一致)。在我们的系列研究中,在使用抗生素垫片的情况下,NGS 与培养或 MSIS 标准相比并不能提供足够的一致性。再植的可靠诊断指标尚未确定。[Orthopedics. 2024;47(1);46-51.].
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Next-Generation Sequencing in Patients With Antibiotic Spacers Before Reimplantation.

Use of molecular sequencing modalities in periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis and organism identification has gained popularity recently. To date, there is no diagnostic test that reliably predicts infection eradication in patients with antibiotic spacers. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of next-generation sequencing (NGS), culture, the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria, and the criteria by Parvizi et al in patients with antibiotic spacers. In this retrospective study, aspirate or tissue samples were collected from 38 knee and 19 hip antibiotic spacers for routine diagnostic workup for the presence of persistent infection and sent to the laboratory for NGS. The kappa statistic along with statistical differences between diagnostic studies were calculated using the chi-square test for categorical data. The kappa coefficient for agreement between NGS and culture was 0.27 (fair agreement). The percentages of positive and negative agreement were 22.8% and 42.1%, respectively, with a total concordance of 64.9%. There were 12 samples that were culture positive and NGS negative. Eight samples were NGS positive but culture negative. The kappa coefficient was 0.42 (moderate agreement) when comparing NGS with MSIS criteria. In our series, NGS did not provide sufficient agreement compared with culture or MSIS criteria in the setting of an antibiotic spacer. A reliable diagnostic indicator for reimplantation has yet to be identified. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(1);46-51.].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopedics
Orthopedics 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 40 years, Orthopedics, a bimonthly peer-reviewed journal, has been the preferred choice of orthopedic surgeons for clinically relevant information on all aspects of adult and pediatric orthopedic surgery and treatment. Edited by Robert D''Ambrosia, MD, Chairman of the Department of Orthopedics at the University of Colorado, Denver, and former President of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, as well as an Editorial Board of over 100 international orthopedists, Orthopedics is the source to turn to for guidance in your practice. The journal offers access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content. Highlights also include Blue Ribbon articles published full text in print and online, as well as Tips & Techniques posted with every issue.
期刊最新文献
The Relationship Between Surgeon Volume and Major Surgical Complications After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: An Evaluation of 3177 US Orthopedic Surgeons. Trends in Location of Death for Individuals With Primary Bone Tumors in the United States. Biologic Augmentation of Rotator Cuff Repair: Current Concepts Review. Age-Related Association Between Unilateral Single-Channel and Double-Channel Surgery and Postoperative Multifidus Muscle Atrophy and Fat Infiltration. Bizarre Parosteal Osteochondromatous Proliferation With Malignant Transformation and Metastases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1