症状检查器的用户体验:系统回顾

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium Pub Date : 2023-04-29 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01
Yue You, Renkai Ma, Xinning Gui
{"title":"症状检查器的用户体验:系统回顾","authors":"Yue You, Renkai Ma, Xinning Gui","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review reports the user experience of symptom checkers, aiming to characterize users studied in the existing literature, identify the aspects of user experience of symptom checkers that have been studied, and offer design suggestions. Our literature search resulted in 31 publications. We found that (1) most symptom checker users are relatively young; (2) eight relevant aspects of user experience have been explored, including motivation, trust, acceptability, satisfaction, accuracy, usability, safety/security, and functionality; (3) future symptom checkers should improve their accuracy, safety, and usability. Although many facets of user experience have been explored, methodological challenges exist and some important aspects of user experience remain understudied. Further research should be conducted to explore users' needs and the context of use. More qualitative and mixed-method studies are needed to understand actual users' experiences in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":72180,"journal":{"name":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10148318/pdf/64.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"User Experience of Symptom Checkers: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Yue You, Renkai Ma, Xinning Gui\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This review reports the user experience of symptom checkers, aiming to characterize users studied in the existing literature, identify the aspects of user experience of symptom checkers that have been studied, and offer design suggestions. Our literature search resulted in 31 publications. We found that (1) most symptom checker users are relatively young; (2) eight relevant aspects of user experience have been explored, including motivation, trust, acceptability, satisfaction, accuracy, usability, safety/security, and functionality; (3) future symptom checkers should improve their accuracy, safety, and usability. Although many facets of user experience have been explored, methodological challenges exist and some important aspects of user experience remain understudied. Further research should be conducted to explore users' needs and the context of use. More qualitative and mixed-method studies are needed to understand actual users' experiences in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10148318/pdf/64.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本综述报告了症状检查器的用户体验,旨在描述现有文献中研究的用户特征,确定已研究过的症状检查器用户体验的各个方面,并提供设计建议。通过文献检索,我们找到了 31 篇文献。我们发现:(1) 大多数症状检查器的用户都相对年轻;(2) 对用户体验的八个相关方面进行了探讨,包括动机、信任、可接受性、满意度、准确性、可用性、安全性和功能性;(3) 未来的症状检查器应提高其准确性、安全性和可用性。尽管已经对用户体验的许多方面进行了探索,但在方法论上仍存在挑战,而且用户体验的一些重要方面仍未得到充分研究。应进一步开展研究,探索用户的需求和使用环境。今后需要开展更多的定性和混合方法研究,以了解用户的实际体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
User Experience of Symptom Checkers: A Systematic Review.

This review reports the user experience of symptom checkers, aiming to characterize users studied in the existing literature, identify the aspects of user experience of symptom checkers that have been studied, and offer design suggestions. Our literature search resulted in 31 publications. We found that (1) most symptom checker users are relatively young; (2) eight relevant aspects of user experience have been explored, including motivation, trust, acceptability, satisfaction, accuracy, usability, safety/security, and functionality; (3) future symptom checkers should improve their accuracy, safety, and usability. Although many facets of user experience have been explored, methodological challenges exist and some important aspects of user experience remain understudied. Further research should be conducted to explore users' needs and the context of use. More qualitative and mixed-method studies are needed to understand actual users' experiences in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards Fair Patient-Trial Matching via Patient-Criterion Level Fairness Constraint. Towards Understanding the Generalization of Medical Text-to-SQL Models and Datasets. Transferable and Interpretable Treatment Effectiveness Prediction for Ovarian Cancer via Multimodal Deep Learning. Understanding Cancer Caregiving and Predicting Burden: An Analytics and Machine Learning Approach. Usability and Recall Evaluation of Virtual Reality Ontology Object Manipulation (VROOM) System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1