虚拟现实游戏中眼球运动和双眼差异的统计:对头显设计的启示。

IF 7.8 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING ACM Transactions on Graphics Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1145/3549529
Avi M Aizenman, George A Koulieris, Agostino Gibaldi, Vibhor Sehgal, Dennis M Levi, Martin S Banks
{"title":"虚拟现实游戏中眼球运动和双眼差异的统计:对头显设计的启示。","authors":"Avi M Aizenman,&nbsp;George A Koulieris,&nbsp;Agostino Gibaldi,&nbsp;Vibhor Sehgal,&nbsp;Dennis M Levi,&nbsp;Martin S Banks","doi":"10.1145/3549529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The human visual system evolved in environments with statistical regularities. Binocular vision is adapted to these such that depth perception and eye movements are more precise, faster, and performed comfortably in environments consistent with the regularities. We measured the statistics of eye movements and binocular disparities in virtual-reality (VR) - gaming environments and found that they are quite different from those in the natural environment. Fixation distance and direction are more restricted in VR, and fixation distance is farther. The pattern of disparity across the visual field is less regular in VR and does not conform to a prominent property of naturally occurring disparities. From this we predict that double vision is more likely in VR than in the natural environment. We also determined the optimal screen distance to minimize discomfort due to the vergence-accommodation conflict, and the optimal nasal-temporal positioning of head-mounted display (HMD) screens to maximize binocular field of view. Finally, in a user study we investigated how VR content affects comfort and performance. Content that is more consistent with the statistics of the natural world yields less discomfort than content that is not. Furthermore, consistent content yields slightly better performance than inconsistent content.</p>","PeriodicalId":50913,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Graphics","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10139447/pdf/","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Statistics of Eye Movements and Binocular Disparities during VR Gaming: Implications for Headset Design.\",\"authors\":\"Avi M Aizenman,&nbsp;George A Koulieris,&nbsp;Agostino Gibaldi,&nbsp;Vibhor Sehgal,&nbsp;Dennis M Levi,&nbsp;Martin S Banks\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3549529\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The human visual system evolved in environments with statistical regularities. Binocular vision is adapted to these such that depth perception and eye movements are more precise, faster, and performed comfortably in environments consistent with the regularities. We measured the statistics of eye movements and binocular disparities in virtual-reality (VR) - gaming environments and found that they are quite different from those in the natural environment. Fixation distance and direction are more restricted in VR, and fixation distance is farther. The pattern of disparity across the visual field is less regular in VR and does not conform to a prominent property of naturally occurring disparities. From this we predict that double vision is more likely in VR than in the natural environment. We also determined the optimal screen distance to minimize discomfort due to the vergence-accommodation conflict, and the optimal nasal-temporal positioning of head-mounted display (HMD) screens to maximize binocular field of view. Finally, in a user study we investigated how VR content affects comfort and performance. Content that is more consistent with the statistics of the natural world yields less discomfort than content that is not. Furthermore, consistent content yields slightly better performance than inconsistent content.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Graphics\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10139447/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Graphics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3549529\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Graphics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3549529","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

人类的视觉系统是在具有统计规律的环境中进化的。双目视觉适应了这些,因此深度感知和眼球运动更精确、更快,并且在符合规律的环境中表现得更舒适。我们测量了虚拟现实(VR)游戏环境中眼球运动和双眼差异的统计数据,发现它们与自然环境中的眼睛运动和双眼差异很大。在VR中,注视距离和注视方向受到更多的限制,注视距离更远。在VR中,整个视野的视差模式不太规则,不符合自然发生的视差的突出属性。由此我们预测,与自然环境相比,虚拟现实中更有可能出现双重视觉。我们还确定了最佳屏幕距离,以最大限度地减少因趋近调节冲突引起的不适,以及头戴式显示器(HMD)屏幕的最佳鼻颞定位,以最大化双眼视野。最后,在一项用户研究中,我们调查了VR内容如何影响舒适度和性能。与自然世界的统计数据更一致的内容比不一致的内容产生更少的不适。此外,一致的内容比不一致的内容产生稍好的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Statistics of Eye Movements and Binocular Disparities during VR Gaming: Implications for Headset Design.

The human visual system evolved in environments with statistical regularities. Binocular vision is adapted to these such that depth perception and eye movements are more precise, faster, and performed comfortably in environments consistent with the regularities. We measured the statistics of eye movements and binocular disparities in virtual-reality (VR) - gaming environments and found that they are quite different from those in the natural environment. Fixation distance and direction are more restricted in VR, and fixation distance is farther. The pattern of disparity across the visual field is less regular in VR and does not conform to a prominent property of naturally occurring disparities. From this we predict that double vision is more likely in VR than in the natural environment. We also determined the optimal screen distance to minimize discomfort due to the vergence-accommodation conflict, and the optimal nasal-temporal positioning of head-mounted display (HMD) screens to maximize binocular field of view. Finally, in a user study we investigated how VR content affects comfort and performance. Content that is more consistent with the statistics of the natural world yields less discomfort than content that is not. Furthermore, consistent content yields slightly better performance than inconsistent content.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Graphics
ACM Transactions on Graphics 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
25.80%
发文量
193
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that aims to disseminate the latest findings of note in the field of computer graphics. It has been published since 1982 by the Association for Computing Machinery. Starting in 2003, all papers accepted for presentation at the annual SIGGRAPH conference are printed in a special summer issue of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Direct Manipulation of Procedural Implicit Surfaces 3DGSR: Implicit Surface Reconstruction with 3D Gaussian Splatting Quark: Real-time, High-resolution, and General Neural View Synthesis Differentiable Owen Scrambling ELMO: Enhanced Real-time LiDAR Motion Capture through Upsampling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1