单发和多发甲状腺结节作为恶性肿瘤的预测因子:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 1.9 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Thyroid Research Pub Date : 2022-12-05 DOI:10.1186/s13044-022-00140-6
Aqeeb Ur Rehman, Muhammad Ehsan, Haseeba Javed, Muhammad Zain Ameer, Aleenah Mohsin, Muhammad Aemaz Ur Rehman, Ahmad Nawaz, Zunaira Amjad, Fatima Ameer
{"title":"单发和多发甲状腺结节作为恶性肿瘤的预测因子:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Aqeeb Ur Rehman,&nbsp;Muhammad Ehsan,&nbsp;Haseeba Javed,&nbsp;Muhammad Zain Ameer,&nbsp;Aleenah Mohsin,&nbsp;Muhammad Aemaz Ur Rehman,&nbsp;Ahmad Nawaz,&nbsp;Zunaira Amjad,&nbsp;Fatima Ameer","doi":"10.1186/s13044-022-00140-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The debate on whether or not there is a difference in the incidence of thyroid cancer between the patients with Solitary thyroid Nodule (STN) and Multinodular Goiter (MNG) has been constantly present for the last few decades. With newer studies yielding mixed results, it was imperative to systematically compile all available literature on the topic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, ScienceDirect, GoogleScholar, International Clinical Trials registry, and reference lists of the included articles were systematically searched for article retrieval. No filter was applied in terms of time, study design, language or country of publication. Rigorous screening as per PRISMA guidelines was undertaken by 2 independent reviewers in order to identify the articles that were most relevant to the topic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two studies spanning from 1992 to 2018 were included in this analysis and encompassed 50,321 patients, 44.2% of which belonged to the STN subgroup and 55.37% to the MNG subgroup. MNG was found to be associated with a significantly lower risk of thyroid cancer (OR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.61-0.96) when compared with STN. Papillary carcinoma was the most frequently occurring carcinoma across both groups, followed by follicular and medullary carcinomas. A subgroup analysis was performed to assess the efficacy of the two most commonly employed diagnostic tools i.e. surgery and fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), however it yielded nonsignificant results, indicating a comparable usefulness of the two. Another subgroup analysis run on the basis of the presumed iodine status of the participants also yielded nonsignificant results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a higher incidence of thyroid cancer among patients of STN, however, given the low quality of existing evidence on the topic, it is crucial to conduct larger studies that can establish association with a greater precision.</p>","PeriodicalId":39048,"journal":{"name":"Thyroid Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720983/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Solitary and multiple thyroid nodules as predictors of malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Aqeeb Ur Rehman,&nbsp;Muhammad Ehsan,&nbsp;Haseeba Javed,&nbsp;Muhammad Zain Ameer,&nbsp;Aleenah Mohsin,&nbsp;Muhammad Aemaz Ur Rehman,&nbsp;Ahmad Nawaz,&nbsp;Zunaira Amjad,&nbsp;Fatima Ameer\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13044-022-00140-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The debate on whether or not there is a difference in the incidence of thyroid cancer between the patients with Solitary thyroid Nodule (STN) and Multinodular Goiter (MNG) has been constantly present for the last few decades. With newer studies yielding mixed results, it was imperative to systematically compile all available literature on the topic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, ScienceDirect, GoogleScholar, International Clinical Trials registry, and reference lists of the included articles were systematically searched for article retrieval. No filter was applied in terms of time, study design, language or country of publication. Rigorous screening as per PRISMA guidelines was undertaken by 2 independent reviewers in order to identify the articles that were most relevant to the topic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two studies spanning from 1992 to 2018 were included in this analysis and encompassed 50,321 patients, 44.2% of which belonged to the STN subgroup and 55.37% to the MNG subgroup. MNG was found to be associated with a significantly lower risk of thyroid cancer (OR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.61-0.96) when compared with STN. Papillary carcinoma was the most frequently occurring carcinoma across both groups, followed by follicular and medullary carcinomas. A subgroup analysis was performed to assess the efficacy of the two most commonly employed diagnostic tools i.e. surgery and fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), however it yielded nonsignificant results, indicating a comparable usefulness of the two. Another subgroup analysis run on the basis of the presumed iodine status of the participants also yielded nonsignificant results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a higher incidence of thyroid cancer among patients of STN, however, given the low quality of existing evidence on the topic, it is crucial to conduct larger studies that can establish association with a greater precision.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thyroid Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720983/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thyroid Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13044-022-00140-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thyroid Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13044-022-00140-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:近几十年来,关于单发甲状腺结节(STN)和多结节性甲状腺肿(MNG)患者甲状腺癌发病率是否存在差异的争论一直存在。由于较新的研究产生了不同的结果,系统地汇编有关该主题的所有可用文献是必要的。方法:系统检索PubMed/MEDLINE、Cochrane Central、ScienceDirect、GoogleScholar、International Clinical Trials registry和纳入文章的参考文献列表,进行文章检索。没有在时间、研究设计、语言或出版国家方面进行筛选。2名独立审稿人根据PRISMA指南进行了严格的筛选,以确定与该主题最相关的文章。结果:该分析纳入了1992年至2018年的22项研究,共纳入50321例患者,其中44.2%属于STN亚组,55.37%属于MNG亚组。发现MNG与甲状腺癌风险显著降低相关(OR = 0.76;95% CI 0.61-0.96)。乳头状癌是两组中最常见的癌症,其次是滤泡癌和髓样癌。进行亚组分析以评估两种最常用的诊断工具(即手术和细针穿刺细胞学(FNAC))的疗效,但结果不显著,表明两者的有用性相当。另一个基于假定的参与者碘状态的亚组分析也产生了不显著的结果。结论:甲状腺癌在STN患者中发病率较高,但鉴于现有证据质量较低,开展更大规模的研究以更精确地建立相关性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Solitary and multiple thyroid nodules as predictors of malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The debate on whether or not there is a difference in the incidence of thyroid cancer between the patients with Solitary thyroid Nodule (STN) and Multinodular Goiter (MNG) has been constantly present for the last few decades. With newer studies yielding mixed results, it was imperative to systematically compile all available literature on the topic.

Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, ScienceDirect, GoogleScholar, International Clinical Trials registry, and reference lists of the included articles were systematically searched for article retrieval. No filter was applied in terms of time, study design, language or country of publication. Rigorous screening as per PRISMA guidelines was undertaken by 2 independent reviewers in order to identify the articles that were most relevant to the topic.

Results: Twenty-two studies spanning from 1992 to 2018 were included in this analysis and encompassed 50,321 patients, 44.2% of which belonged to the STN subgroup and 55.37% to the MNG subgroup. MNG was found to be associated with a significantly lower risk of thyroid cancer (OR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.61-0.96) when compared with STN. Papillary carcinoma was the most frequently occurring carcinoma across both groups, followed by follicular and medullary carcinomas. A subgroup analysis was performed to assess the efficacy of the two most commonly employed diagnostic tools i.e. surgery and fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), however it yielded nonsignificant results, indicating a comparable usefulness of the two. Another subgroup analysis run on the basis of the presumed iodine status of the participants also yielded nonsignificant results.

Conclusion: There is a higher incidence of thyroid cancer among patients of STN, however, given the low quality of existing evidence on the topic, it is crucial to conduct larger studies that can establish association with a greater precision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Thyroid Research
Thyroid Research Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
21
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Losartan is more effective than angiotensin (1-7) in preventing thyroxine-induced renal injury in the rat. The diagnostic performance of neck ultrasound in follow-up of advanced stage differentiated thyroid cancer. Sonographic characteristics of thyroid nodules with a Halo. Correlation between gene mutations and clinical characteristics in papillary thyroid cancer: a retrospective analysis of BRAF mutations and RET rearrangements. Identification of LINC02454-related key pathways and genes in papillary thyroid cancer by weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1