智力和发育障碍者的支持需求、支持和结果的检查。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1352/1934-9556-61.1.65
Parthenia Dinora, Seb M Prohn, Matthew Bogenschutz, Michael D Broda, Sarah Lineberry, Angela West
{"title":"智力和发育障碍者的支持需求、支持和结果的检查。","authors":"Parthenia Dinora,&nbsp;Seb M Prohn,&nbsp;Matthew Bogenschutz,&nbsp;Michael D Broda,&nbsp;Sarah Lineberry,&nbsp;Angela West","doi":"10.1352/1934-9556-61.1.65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Researchers used a merged dataset to examine if more resources were expended on those with greater support needs and if support needs impacted personal outcomes when controlling for relevant personal and contextual factors. Results indicated that the amount of support a person receives had a direct relationship to their needs. However, we also found that people with the greatest needs had weaker personal outcomes suggesting that distribution of resources based on need may not result in equivalent outcomes. The authors suggest strategies at an individual and systems level to address the outcomes gap for people with the greatest support needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47489,"journal":{"name":"Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Examination of Support Needs, Supports, and Outcomes for People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.\",\"authors\":\"Parthenia Dinora,&nbsp;Seb M Prohn,&nbsp;Matthew Bogenschutz,&nbsp;Michael D Broda,&nbsp;Sarah Lineberry,&nbsp;Angela West\",\"doi\":\"10.1352/1934-9556-61.1.65\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Researchers used a merged dataset to examine if more resources were expended on those with greater support needs and if support needs impacted personal outcomes when controlling for relevant personal and contextual factors. Results indicated that the amount of support a person receives had a direct relationship to their needs. However, we also found that people with the greatest needs had weaker personal outcomes suggesting that distribution of resources based on need may not result in equivalent outcomes. The authors suggest strategies at an individual and systems level to address the outcomes gap for people with the greatest support needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-61.1.65\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-61.1.65","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究人员使用合并的数据集来检查是否有更多的资源花费在那些更需要支持的人身上,以及在控制相关的个人和环境因素时,支持需求是否会影响个人结果。结果表明,一个人得到的支持的数量与他们的需求有直接的关系。然而,我们也发现有最大需求的人的个人结果较弱,这表明基于需求的资源分配可能不会产生相同的结果。作者提出了个人和系统层面的策略,以解决最需要支持的人的结果差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Examination of Support Needs, Supports, and Outcomes for People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.

Researchers used a merged dataset to examine if more resources were expended on those with greater support needs and if support needs impacted personal outcomes when controlling for relevant personal and contextual factors. Results indicated that the amount of support a person receives had a direct relationship to their needs. However, we also found that people with the greatest needs had weaker personal outcomes suggesting that distribution of resources based on need may not result in equivalent outcomes. The authors suggest strategies at an individual and systems level to address the outcomes gap for people with the greatest support needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities is dedicated to meeting the information needs of those who seek effective ways to help people with mental retardation. The journal reports new teaching approaches, program developments, administrative tools, program evaluation, service utilization studies, community surveys, public policy issues, training and case studies, and current research in mental retardation. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities is a peer-reviewed journal whose consulting editors represent a broad spectrum of settings: universities, research centers, public and private residential care facilities, and specialized community service agencies.
期刊最新文献
"I Know How to Get Around Your 'No'": A Follow-Up of the FACES Psychoeducational Intervention. Capturing Staff Perspectives on Quality Interaction With Clients With Intellectual Disability: A Diary Study. Effect of a Nurses' Training Program on Early Detection of Egyptian Children With Developmental Disabilities in Assiut Governorate. Empowering Healthcare Professionals: Exploring Experiences Leading a Violence Prevention Course for Adults With Intellectual Disability. Preliminary Reliability and Validity of the Self-Determination Inventory: Student Report French Translation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1