跨国制药公司在研发投资上欺骗加拿大:是时候寻求其他选择了吗?

Q2 Medicine Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.12927/hcpol.2023.27038
Shoo K Lee, Sukhy K Mahl, Jessica J Green, Joel Lexchin
{"title":"跨国制药公司在研发投资上欺骗加拿大:是时候寻求其他选择了吗?","authors":"Shoo K Lee,&nbsp;Sukhy K Mahl,&nbsp;Jessica J Green,&nbsp;Joel Lexchin","doi":"10.12927/hcpol.2023.27038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 1987, the government passed legislation to protect brand-name pharmaceutical firms against competition from generic drug brands in exchange for economic investment in Canadian pharmaceutical research and development (R&D). Since 2002, brand-name pharmaceutical companies' R&D investments have fallen short of their commitment, while Canadians now pay the fourth highest drug prices of all the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries. In this article, we examine the degree to which brand-name pharmaceutical companies have fallen short of their promises, discuss whether a patent policy is the best strategy to secure Canadian pharmaceutical R&D funding and propose practical alternatives to this arrangement.</p>","PeriodicalId":39389,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 3","pages":"17-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/36/f0/policy-18-017.PMC10019517.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multinational Pharmaceutical Companies Shortchange Canada in Research and Development Investments: Is It Time to Pursue Other Options?\",\"authors\":\"Shoo K Lee,&nbsp;Sukhy K Mahl,&nbsp;Jessica J Green,&nbsp;Joel Lexchin\",\"doi\":\"10.12927/hcpol.2023.27038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In 1987, the government passed legislation to protect brand-name pharmaceutical firms against competition from generic drug brands in exchange for economic investment in Canadian pharmaceutical research and development (R&D). Since 2002, brand-name pharmaceutical companies' R&D investments have fallen short of their commitment, while Canadians now pay the fourth highest drug prices of all the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries. In this article, we examine the degree to which brand-name pharmaceutical companies have fallen short of their promises, discuss whether a patent policy is the best strategy to secure Canadian pharmaceutical R&D funding and propose practical alternatives to this arrangement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"17-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/36/f0/policy-18-017.PMC10019517.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2023.27038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2023.27038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

1987年,政府通过立法保护名牌制药公司免受仿制药品牌的竞争,以换取对加拿大制药研发(R&D)的经济投资。自2002年以来,知名制药公司的研发投资未能兑现承诺,而加拿大目前的药价在经济合作与发展组织(oecd)所有成员国中排名第四。在本文中,我们考察了知名制药公司未能兑现承诺的程度,讨论了专利政策是否是确保加拿大制药研发资金的最佳策略,并提出了这种安排的实际替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multinational Pharmaceutical Companies Shortchange Canada in Research and Development Investments: Is It Time to Pursue Other Options?

In 1987, the government passed legislation to protect brand-name pharmaceutical firms against competition from generic drug brands in exchange for economic investment in Canadian pharmaceutical research and development (R&D). Since 2002, brand-name pharmaceutical companies' R&D investments have fallen short of their commitment, while Canadians now pay the fourth highest drug prices of all the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries. In this article, we examine the degree to which brand-name pharmaceutical companies have fallen short of their promises, discuss whether a patent policy is the best strategy to secure Canadian pharmaceutical R&D funding and propose practical alternatives to this arrangement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare Policy
Healthcare Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
"Whatever Job I'm In, I'm Going to Find a Way to Make a Difference" - A Black Community Leader's Perspective on Engagement and Advocacy. "You Can't Let Go" - A Black Community Leader's Perspective on Engagement and Advocacy. Black Community Health Advocates in Ontario: A Look at Health Policy Engagement From the Ground Up. Engaging Canadians in Health Policy Is no Trivial Matter. Ethical and Transformative Scholarly Public Engagement: Pitfalls, Possibilities and Promises.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1