{"title":"使用Geant4蒙特卡罗代码进行高剂量率近距离治疗的微选择电子铱-192和弹性钴-60源的剂量学比较。","authors":"Tsige Yhidego Gebremariam, Ghazale Geraily, Hussam Hameed Jassim, Somayeh Gholami","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2023.126238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Manufacturing of miniaturized high activity iridium-192 (<sup>192</sup>Ir) sources have been made a market preference in modern brachytherapy. Smaller dimensions of the sources are flexible for smaller diameter of the applicators, and it is also suitable for interstitial implants. Presently, cobalt-60 (<sup>60</sup>Co) sources have been commercialized as an alternative to <sup>192</sup>Ir sources for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy, since <sup>60</sup>Co source have an advantage of longer half-life comparing with <sup>192</sup>Ir source. One of them is the HDR <sup>60</sup>Co Flexisource manufactured by Elekta. The purpose of this study was to compare the TG-43 dosimetric parameters of HDR flexi <sup>60</sup>Co and HDR microSelectron <sup>192</sup>Ir sources.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Monte Carlo simulation code of Geant4 (v.11.0) was applied. Following the recommendations of AAPM TG-43 formalism report, Monte Carlo code of HDR flexi <sup>60</sup>Co and HDR microSelectron <sup>192</sup>Ir was validated by calculating radial dose function, anisotropy function, and dose-rate constants in a water phantom. Finally, results of both radionuclide sources were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The calculated dose-rate constants per unit air-kerma strength in water medium were 1.108 cGy h<sup>-1</sup>U<sup>-1</sup> for HDR microSelectron <sup>192</sup>Ir, and 1.097 cGy h<sup>-1</sup>U<sup>-1</sup> for HDR flexi <sup>60</sup>Co source, with the percentage uncertainty of 1.1% and 0.2%, respectively. The values of radial dose function for distances above 22 cm for HDR flexi <sup>60</sup>Co source were higher than that of the other source. The anisotropic values sharply increased to the longitudinal sides of HDR flexi <sup>60</sup>Co source, and the rise was comparatively sharper to that of the other source.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The primary photons from the lower-energy HDR microSelectron <sup>192</sup>Ir source have a limited range and are partially attenuated when considering the results of radial and anisotropic dose distribution functions. This implies that a HDR flexi <sup>60</sup>Co radionuclide could be used to treat tumors beyond the source compared with a HDR microSelectron <sup>192</sup>Ir source, despite the fact that <sup>192</sup>Ir has a lower exit dose than HDR flexi <sup>60</sup>Co radionuclide source.</p>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":"15 2","pages":"141-147"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/df/67/JCB-15-50437.PMC10196727.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dosimetric comparison between microSelectron iridium-192 and flexi cobalt-60 sources in high-dose-rate brachytherapy using Geant4 Monte Carlo code.\",\"authors\":\"Tsige Yhidego Gebremariam, Ghazale Geraily, Hussam Hameed Jassim, Somayeh Gholami\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/jcb.2023.126238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Manufacturing of miniaturized high activity iridium-192 (<sup>192</sup>Ir) sources have been made a market preference in modern brachytherapy. Smaller dimensions of the sources are flexible for smaller diameter of the applicators, and it is also suitable for interstitial implants. Presently, cobalt-60 (<sup>60</sup>Co) sources have been commercialized as an alternative to <sup>192</sup>Ir sources for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy, since <sup>60</sup>Co source have an advantage of longer half-life comparing with <sup>192</sup>Ir source. One of them is the HDR <sup>60</sup>Co Flexisource manufactured by Elekta. The purpose of this study was to compare the TG-43 dosimetric parameters of HDR flexi <sup>60</sup>Co and HDR microSelectron <sup>192</sup>Ir sources.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Monte Carlo simulation code of Geant4 (v.11.0) was applied. Following the recommendations of AAPM TG-43 formalism report, Monte Carlo code of HDR flexi <sup>60</sup>Co and HDR microSelectron <sup>192</sup>Ir was validated by calculating radial dose function, anisotropy function, and dose-rate constants in a water phantom. Finally, results of both radionuclide sources were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The calculated dose-rate constants per unit air-kerma strength in water medium were 1.108 cGy h<sup>-1</sup>U<sup>-1</sup> for HDR microSelectron <sup>192</sup>Ir, and 1.097 cGy h<sup>-1</sup>U<sup>-1</sup> for HDR flexi <sup>60</sup>Co source, with the percentage uncertainty of 1.1% and 0.2%, respectively. The values of radial dose function for distances above 22 cm for HDR flexi <sup>60</sup>Co source were higher than that of the other source. The anisotropic values sharply increased to the longitudinal sides of HDR flexi <sup>60</sup>Co source, and the rise was comparatively sharper to that of the other source.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The primary photons from the lower-energy HDR microSelectron <sup>192</sup>Ir source have a limited range and are partially attenuated when considering the results of radial and anisotropic dose distribution functions. This implies that a HDR flexi <sup>60</sup>Co radionuclide could be used to treat tumors beyond the source compared with a HDR microSelectron <sup>192</sup>Ir source, despite the fact that <sup>192</sup>Ir has a lower exit dose than HDR flexi <sup>60</sup>Co radionuclide source.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"141-147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/df/67/JCB-15-50437.PMC10196727.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2023.126238\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2023.126238","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dosimetric comparison between microSelectron iridium-192 and flexi cobalt-60 sources in high-dose-rate brachytherapy using Geant4 Monte Carlo code.
Purpose: Manufacturing of miniaturized high activity iridium-192 (192Ir) sources have been made a market preference in modern brachytherapy. Smaller dimensions of the sources are flexible for smaller diameter of the applicators, and it is also suitable for interstitial implants. Presently, cobalt-60 (60Co) sources have been commercialized as an alternative to 192Ir sources for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy, since 60Co source have an advantage of longer half-life comparing with 192Ir source. One of them is the HDR 60Co Flexisource manufactured by Elekta. The purpose of this study was to compare the TG-43 dosimetric parameters of HDR flexi 60Co and HDR microSelectron 192Ir sources.
Material and methods: Monte Carlo simulation code of Geant4 (v.11.0) was applied. Following the recommendations of AAPM TG-43 formalism report, Monte Carlo code of HDR flexi 60Co and HDR microSelectron 192Ir was validated by calculating radial dose function, anisotropy function, and dose-rate constants in a water phantom. Finally, results of both radionuclide sources were compared.
Results: The calculated dose-rate constants per unit air-kerma strength in water medium were 1.108 cGy h-1U-1 for HDR microSelectron 192Ir, and 1.097 cGy h-1U-1 for HDR flexi 60Co source, with the percentage uncertainty of 1.1% and 0.2%, respectively. The values of radial dose function for distances above 22 cm for HDR flexi 60Co source were higher than that of the other source. The anisotropic values sharply increased to the longitudinal sides of HDR flexi 60Co source, and the rise was comparatively sharper to that of the other source.
Conclusions: The primary photons from the lower-energy HDR microSelectron 192Ir source have a limited range and are partially attenuated when considering the results of radial and anisotropic dose distribution functions. This implies that a HDR flexi 60Co radionuclide could be used to treat tumors beyond the source compared with a HDR microSelectron 192Ir source, despite the fact that 192Ir has a lower exit dose than HDR flexi 60Co radionuclide source.
期刊介绍:
The “Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy” is an international and multidisciplinary journal that will publish papers of original research as well as reviews of articles. Main subjects of the journal include: clinical brachytherapy, combined modality treatment, advances in radiobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as physical aspects relevant to brachytherapy, particularly in the field of imaging, dosimetry and radiation therapy planning. Original contributions will include experimental studies of combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization and normal tissue protection, molecular radiation biology, and clinical investigations of cancer treatment in brachytherapy. Another field of interest will be the educational part of the journal.