使用Geant4蒙特卡罗代码进行高剂量率近距离治疗的微选择电子铱-192和弹性钴-60源的剂量学比较。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.5114/jcb.2023.126238
Tsige Yhidego Gebremariam, Ghazale Geraily, Hussam Hameed Jassim, Somayeh Gholami
{"title":"使用Geant4蒙特卡罗代码进行高剂量率近距离治疗的微选择电子铱-192和弹性钴-60源的剂量学比较。","authors":"Tsige Yhidego Gebremariam,&nbsp;Ghazale Geraily,&nbsp;Hussam Hameed Jassim,&nbsp;Somayeh Gholami","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2023.126238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Manufacturing of miniaturized high activity iridium-192 (<sup>192</sup>Ir) sources have been made a market preference in modern brachytherapy. Smaller dimensions of the sources are flexible for smaller diameter of the applicators, and it is also suitable for interstitial implants. Presently, cobalt-60 (<sup>60</sup>Co) sources have been commercialized as an alternative to <sup>192</sup>Ir sources for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy, since <sup>60</sup>Co source have an advantage of longer half-life comparing with <sup>192</sup>Ir source. One of them is the HDR <sup>60</sup>Co Flexisource manufactured by Elekta. The purpose of this study was to compare the TG-43 dosimetric parameters of HDR flexi <sup>60</sup>Co and HDR microSelectron <sup>192</sup>Ir sources.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Monte Carlo simulation code of Geant4 (v.11.0) was applied. Following the recommendations of AAPM TG-43 formalism report, Monte Carlo code of HDR flexi <sup>60</sup>Co and HDR microSelectron <sup>192</sup>Ir was validated by calculating radial dose function, anisotropy function, and dose-rate constants in a water phantom. Finally, results of both radionuclide sources were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The calculated dose-rate constants per unit air-kerma strength in water medium were 1.108 cGy h<sup>-1</sup>U<sup>-1</sup> for HDR microSelectron <sup>192</sup>Ir, and 1.097 cGy h<sup>-1</sup>U<sup>-1</sup> for HDR flexi <sup>60</sup>Co source, with the percentage uncertainty of 1.1% and 0.2%, respectively. The values of radial dose function for distances above 22 cm for HDR flexi <sup>60</sup>Co source were higher than that of the other source. The anisotropic values sharply increased to the longitudinal sides of HDR flexi <sup>60</sup>Co source, and the rise was comparatively sharper to that of the other source.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The primary photons from the lower-energy HDR microSelectron <sup>192</sup>Ir source have a limited range and are partially attenuated when considering the results of radial and anisotropic dose distribution functions. This implies that a HDR flexi <sup>60</sup>Co radionuclide could be used to treat tumors beyond the source compared with a HDR microSelectron <sup>192</sup>Ir source, despite the fact that <sup>192</sup>Ir has a lower exit dose than HDR flexi <sup>60</sup>Co radionuclide source.</p>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":"15 2","pages":"141-147"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/df/67/JCB-15-50437.PMC10196727.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dosimetric comparison between microSelectron iridium-192 and flexi cobalt-60 sources in high-dose-rate brachytherapy using Geant4 Monte Carlo code.\",\"authors\":\"Tsige Yhidego Gebremariam,&nbsp;Ghazale Geraily,&nbsp;Hussam Hameed Jassim,&nbsp;Somayeh Gholami\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/jcb.2023.126238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Manufacturing of miniaturized high activity iridium-192 (<sup>192</sup>Ir) sources have been made a market preference in modern brachytherapy. Smaller dimensions of the sources are flexible for smaller diameter of the applicators, and it is also suitable for interstitial implants. Presently, cobalt-60 (<sup>60</sup>Co) sources have been commercialized as an alternative to <sup>192</sup>Ir sources for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy, since <sup>60</sup>Co source have an advantage of longer half-life comparing with <sup>192</sup>Ir source. One of them is the HDR <sup>60</sup>Co Flexisource manufactured by Elekta. The purpose of this study was to compare the TG-43 dosimetric parameters of HDR flexi <sup>60</sup>Co and HDR microSelectron <sup>192</sup>Ir sources.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Monte Carlo simulation code of Geant4 (v.11.0) was applied. Following the recommendations of AAPM TG-43 formalism report, Monte Carlo code of HDR flexi <sup>60</sup>Co and HDR microSelectron <sup>192</sup>Ir was validated by calculating radial dose function, anisotropy function, and dose-rate constants in a water phantom. Finally, results of both radionuclide sources were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The calculated dose-rate constants per unit air-kerma strength in water medium were 1.108 cGy h<sup>-1</sup>U<sup>-1</sup> for HDR microSelectron <sup>192</sup>Ir, and 1.097 cGy h<sup>-1</sup>U<sup>-1</sup> for HDR flexi <sup>60</sup>Co source, with the percentage uncertainty of 1.1% and 0.2%, respectively. The values of radial dose function for distances above 22 cm for HDR flexi <sup>60</sup>Co source were higher than that of the other source. The anisotropic values sharply increased to the longitudinal sides of HDR flexi <sup>60</sup>Co source, and the rise was comparatively sharper to that of the other source.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The primary photons from the lower-energy HDR microSelectron <sup>192</sup>Ir source have a limited range and are partially attenuated when considering the results of radial and anisotropic dose distribution functions. This implies that a HDR flexi <sup>60</sup>Co radionuclide could be used to treat tumors beyond the source compared with a HDR microSelectron <sup>192</sup>Ir source, despite the fact that <sup>192</sup>Ir has a lower exit dose than HDR flexi <sup>60</sup>Co radionuclide source.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"141-147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/df/67/JCB-15-50437.PMC10196727.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2023.126238\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2023.126238","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:小型化高活性铱-192 (192Ir)源的制造已成为现代近距离放射治疗的市场首选。较小尺寸的源对于较小直径的施加器是灵活的,并且它也适用于间隙植入物。目前,钴-60 (60Co)源已被商业化,作为192Ir源的替代品,用于高剂量率(HDR)近距离治疗,因为60Co源与192Ir源相比具有更长的半衰期。其中之一是Elekta生产的HDR 60Co Flexisource。本研究的目的是比较HDR flexi 60Co和HDR microSelectron 192Ir源的TG-43剂量学参数。材料与方法:采用genant4 (v.11.0)蒙特卡罗仿真代码。根据AAPM TG-43形式报告的建议,通过计算水幻影中的径向剂量函数、各向异性函数和剂量率常数,对HDR flexi 60Co和HDR microSelectron 192Ir的蒙特卡罗代码进行了验证。最后,对两种放射性核素源的结果进行了比较。结果:HDR微selectron 192Ir和HDR flexi 60Co源在水介质中单位空气强度的剂量率常数分别为1.108 cGy h-1U-1和1.097 cGy h-1U-1,百分比不确定度分别为1.1%和0.2%。HDR柔性60Co源在22 cm以上的径向剂量函数值高于其他源。HDR挠性60Co源纵向各向异性值急剧上升,且上升幅度相对其他源更为明显。结论:考虑径向和各向异性剂量分布函数的结果,低能HDR微电子192Ir源产生的初级光子范围有限,且部分衰减。这意味着,与HDR微选择192Ir源相比,HDR柔性60Co放射性核素可用于治疗源外肿瘤,尽管192Ir的退出剂量低于HDR柔性60Co放射性核素源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dosimetric comparison between microSelectron iridium-192 and flexi cobalt-60 sources in high-dose-rate brachytherapy using Geant4 Monte Carlo code.

Purpose: Manufacturing of miniaturized high activity iridium-192 (192Ir) sources have been made a market preference in modern brachytherapy. Smaller dimensions of the sources are flexible for smaller diameter of the applicators, and it is also suitable for interstitial implants. Presently, cobalt-60 (60Co) sources have been commercialized as an alternative to 192Ir sources for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy, since 60Co source have an advantage of longer half-life comparing with 192Ir source. One of them is the HDR 60Co Flexisource manufactured by Elekta. The purpose of this study was to compare the TG-43 dosimetric parameters of HDR flexi 60Co and HDR microSelectron 192Ir sources.

Material and methods: Monte Carlo simulation code of Geant4 (v.11.0) was applied. Following the recommendations of AAPM TG-43 formalism report, Monte Carlo code of HDR flexi 60Co and HDR microSelectron 192Ir was validated by calculating radial dose function, anisotropy function, and dose-rate constants in a water phantom. Finally, results of both radionuclide sources were compared.

Results: The calculated dose-rate constants per unit air-kerma strength in water medium were 1.108 cGy h-1U-1 for HDR microSelectron 192Ir, and 1.097 cGy h-1U-1 for HDR flexi 60Co source, with the percentage uncertainty of 1.1% and 0.2%, respectively. The values of radial dose function for distances above 22 cm for HDR flexi 60Co source were higher than that of the other source. The anisotropic values sharply increased to the longitudinal sides of HDR flexi 60Co source, and the rise was comparatively sharper to that of the other source.

Conclusions: The primary photons from the lower-energy HDR microSelectron 192Ir source have a limited range and are partially attenuated when considering the results of radial and anisotropic dose distribution functions. This implies that a HDR flexi 60Co radionuclide could be used to treat tumors beyond the source compared with a HDR microSelectron 192Ir source, despite the fact that 192Ir has a lower exit dose than HDR flexi 60Co radionuclide source.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The “Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy” is an international and multidisciplinary journal that will publish papers of original research as well as reviews of articles. Main subjects of the journal include: clinical brachytherapy, combined modality treatment, advances in radiobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as physical aspects relevant to brachytherapy, particularly in the field of imaging, dosimetry and radiation therapy planning. Original contributions will include experimental studies of combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization and normal tissue protection, molecular radiation biology, and clinical investigations of cancer treatment in brachytherapy. Another field of interest will be the educational part of the journal.
期刊最新文献
The role of EUS-guided iodine-125 seed implantation in patients with unresectable ampullary cancer after relief of obstructive jaundice Acute toxicity outcomes from salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after prior radiotherapy Differential outcomes of re-stratified high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiation therapy plus high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost A unified strategy to focal brachytherapy incorporating transperineal biopsy, image fusion, and real-time implantation with and without rectal spacer simulated in prostate phantoms Post-operative complications following dose adaptation of intra-operative electron beam radiation therapy in locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1