乳腺活检的前分析处理方案影响多基因小组结果

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY International Journal of Experimental Pathology Pub Date : 2022-05-15 DOI:10.1111/iep.12444
Vanessa Reinaldo Lima, Beatriz da Costa Aguiar Alves, Fernando Luiz Affonso Fonseca, Debora Krutman Zveibil, Auro del Giglio
{"title":"乳腺活检的前分析处理方案影响多基因小组结果","authors":"Vanessa Reinaldo Lima,&nbsp;Beatriz da Costa Aguiar Alves,&nbsp;Fernando Luiz Affonso Fonseca,&nbsp;Debora Krutman Zveibil,&nbsp;Auro del Giglio","doi":"10.1111/iep.12444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The creation of multigene panels for prognostic and predictive purposes allows a more accurate indication of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with breast cancer. In a previous study, we reproduced a multigene panel of 21 genes based on the commercial Oncotype-DX method. We submitted 183 embedded specimens obtained from breast surgery on patients with locoregional disease (stages I to III) between 2005 and 2010 performed at the Hospitals of the Medical School of the ABC Foundation. When we analysed the correlations between the score of the multigene panel and the progression-free interval (PFI) in all patients, we did not find a statistically significant association. However, when we selected only the 71 samples that had amplification of at least eight non-housekeeping genes, we observed that those with scores above the 75th percentile had a significantly lower PFI (<i>p</i> = .0054). Samples processed with nonbuffered formaldehyde were associated with a worse quality of extracted RNA (<i>p</i> = .004) and a significantly higher multigene panel score (<i>p</i> = .021). We conclude that variations in the pre-analytical processing of specimens destined for multigene panel amplification can significantly affect the results, with a potential impact on clinical management.</p>","PeriodicalId":14157,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Experimental Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-analytical processing protocol of breast biopsies affects multigene panel results\",\"authors\":\"Vanessa Reinaldo Lima,&nbsp;Beatriz da Costa Aguiar Alves,&nbsp;Fernando Luiz Affonso Fonseca,&nbsp;Debora Krutman Zveibil,&nbsp;Auro del Giglio\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/iep.12444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The creation of multigene panels for prognostic and predictive purposes allows a more accurate indication of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with breast cancer. In a previous study, we reproduced a multigene panel of 21 genes based on the commercial Oncotype-DX method. We submitted 183 embedded specimens obtained from breast surgery on patients with locoregional disease (stages I to III) between 2005 and 2010 performed at the Hospitals of the Medical School of the ABC Foundation. When we analysed the correlations between the score of the multigene panel and the progression-free interval (PFI) in all patients, we did not find a statistically significant association. However, when we selected only the 71 samples that had amplification of at least eight non-housekeeping genes, we observed that those with scores above the 75th percentile had a significantly lower PFI (<i>p</i> = .0054). Samples processed with nonbuffered formaldehyde were associated with a worse quality of extracted RNA (<i>p</i> = .004) and a significantly higher multigene panel score (<i>p</i> = .021). We conclude that variations in the pre-analytical processing of specimens destined for multigene panel amplification can significantly affect the results, with a potential impact on clinical management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Experimental Pathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Experimental Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iep.12444\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Experimental Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iep.12444","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用于预后和预测目的的多基因面板的创建可以为乳腺癌患者提供更准确的辅助化疗指示。在之前的一项研究中,我们基于商业Oncotype-DX方法复制了21个基因的多基因面板。我们提交了2005年至2010年间在ABC基金会医学院医院对局部疾病(I期至III期)患者进行乳房手术获得的183例包埋标本。当我们分析所有患者的多基因面板评分与无进展间期(PFI)之间的相关性时,我们没有发现统计学上显著的关联。然而,当我们只选择71个具有至少8个非管家基因扩增的样本时,我们观察到得分高于第75百分位的样本的PFI显著降低(p = 0.0054)。用非缓冲甲醛处理的样品与提取的RNA质量较差(p = 0.004)和显著较高的多基因面板评分相关(p = 0.021)。我们的结论是,用于多基因面板扩增的标本的前分析处理的变化会显著影响结果,并对临床管理产生潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pre-analytical processing protocol of breast biopsies affects multigene panel results

The creation of multigene panels for prognostic and predictive purposes allows a more accurate indication of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with breast cancer. In a previous study, we reproduced a multigene panel of 21 genes based on the commercial Oncotype-DX method. We submitted 183 embedded specimens obtained from breast surgery on patients with locoregional disease (stages I to III) between 2005 and 2010 performed at the Hospitals of the Medical School of the ABC Foundation. When we analysed the correlations between the score of the multigene panel and the progression-free interval (PFI) in all patients, we did not find a statistically significant association. However, when we selected only the 71 samples that had amplification of at least eight non-housekeeping genes, we observed that those with scores above the 75th percentile had a significantly lower PFI (p = .0054). Samples processed with nonbuffered formaldehyde were associated with a worse quality of extracted RNA (p = .004) and a significantly higher multigene panel score (p = .021). We conclude that variations in the pre-analytical processing of specimens destined for multigene panel amplification can significantly affect the results, with a potential impact on clinical management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Experimental Pathology encompasses the use of multidisciplinary scientific techniques to investigate the pathogenesis and progression of pathologic processes. The International Journal of Experimental Pathology - IJEP - publishes papers which afford new and imaginative insights into the basic mechanisms underlying human disease, including in vitro work, animal models, and clinical research. Aiming to report on work that addresses the common theme of mechanism at a cellular and molecular level, IJEP publishes both original experimental investigations and review articles. Recent themes for review series have covered topics as diverse as "Viruses and Cancer", "Granulomatous Diseases", "Stem cells" and "Cardiovascular Pathology".
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Thrombospondins: Conserved mediators and modulators of metazoan extracellular matrix Renal protective roles of macrophage matrix metalloproteinase-12 in mice with obstructed kidneys Feline hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Does the microRNA-mRNA regulatory network contribute to heart sarcomeric protein remodelling? Zinc transporter ZnT5 is associated with epithelial mesenchymal transition via SMAD1 in breast cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1