微创主动脉根部修复术的术前技术复杂性评估。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12195-6
Eduard Charchyan, Denis Breshenkov, Yuriy Belov
{"title":"微创主动脉根部修复术的术前技术复杂性评估。","authors":"Eduard Charchyan,&nbsp;Denis Breshenkov,&nbsp;Yuriy Belov","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12195-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess predictors of technical complexity of minimally invasive aortic root repairs (MIARR) performed through J-shaped mini-sternotomies in patients with aortic root aneurysm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 49 patients with aortic root aneurysm who underwent MIARR via an upper median J-shaped mini-sternotomy between January 2017 and April 2020. Preoperative high-resolution computed tomographic images synchronised with electrocardiography were mandatory for inclusion. Predictors of technical complexity were identified, and a scoring system was created. The correlation between technical complexity and intraoperative/postoperative parameters was explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant association between technical complexity and increased procedure time (Spearmen's ρ=-0.45, P=0.001), blood loss (Spearmen's ρ=-0.384, P=0.006), cardiopulmonary bypass time (Spearmen's ρ=-0.301, P=0.035), and postoperative bleeding (Spearmen's ρ=-0.265, P=0.066). The anatomical aorta-sternal relationship (distance of >22.1 mm in the axial plane between the midline of the sternotomy plane and the left coronary), distance between the sternal notch and the aortic valve annulus (>14.5 cm in the sagittal plane), distance between the skin and the left coronary artery (>9.53 cm in the axial plane), obesity (Body Mass Index >30), and-diameter at the brachiocephalic trunk level (>37 mm), were strongly associated with procedural complexity. Overall test accuracy was 75.5%, sensitivity was 73.1%, and specificity 78.3%. Finally, we created an online calculator that surgeons can use to determine the probability of a technically difficult of MIARR based on these factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This novel scoring system can be used to assess the technical complexity of minimally invasive aortic root repairs and to aid in preoperative planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":50245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative assessment of the technical complexity of minimally invasive aortic root repair.\",\"authors\":\"Eduard Charchyan,&nbsp;Denis Breshenkov,&nbsp;Yuriy Belov\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12195-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess predictors of technical complexity of minimally invasive aortic root repairs (MIARR) performed through J-shaped mini-sternotomies in patients with aortic root aneurysm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 49 patients with aortic root aneurysm who underwent MIARR via an upper median J-shaped mini-sternotomy between January 2017 and April 2020. Preoperative high-resolution computed tomographic images synchronised with electrocardiography were mandatory for inclusion. Predictors of technical complexity were identified, and a scoring system was created. The correlation between technical complexity and intraoperative/postoperative parameters was explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant association between technical complexity and increased procedure time (Spearmen's ρ=-0.45, P=0.001), blood loss (Spearmen's ρ=-0.384, P=0.006), cardiopulmonary bypass time (Spearmen's ρ=-0.301, P=0.035), and postoperative bleeding (Spearmen's ρ=-0.265, P=0.066). The anatomical aorta-sternal relationship (distance of >22.1 mm in the axial plane between the midline of the sternotomy plane and the left coronary), distance between the sternal notch and the aortic valve annulus (>14.5 cm in the sagittal plane), distance between the skin and the left coronary artery (>9.53 cm in the axial plane), obesity (Body Mass Index >30), and-diameter at the brachiocephalic trunk level (>37 mm), were strongly associated with procedural complexity. Overall test accuracy was 75.5%, sensitivity was 73.1%, and specificity 78.3%. Finally, we created an online calculator that surgeons can use to determine the probability of a technically difficult of MIARR based on these factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This novel scoring system can be used to assess the technical complexity of minimally invasive aortic root repairs and to aid in preoperative planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12195-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12195-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是评估通过j型微型胸骨切开术对主动脉根部动脉瘤患者进行微创主动脉根部修复(MIARR)技术复杂性的预测因素。方法:本研究纳入了2017年1月至2020年4月期间通过上正中j型迷你胸骨切开术接受MIARR的49例主动脉根动脉瘤患者。术前与心电图同步的高分辨率计算机断层扫描图像是纳入的必要条件。确定了技术复杂性的预测因子,并创建了一个评分系统。探讨技术复杂性与术中/术后参数之间的关系。结果:技术复杂性与手术时间(Spearmen’s ρ=-0.45, P=0.001)、出血量(Spearmen’s ρ=-0.384, P=0.006)、体外循环时间(Spearmen’s ρ=-0.301, P=0.035)和术后出血(Spearmen’s ρ=-0.265, P=0.066)显著相关。解剖上的主动脉-胸骨关系(胸骨切开面中线与左冠状动脉之间的轴向距离>22.1 mm)、胸骨切迹与主动脉瓣环之间的距离(矢状面>14.5 cm)、皮肤与左冠状动脉之间的距离(轴向距离>9.53 cm)、肥胖(体重指数>30)和头臂干水平的直径(>37 mm)与手术的复杂性密切相关。总体检测准确率为75.5%,灵敏度为73.1%,特异性为78.3%。最后,我们创建了一个在线计算器,外科医生可以根据这些因素来确定技术上困难的MIARR的概率。结论:这种新颖的评分系统可用于评估微创主动脉根部修复术的技术复杂性,并有助于术前规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preoperative assessment of the technical complexity of minimally invasive aortic root repair.

Background: The aim of this study was to assess predictors of technical complexity of minimally invasive aortic root repairs (MIARR) performed through J-shaped mini-sternotomies in patients with aortic root aneurysm.

Methods: This study included 49 patients with aortic root aneurysm who underwent MIARR via an upper median J-shaped mini-sternotomy between January 2017 and April 2020. Preoperative high-resolution computed tomographic images synchronised with electrocardiography were mandatory for inclusion. Predictors of technical complexity were identified, and a scoring system was created. The correlation between technical complexity and intraoperative/postoperative parameters was explored.

Results: There was a significant association between technical complexity and increased procedure time (Spearmen's ρ=-0.45, P=0.001), blood loss (Spearmen's ρ=-0.384, P=0.006), cardiopulmonary bypass time (Spearmen's ρ=-0.301, P=0.035), and postoperative bleeding (Spearmen's ρ=-0.265, P=0.066). The anatomical aorta-sternal relationship (distance of >22.1 mm in the axial plane between the midline of the sternotomy plane and the left coronary), distance between the sternal notch and the aortic valve annulus (>14.5 cm in the sagittal plane), distance between the skin and the left coronary artery (>9.53 cm in the axial plane), obesity (Body Mass Index >30), and-diameter at the brachiocephalic trunk level (>37 mm), were strongly associated with procedural complexity. Overall test accuracy was 75.5%, sensitivity was 73.1%, and specificity 78.3%. Finally, we created an online calculator that surgeons can use to determine the probability of a technically difficult of MIARR based on these factors.

Conclusions: This novel scoring system can be used to assess the technical complexity of minimally invasive aortic root repairs and to aid in preoperative planning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery publishes scientific papers on cardiac, thoracic and vascular surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Subclavian artery revascularization with subclavian-carotid transposition for TEVAR and non-TEVAR patients. Current perspectives in acute type B aortic dissections: a literature review. Long-term outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for the treatment of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Outcomes of Omniflow® II prosthesis used for revascularization in the femoral tract both in infected and non-infected setting. Frozen elephant trunk technique for aortic arch surgery: the Bordeaux University Hospital experience with Thoraflex hybrid prosthesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1