同一枚硬币的两面:时间压力的激励和抑制中介路径及其与压力的关系。

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Anxiety Stress and Coping Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-30 DOI:10.1080/10615806.2023.2183389
Anja Baethge, Ann-Kristin Menhardt, Yannick Frontzkowski, Miriam Schilbach
{"title":"同一枚硬币的两面:时间压力的激励和抑制中介路径及其与压力的关系。","authors":"Anja Baethge, Ann-Kristin Menhardt, Yannick Frontzkowski, Miriam Schilbach","doi":"10.1080/10615806.2023.2183389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Time pressure, commonly categorized a challenge stressor, consistently and positively relates to employees' experience of strain. However, regarding its relationship with motivational outcomes such as work engagement researchers have reported positive as well as negative effects.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Drawing on the challenge-hindrance framework, we introduce two explanatory mechanisms (i.e., a loss of time control and an increase of meaning in work) which may explain both, the consistent findings related to strain (here operationalized as irritation) as well as the diverse findings related to work engagement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a two-wave survey with a two-week time-lag. The final sample consisted of 232 participants. To test our hypotheses, we used structural equation modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Time pressure negatively and positively related to work engagement through loss of time control and meaning in work. Further, only loss of time control mediated the time pressure-irritation relationship.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results demonstrate that time pressure likely acts motivating and demotivating at the same time, only through different paths. Hence, our study provides an explanation for the heterogeneous findings regarding the relationship between time pressure and work engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":51415,"journal":{"name":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","volume":" ","pages":"86-99"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two sides of the same coin: motivating and demotivating mediation paths of time pressure and their relationship with strain.\",\"authors\":\"Anja Baethge, Ann-Kristin Menhardt, Yannick Frontzkowski, Miriam Schilbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10615806.2023.2183389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Time pressure, commonly categorized a challenge stressor, consistently and positively relates to employees' experience of strain. However, regarding its relationship with motivational outcomes such as work engagement researchers have reported positive as well as negative effects.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Drawing on the challenge-hindrance framework, we introduce two explanatory mechanisms (i.e., a loss of time control and an increase of meaning in work) which may explain both, the consistent findings related to strain (here operationalized as irritation) as well as the diverse findings related to work engagement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a two-wave survey with a two-week time-lag. The final sample consisted of 232 participants. To test our hypotheses, we used structural equation modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Time pressure negatively and positively related to work engagement through loss of time control and meaning in work. Further, only loss of time control mediated the time pressure-irritation relationship.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results demonstrate that time pressure likely acts motivating and demotivating at the same time, only through different paths. Hence, our study provides an explanation for the heterogeneous findings regarding the relationship between time pressure and work engagement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anxiety Stress and Coping\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"86-99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anxiety Stress and Coping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2023.2183389\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2023.2183389","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:时间压力通常被归类为一种挑战性压力源,它与员工的压力体验始终保持正相关。然而,关于时间压力与工作投入等激励结果之间的关系,研究人员报告了正面和负面的影响:借鉴挑战-阻碍框架,我们引入了两个解释机制(即时间控制的丧失和工作意义的增加),这两个机制可以解释与压力(此处操作为刺激)相关的一致研究结果,以及与工作投入相关的不同研究结果:我们进行了为期两周的两波调查。最终样本由 232 名参与者组成。为了验证我们的假设,我们使用了结构方程模型:结果:时间压力通过时间失控和工作意义与工作投入度呈负相关和正相关。此外,只有时间控制权的丧失在时间压力与恼怒的关系中起到了中介作用:研究结果表明,时间压力很可能同时起到激励和打击积极性的作用,只是通过不同的途径。因此,我们的研究为有关时间压力与工作投入之间关系的不同发现提供了解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Two sides of the same coin: motivating and demotivating mediation paths of time pressure and their relationship with strain.

Background: Time pressure, commonly categorized a challenge stressor, consistently and positively relates to employees' experience of strain. However, regarding its relationship with motivational outcomes such as work engagement researchers have reported positive as well as negative effects.

Objectives: Drawing on the challenge-hindrance framework, we introduce two explanatory mechanisms (i.e., a loss of time control and an increase of meaning in work) which may explain both, the consistent findings related to strain (here operationalized as irritation) as well as the diverse findings related to work engagement.

Methods: We conducted a two-wave survey with a two-week time-lag. The final sample consisted of 232 participants. To test our hypotheses, we used structural equation modeling.

Results: Time pressure negatively and positively related to work engagement through loss of time control and meaning in work. Further, only loss of time control mediated the time pressure-irritation relationship.

Conclusion: Results demonstrate that time pressure likely acts motivating and demotivating at the same time, only through different paths. Hence, our study provides an explanation for the heterogeneous findings regarding the relationship between time pressure and work engagement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: This journal provides a forum for scientific, theoretically important, and clinically significant research reports and conceptual contributions. It deals with experimental and field studies on anxiety dimensions and stress and coping processes, but also with related topics such as the antecedents and consequences of stress and emotion. We also encourage submissions contributing to the understanding of the relationship between psychological and physiological processes, specific for stress and anxiety. Manuscripts should report novel findings that are of interest to an international readership. While the journal is open to a diversity of articles.
期刊最新文献
Burnout, work-related daily negative affect and rumination: a mediation model combining an intensive and longitudinal design. Posttraumatic stress disorder in the aftermath of the Turkey earthquake: exploring the role of demographics, level of exposure, and personality traits. The relationship between momentary experiential avoidance and anxiety symptoms. Evidence that specific personal relationships help regulate depressive symptoms and related constructs among people with probable major depressive disorder. Reflection impulsivity in patients with panic disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1