COVID-19发作后的症状负担和康复偏好:一项患者调查

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Chronic Respiratory Disease Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/14799731231177316
Munyra Alhotye, Enya Daynes, Charlotte Gerlis, Sally J Singh
{"title":"COVID-19发作后的症状负担和康复偏好:一项患者调查","authors":"Munyra Alhotye,&nbsp;Enya Daynes,&nbsp;Charlotte Gerlis,&nbsp;Sally J Singh","doi":"10.1177/14799731231177316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After COVID-19 infection, individuals can experience a variety of symptoms that might require further treatment. Early data showed the value of adapted pulmonary rehabilitation programmes and technology-based interventions. To develop appropriate services, it is important to understand the symptom burden and the preferred mode of rehabilitation delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Post-hospital discharge (H) and post-community-managed (C) individuals received a follow-up call. A survey was completed to assess the most burdensome symptoms for which the patients would require support and their preference for the mode of rehabilitation delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 160 individuals who received a follow-up call completed the survey (51.2% male, mean [SD] age 54 [15] years) and 126 (78.8%) were post-hospital, while 34 (21.3%) had community-managed infections. A total of 101 (63.1%) reported that COVID-19-related symptoms were affecting their daily activities, and 106 (66.3%) reported their desire to be more active. The most common symptoms identified as needing support were fatigue and shortness of breath. Both groups expressed a preference for a face-to-face group programme (C: 54.8%; H: 46.8%), while (38.7%) of post-community-managed individuals and (40.3%) post-hospital patients preferred a supported digital rehabilitation programme. Few opted a non-digital home-based programme (C: 3.2%; H:12.9%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The survey responses indicated a significant symptom burden that may benefit from an intervention such as rehabilitation. Preferences for rehabilitation indicated that a face-to-face intervention was preferred by the majority, with a large proportion preferring digital intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"20 ","pages":"14799731231177316"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10191828/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Symptoms burden and rehabilitation preference after an episode of COVID-19: A patients survey.\",\"authors\":\"Munyra Alhotye,&nbsp;Enya Daynes,&nbsp;Charlotte Gerlis,&nbsp;Sally J Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14799731231177316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After COVID-19 infection, individuals can experience a variety of symptoms that might require further treatment. Early data showed the value of adapted pulmonary rehabilitation programmes and technology-based interventions. To develop appropriate services, it is important to understand the symptom burden and the preferred mode of rehabilitation delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Post-hospital discharge (H) and post-community-managed (C) individuals received a follow-up call. A survey was completed to assess the most burdensome symptoms for which the patients would require support and their preference for the mode of rehabilitation delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 160 individuals who received a follow-up call completed the survey (51.2% male, mean [SD] age 54 [15] years) and 126 (78.8%) were post-hospital, while 34 (21.3%) had community-managed infections. A total of 101 (63.1%) reported that COVID-19-related symptoms were affecting their daily activities, and 106 (66.3%) reported their desire to be more active. The most common symptoms identified as needing support were fatigue and shortness of breath. Both groups expressed a preference for a face-to-face group programme (C: 54.8%; H: 46.8%), while (38.7%) of post-community-managed individuals and (40.3%) post-hospital patients preferred a supported digital rehabilitation programme. Few opted a non-digital home-based programme (C: 3.2%; H:12.9%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The survey responses indicated a significant symptom burden that may benefit from an intervention such as rehabilitation. Preferences for rehabilitation indicated that a face-to-face intervention was preferred by the majority, with a large proportion preferring digital intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chronic Respiratory Disease\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"14799731231177316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10191828/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chronic Respiratory Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14799731231177316\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14799731231177316","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:感染COVID-19后,个体可能会出现各种症状,可能需要进一步治疗。早期数据显示适应性肺康复方案和基于技术的干预措施的价值。了解症状负担和首选的康复交付模式是制定适当的服务的重要因素。方法:对出院后(H)和社区管理后(C)个体进行随访。完成了一项调查,以评估患者需要支持的最繁重症状以及他们对康复交付方式的偏好。结果:总体而言,接受随访电话的160人完成了调查(51.2%为男性,平均[SD] 54[15]岁),126人(78.8%)为院后感染,34人(21.3%)为社区管理感染。共有101人(63.1%)表示,与新冠肺炎相关的症状影响了他们的日常活动,106人(66.3%)表示希望更加活跃。需要支持的最常见症状是疲劳和呼吸短促。两组学生都表示更喜欢面对面的小组课程(C: 54.8%;H: 46.8%),而(38.7%)社区管理后的个人和(40.3%)住院后的患者更喜欢支持的数字康复方案。少数人选择非数码家庭课程(C: 3.2%;H:分别为12.9%)。结论:调查结果表明,显著的症状负担可能受益于干预,如康复。对康复的偏好表明,大多数人更喜欢面对面的干预,很大一部分人更喜欢数字干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Symptoms burden and rehabilitation preference after an episode of COVID-19: A patients survey.

Background: After COVID-19 infection, individuals can experience a variety of symptoms that might require further treatment. Early data showed the value of adapted pulmonary rehabilitation programmes and technology-based interventions. To develop appropriate services, it is important to understand the symptom burden and the preferred mode of rehabilitation delivery.

Methods: Post-hospital discharge (H) and post-community-managed (C) individuals received a follow-up call. A survey was completed to assess the most burdensome symptoms for which the patients would require support and their preference for the mode of rehabilitation delivery.

Results: Overall, 160 individuals who received a follow-up call completed the survey (51.2% male, mean [SD] age 54 [15] years) and 126 (78.8%) were post-hospital, while 34 (21.3%) had community-managed infections. A total of 101 (63.1%) reported that COVID-19-related symptoms were affecting their daily activities, and 106 (66.3%) reported their desire to be more active. The most common symptoms identified as needing support were fatigue and shortness of breath. Both groups expressed a preference for a face-to-face group programme (C: 54.8%; H: 46.8%), while (38.7%) of post-community-managed individuals and (40.3%) post-hospital patients preferred a supported digital rehabilitation programme. Few opted a non-digital home-based programme (C: 3.2%; H:12.9%, respectively).

Conclusion: The survey responses indicated a significant symptom burden that may benefit from an intervention such as rehabilitation. Preferences for rehabilitation indicated that a face-to-face intervention was preferred by the majority, with a large proportion preferring digital intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chronic Respiratory Disease
Chronic Respiratory Disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Chronic Respiratory Disease is a peer-reviewed, open access, scholarly journal, created in response to the rising incidence of chronic respiratory diseases worldwide. It publishes high quality research papers and original articles that have immediate relevance to clinical practice and its multi-disciplinary perspective reflects the nature of modern treatment. The journal provides a high quality, multi-disciplinary focus for the publication of original papers, reviews and commentary in the broad area of chronic respiratory disease, particularly its treatment and management.
期刊最新文献
Eosinopenia in bronchiectasis: A novel biomarker for morbidity and mortality. Tracheal mucosal keratosis: Case discussion and literature review. Active cycle of breathing technique versus oscillating positive expiratory pressure therapy: Effect on lung function in children with primary ciliary dyskinesia; A feasibility study. Pulmonary rehabilitation healthcare professionals understanding and experiences of the protected characteristics of service users: A qualitative analysis. Is videoconference pulmonary rehabilitation associated with improvements in knowledge in people living with COPD? A propensity-matched service-evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1