探索南非茨瓦内骨盆骨折患者的协同护理。

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL South African Family Practice Pub Date : 2023-05-26 DOI:10.4102/safp.v65i1.5705
Ntombenkosi A Sobantu, Muziwakhe D Tshabalala, Verusia Chetty
{"title":"探索南非茨瓦内骨盆骨折患者的协同护理。","authors":"Ntombenkosi A Sobantu,&nbsp;Muziwakhe D Tshabalala,&nbsp;Verusia Chetty","doi":"10.4102/safp.v65i1.5705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pelvic fractures are complex injuries that lead to long-term disabilities and poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Even though pelvic fractures are known to be challenging to manage, there is limited information on guidelines and protocols to ensure that patients receive comprehensive and collaborative healthcare.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative descriptive phenomenological approach was utilised to explore current practices and innovations of healthcare professionals (HPs) in Tshwane academic hospitals in the collaborative management and rehabilitation of patients with pelvic fractures, using semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was used to analyse data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six overarching themes were identified from the interviews with HPs: The biopsychosocial lens of the patient, limitations in approaches to care, contextual impediments to care, the team challenge; the biopsychosocial aspects of care and forging forward to improve care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A multidisciplinary approach is encouraged for the comprehensive management of pelvic fractures. However, a poor understanding of roles and poor referral structures challenge this approach. Further barriers to caring include staff shortages and limited resources. Healthcare professionals recommended interprofessional education and collaborative practice, student training and using standardised outcome measurement tools to improve care for patients with pelvic fractures.Contribution: This study lays a foundation to initiate conversations about the development of an interprofessional model of care for patients with pelvic fractures. Findings might inform health policies on the management of pelvic fractures. Healthcare professionals might apply strategies that enhance the quality of healthcare provided. Patients with pelvic fractures might receive quality interprofessional healthcare that promotes quality of life, post pelvic fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":22040,"journal":{"name":"South African Family Practice","volume":"65 1","pages":"e1-e9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10244952/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the collaborative care of patients with pelvic fractures in Tshwane, South Africa.\",\"authors\":\"Ntombenkosi A Sobantu,&nbsp;Muziwakhe D Tshabalala,&nbsp;Verusia Chetty\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/safp.v65i1.5705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pelvic fractures are complex injuries that lead to long-term disabilities and poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Even though pelvic fractures are known to be challenging to manage, there is limited information on guidelines and protocols to ensure that patients receive comprehensive and collaborative healthcare.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative descriptive phenomenological approach was utilised to explore current practices and innovations of healthcare professionals (HPs) in Tshwane academic hospitals in the collaborative management and rehabilitation of patients with pelvic fractures, using semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was used to analyse data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six overarching themes were identified from the interviews with HPs: The biopsychosocial lens of the patient, limitations in approaches to care, contextual impediments to care, the team challenge; the biopsychosocial aspects of care and forging forward to improve care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A multidisciplinary approach is encouraged for the comprehensive management of pelvic fractures. However, a poor understanding of roles and poor referral structures challenge this approach. Further barriers to caring include staff shortages and limited resources. Healthcare professionals recommended interprofessional education and collaborative practice, student training and using standardised outcome measurement tools to improve care for patients with pelvic fractures.Contribution: This study lays a foundation to initiate conversations about the development of an interprofessional model of care for patients with pelvic fractures. Findings might inform health policies on the management of pelvic fractures. Healthcare professionals might apply strategies that enhance the quality of healthcare provided. Patients with pelvic fractures might receive quality interprofessional healthcare that promotes quality of life, post pelvic fractures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Family Practice\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"e1-e9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10244952/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Family Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v65i1.5705\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Family Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v65i1.5705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骨盆骨折是一种复杂的损伤,可导致长期残疾和健康相关生活质量差(HRQoL)。尽管骨盆骨折是众所周知的具有挑战性的管理,有有限的信息指导和方案,以确保患者得到全面和协作的医疗保健。方法:采用定性描述现象学方法,采用半结构化访谈,探讨茨瓦内学术医院医疗保健专业人员(HPs)在骨盆骨折患者的协作管理和康复方面的当前实践和创新。采用专题分析对数据进行分析。结果:从对HPs的访谈中确定了六个总体主题:患者的生物心理社会视角,护理方法的局限性,护理的环境障碍,团队挑战;生物心理社会方面的护理和锻造,以改善护理。结论:骨盆骨折的综合治疗应采用多学科方法。然而,对角色的不理解和不完善的转诊结构对这种方法构成了挑战。护理的其他障碍包括工作人员短缺和资源有限。医疗保健专业人员推荐跨专业教育和合作实践,学生培训和使用标准化的结果测量工具来改善对骨盆骨折患者的护理。贡献:本研究为建立骨盆骨折患者的跨专业护理模式奠定了基础。研究结果可能为骨盆骨折管理的卫生政策提供信息。医疗保健专业人员可以采用提高所提供医疗保健质量的策略。骨盆骨折患者可能会接受高质量的跨专业医疗保健,以提高骨盆骨折后的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the collaborative care of patients with pelvic fractures in Tshwane, South Africa.

Background: Pelvic fractures are complex injuries that lead to long-term disabilities and poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Even though pelvic fractures are known to be challenging to manage, there is limited information on guidelines and protocols to ensure that patients receive comprehensive and collaborative healthcare.

Methods: A qualitative descriptive phenomenological approach was utilised to explore current practices and innovations of healthcare professionals (HPs) in Tshwane academic hospitals in the collaborative management and rehabilitation of patients with pelvic fractures, using semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was used to analyse data.

Results: Six overarching themes were identified from the interviews with HPs: The biopsychosocial lens of the patient, limitations in approaches to care, contextual impediments to care, the team challenge; the biopsychosocial aspects of care and forging forward to improve care.

Conclusion: A multidisciplinary approach is encouraged for the comprehensive management of pelvic fractures. However, a poor understanding of roles and poor referral structures challenge this approach. Further barriers to caring include staff shortages and limited resources. Healthcare professionals recommended interprofessional education and collaborative practice, student training and using standardised outcome measurement tools to improve care for patients with pelvic fractures.Contribution: This study lays a foundation to initiate conversations about the development of an interprofessional model of care for patients with pelvic fractures. Findings might inform health policies on the management of pelvic fractures. Healthcare professionals might apply strategies that enhance the quality of healthcare provided. Patients with pelvic fractures might receive quality interprofessional healthcare that promotes quality of life, post pelvic fractures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
South African Family Practice
South African Family Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: South African Family Practice (SAFP) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, which strives to provide primary care physicians and researchers with a broad range of scholarly work in the disciplines of Family Medicine, Primary Health Care, Rural Medicine, District Health and other related fields. SAFP publishes original research, clinical reviews, and pertinent commentary that advance the knowledge base of these disciplines. The content of SAFP is designed to reflect and support further development of the broad basis of these disciplines through original research and critical review of evidence in important clinical areas; as well as to provide practitioners with continuing professional development material.
期刊最新文献
Hypertension guideline implementation and blood pressure control in Matlosana, South Africa. The lifestyle factors of medical doctors in academic hospitals, Bloemfontein, Free State. Tobacco use and readiness to treat tobacco users among primary healthcare professionals in Soweto. A review of burnout among doctors in South Africa: Pre-, during and post-COVID-19 pandemic. Medication adherence in geriatric patients attending medical outpatient department.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1