术后恢复概况的心理测量评估。

IF 2.2 Q1 NURSING Nursing Research and Practice Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/3745570
Jenny Jakobsson
{"title":"术后恢复概况的心理测量评估。","authors":"Jenny Jakobsson","doi":"10.1155/2023/3745570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To further evaluate the postoperative recovery profile regarding its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The postoperative recovery profile is an instrument for the self-assessment of general postoperative recovery that has received increased attention within nursing research. However, psychometric evaluation during development was sparse.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Psychometric evaluation was done using classical test theory.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data quality, targeting, reliability, and scaling assumptions were measured. In addition, confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate construct validity. Data collection was made during 2011-2013.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Data derived from this study showed acceptable quality; however, item distribution was skewed, with ceiling effects in the majority of items. Cronbach's alpha showed high internal consistency. Item-total correlations indicated unidimensionality, whereas six items demonstrated high correlations pointing at redundancy. The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed problems related to dimensionality as the five proposed dimensions were highly correlated with each other. Furthermore, items were largely uncorrelated with the designated dimensions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that the postoperative recovery profile needs to be further developed to serve as a robust instrument within nursing as well as medical research. Arguably, values from the instrument should not be calculated at a dimensional level for the time being because of discriminant validity issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":46917,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Research and Practice","volume":"2023 ","pages":"3745570"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10241590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Evaluation of the Postoperative Recovery Profile.\",\"authors\":\"Jenny Jakobsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/3745570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To further evaluate the postoperative recovery profile regarding its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The postoperative recovery profile is an instrument for the self-assessment of general postoperative recovery that has received increased attention within nursing research. However, psychometric evaluation during development was sparse.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Psychometric evaluation was done using classical test theory.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data quality, targeting, reliability, and scaling assumptions were measured. In addition, confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate construct validity. Data collection was made during 2011-2013.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Data derived from this study showed acceptable quality; however, item distribution was skewed, with ceiling effects in the majority of items. Cronbach's alpha showed high internal consistency. Item-total correlations indicated unidimensionality, whereas six items demonstrated high correlations pointing at redundancy. The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed problems related to dimensionality as the five proposed dimensions were highly correlated with each other. Furthermore, items were largely uncorrelated with the designated dimensions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that the postoperative recovery profile needs to be further developed to serve as a robust instrument within nursing as well as medical research. Arguably, values from the instrument should not be calculated at a dimensional level for the time being because of discriminant validity issues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"2023 \",\"pages\":\"3745570\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10241590/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/3745570\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/3745570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:进一步评价其心理测量特性的术后恢复概况。背景:术后恢复概况是一种对一般术后恢复进行自我评估的工具,在护理研究中受到越来越多的关注。然而,在发展过程中,心理测量的评估是稀疏的。设计:采用经典测试理论进行心理测量评价。方法:测量数据质量、目标、可靠性和尺度假设。此外,采用验证性因子分析评估构念效度。数据收集时间为2011-2013年。结果:本研究数据质量可接受;然而,物品分布是倾斜的,大多数物品都有天花板效应。Cronbach的alpha值表现出高度的内部一致性。项目总数相关性表明单维性,而六个项目显示高相关性,指向冗余。验证性因子分析证实了与维度相关的问题,因为五个提出的维度彼此高度相关。此外,项目在很大程度上与指定维度无关。结论:本研究表明,术后恢复概况需要进一步发展,以作为护理和医学研究的有力工具。可以说,由于判别效度问题,目前不应在维度水平上计算该工具的值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychometric Evaluation of the Postoperative Recovery Profile.

Aim: To further evaluate the postoperative recovery profile regarding its psychometric properties.

Background: The postoperative recovery profile is an instrument for the self-assessment of general postoperative recovery that has received increased attention within nursing research. However, psychometric evaluation during development was sparse.

Design: Psychometric evaluation was done using classical test theory.

Method: Data quality, targeting, reliability, and scaling assumptions were measured. In addition, confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate construct validity. Data collection was made during 2011-2013.

Result: Data derived from this study showed acceptable quality; however, item distribution was skewed, with ceiling effects in the majority of items. Cronbach's alpha showed high internal consistency. Item-total correlations indicated unidimensionality, whereas six items demonstrated high correlations pointing at redundancy. The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed problems related to dimensionality as the five proposed dimensions were highly correlated with each other. Furthermore, items were largely uncorrelated with the designated dimensions.

Conclusion: This study shows that the postoperative recovery profile needs to be further developed to serve as a robust instrument within nursing as well as medical research. Arguably, values from the instrument should not be calculated at a dimensional level for the time being because of discriminant validity issues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Nursing Faculty Shortage Impact on Nursing Students: A Descriptive Phenomenological Study. Nurses' Perception on the Hindrances of Triage System in Emergency Unit. Development of a Symptom Self-Management Guide for Older Chinese Americans Kidney Receiving Replacement Therapy. NoFumo+: Mobile Health App to Quit Smoking Using Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy. Measuring Cardiovascular Disease Risk Perception: Translation and Validation of the Indonesian ABCD Risk Questionnaire.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1