语义和语音工作记忆对叙述性语言的贡献与单词生成无关:来自急性中风的证据

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Cognitive Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-16 DOI:10.1080/02643294.2023.2186782
Rachel Zahn, Tatiana T Schnur, Randi C Martin
{"title":"语义和语音工作记忆对叙述性语言的贡献与单词生成无关:来自急性中风的证据","authors":"Rachel Zahn, Tatiana T Schnur, Randi C Martin","doi":"10.1080/02643294.2023.2186782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>ABSTRACT</b>Neuropsychological case studies have provided evidence that individuals with semantic, but not phonological, working memory (WM) deficits have difficulty producing phrases containing several content words. These findings supported the claim of a phrasal scope of planning at the grammatical formulation stage of production, where semantic WM supports the maintenance of lexical-semantic representations as they are inserted into slots in phrasal constituents. Recent narrative production results for individuals at the acute stage of stroke supported the role for semantic WM in phrasal elaboration while suggesting a role for phonological WM at a subsequent phonological encoding stage in supporting fluent, rapid speech. In the present study, we employed a larger participant sample while controlling for single word production abilities at semantic and phonological levels. Results confirmed the relations between semantic WM and phrasal elaboration whereas the relation between phonological WM and speech rate was eliminated. There was, however, evidence that both impaired phonological retrieval and restricted phonological WM were related to the tendency to produce short, highly frequent words such as pronouns rather than longer, less frequent words. Future research is needed to address whether the results relating to phonological WM depend on damage specific to an output rather than an input phonological capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50670,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neuropsychology","volume":"39 5-8","pages":"296-324"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10712216/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contributions of semantic and phonological working memory to narrative language independent of single word production: Evidence from acute stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Zahn, Tatiana T Schnur, Randi C Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02643294.2023.2186782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>ABSTRACT</b>Neuropsychological case studies have provided evidence that individuals with semantic, but not phonological, working memory (WM) deficits have difficulty producing phrases containing several content words. These findings supported the claim of a phrasal scope of planning at the grammatical formulation stage of production, where semantic WM supports the maintenance of lexical-semantic representations as they are inserted into slots in phrasal constituents. Recent narrative production results for individuals at the acute stage of stroke supported the role for semantic WM in phrasal elaboration while suggesting a role for phonological WM at a subsequent phonological encoding stage in supporting fluent, rapid speech. In the present study, we employed a larger participant sample while controlling for single word production abilities at semantic and phonological levels. Results confirmed the relations between semantic WM and phrasal elaboration whereas the relation between phonological WM and speech rate was eliminated. There was, however, evidence that both impaired phonological retrieval and restricted phonological WM were related to the tendency to produce short, highly frequent words such as pronouns rather than longer, less frequent words. Future research is needed to address whether the results relating to phonological WM depend on damage specific to an output rather than an input phonological capacity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Neuropsychology\",\"volume\":\"39 5-8\",\"pages\":\"296-324\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10712216/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2023.2186782\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2023.2186782","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要神经心理学案例研究提供了证据,表明有语义工作记忆(WM)缺陷而非语音工作记忆(WM)缺陷的个体在生成包含多个内容词的短语时会遇到困难。这些研究结果支持了在语法构词阶段进行短语范围规划的说法,在这一阶段,语义工作记忆支持词汇-语义表征的维持,因为这些表征被插入到短语成分的插槽中。最近针对中风急性期患者的叙事生产结果支持语义 WM 在短语阐述中的作用,同时也表明语音 WM 在随后的语音编码阶段支持流利、快速的语音。在本研究中,我们采用了更大的参与者样本,同时控制了语义和语音层面的单词生成能力。结果证实了语义 WM 与短语阐述之间的关系,而语音 WM 与语速之间的关系则被排除了。然而,有证据表明,语音检索受损和语音 WM 受限与倾向于产生短小、高频词(如代词)而不是较长、较少出现的词有关。未来的研究需要解决与语音 WM 有关的结果是否取决于输出而非输入语音能力的特定损害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contributions of semantic and phonological working memory to narrative language independent of single word production: Evidence from acute stroke.

ABSTRACTNeuropsychological case studies have provided evidence that individuals with semantic, but not phonological, working memory (WM) deficits have difficulty producing phrases containing several content words. These findings supported the claim of a phrasal scope of planning at the grammatical formulation stage of production, where semantic WM supports the maintenance of lexical-semantic representations as they are inserted into slots in phrasal constituents. Recent narrative production results for individuals at the acute stage of stroke supported the role for semantic WM in phrasal elaboration while suggesting a role for phonological WM at a subsequent phonological encoding stage in supporting fluent, rapid speech. In the present study, we employed a larger participant sample while controlling for single word production abilities at semantic and phonological levels. Results confirmed the relations between semantic WM and phrasal elaboration whereas the relation between phonological WM and speech rate was eliminated. There was, however, evidence that both impaired phonological retrieval and restricted phonological WM were related to the tendency to produce short, highly frequent words such as pronouns rather than longer, less frequent words. Future research is needed to address whether the results relating to phonological WM depend on damage specific to an output rather than an input phonological capacity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Neuropsychology
Cognitive Neuropsychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neuropsychology is of interest to cognitive scientists and neuroscientists, neuropsychologists, neurologists, psycholinguists, speech pathologists, physiotherapists, and psychiatrists.
期刊最新文献
The localization of coma. Does the procedural deficit hypothesis of dyslexia account for the lack of automatization and the comorbidity among developmental disorders? Developmental surface dyslexia and dysgraphia in a child with corpus callosum agenesis: an approach to diagnosis and treatment. The heterogeneity of holistic processing profiles in developmental prosopagnosia: holistic processing is impaired but not absent. The relationship between semantics, phonology, and naming performance in aphasia: a structural equation modeling approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1