第三代测序技术与传统微生物检测在下呼吸道感染病原体诊断中的比较。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Discovery medicine Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.24976/Discov.Med.202335176.34
Wang Luo, Yanbin He, Jianhui Xu, Shuhua Zhang, Chunxi Li, Jiangfeng Lv, Youfeng Shen, Zhao Ou, Hangming Dong
{"title":"第三代测序技术与传统微生物检测在下呼吸道感染病原体诊断中的比较。","authors":"Wang Luo,&nbsp;Yanbin He,&nbsp;Jianhui Xu,&nbsp;Shuhua Zhang,&nbsp;Chunxi Li,&nbsp;Jiangfeng Lv,&nbsp;Youfeng Shen,&nbsp;Zhao Ou,&nbsp;Hangming Dong","doi":"10.24976/Discov.Med.202335176.34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is common to obtain a low detection rate and unsatisfactory detection results in complex infection or rare pathogen detection. This retrospective study aimed to illustrate the application value and prospect of the third-generation sequencing technology in lower respiratory tract infection disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study recruited 70 patients with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). Pathogen detection of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) from all patients was performed using nanopore metagenomic sequencing technology and traditional culture. BALF culture combined with quantitiative PCR (qPCR) was used as a reference standard to analyze the sensitivity and specificity of nanopore sequencing technology. The current study also collected the examination results of enrolled samples using technical methods sputum culture, tuberculosis DNA (TB-DNA), and Xpert MTB/RIF and analyzed the detection efficiency of nanopore sequencing for <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The positive rates of pathogens in 70 BALF samples detected by conventional culture and nanopore sequencing were 25.71% and 84.29%, respectively. Among the 59 positive BALF cases using nanopore sequencing, a total of 31 pathogens were identified, of which the proportions of bacteria, fungi, viruses, and other pathogens were 50%, 17%, 32%, and 1%, respectively. Using the results combined with culture and qPCR detection methods as the standard, the pathogen detection of BALF using nanopore sequencing had a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 91.7%. Additionally, the positive rate of the detection of <i>M. tuberculosis</i> using nanopore sequencing was 33.3% (6/18). The clinical medication plans of 74.3% (52/70) of the patients were referred to the nanopore sequencing results, of which 31 cases changed their treatment strategy, 21 supported the previous treatment plans, and 90% (47/52) of the patients finally had clinical improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BALF detection using nanopore sequencing technology improves the process of detecting pathogens in patients with LRTI, especially for <i>M. tuberculosis</i>, fungi, and viruses, by reducing the report time from three days to six hours. The clinical application prospect of nanopore sequencing technology is promising in the pathogen diagnosis of LRTI.</p>","PeriodicalId":11379,"journal":{"name":"Discovery medicine","volume":"35 176","pages":"332-342"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Third-Generation Sequencing Technology and Traditional Microbiological Detection in Pathogen Diagnosis of Lower Respiratory Tract Infection.\",\"authors\":\"Wang Luo,&nbsp;Yanbin He,&nbsp;Jianhui Xu,&nbsp;Shuhua Zhang,&nbsp;Chunxi Li,&nbsp;Jiangfeng Lv,&nbsp;Youfeng Shen,&nbsp;Zhao Ou,&nbsp;Hangming Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.24976/Discov.Med.202335176.34\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is common to obtain a low detection rate and unsatisfactory detection results in complex infection or rare pathogen detection. This retrospective study aimed to illustrate the application value and prospect of the third-generation sequencing technology in lower respiratory tract infection disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study recruited 70 patients with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). Pathogen detection of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) from all patients was performed using nanopore metagenomic sequencing technology and traditional culture. BALF culture combined with quantitiative PCR (qPCR) was used as a reference standard to analyze the sensitivity and specificity of nanopore sequencing technology. The current study also collected the examination results of enrolled samples using technical methods sputum culture, tuberculosis DNA (TB-DNA), and Xpert MTB/RIF and analyzed the detection efficiency of nanopore sequencing for <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The positive rates of pathogens in 70 BALF samples detected by conventional culture and nanopore sequencing were 25.71% and 84.29%, respectively. Among the 59 positive BALF cases using nanopore sequencing, a total of 31 pathogens were identified, of which the proportions of bacteria, fungi, viruses, and other pathogens were 50%, 17%, 32%, and 1%, respectively. Using the results combined with culture and qPCR detection methods as the standard, the pathogen detection of BALF using nanopore sequencing had a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 91.7%. Additionally, the positive rate of the detection of <i>M. tuberculosis</i> using nanopore sequencing was 33.3% (6/18). The clinical medication plans of 74.3% (52/70) of the patients were referred to the nanopore sequencing results, of which 31 cases changed their treatment strategy, 21 supported the previous treatment plans, and 90% (47/52) of the patients finally had clinical improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BALF detection using nanopore sequencing technology improves the process of detecting pathogens in patients with LRTI, especially for <i>M. tuberculosis</i>, fungi, and viruses, by reducing the report time from three days to six hours. The clinical application prospect of nanopore sequencing technology is promising in the pathogen diagnosis of LRTI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Discovery medicine\",\"volume\":\"35 176\",\"pages\":\"332-342\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Discovery medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24976/Discov.Med.202335176.34\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discovery medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24976/Discov.Med.202335176.34","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:在复杂感染或罕见病原体的检测中,常见的是检出率低、结果不理想。本研究旨在说明第三代测序技术在下呼吸道感染疾病中的应用价值和前景。方法:本研究招募70例下呼吸道感染(LRTI)患者。采用纳米孔宏基因组测序技术和传统培养对所有患者的支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)进行病原体检测。以BALF培养结合定量PCR (qPCR)作为参比标准,分析纳米孔测序技术的灵敏度和特异性。本研究还采用痰培养、结核DNA (TB-DNA)和Xpert MTB/RIF技术方法收集了入组样本的检测结果,并分析了纳米孔测序对结核分枝杆菌的检测效率。结果:70份BALF标本经常规培养和纳米孔测序检测,病原菌阳性率分别为25.71%和84.29%。在59例BALF阳性病例中,纳米孔测序共鉴定出31种病原体,其中细菌、真菌、病毒和其他病原体的比例分别为50%、17%、32%和1%。结合培养和qPCR检测方法,纳米孔测序检测BALF的灵敏度为70%,特异性为91.7%。纳米孔测序对结核分枝杆菌的检出率为33.3%(6/18)。74.3%(52/70)患者的临床用药方案参考了纳米孔测序结果,其中31例改变治疗策略,21例支持原有治疗方案,90%(47/52)患者最终临床改善。结论:利用纳米孔测序技术检测BALF可将报告时间从3天减少到6小时,从而改善了LRTI患者病原体的检测过程,特别是对结核分枝杆菌、真菌和病毒的检测。纳米孔测序技术在LRTI病原体诊断中的临床应用前景广阔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Third-Generation Sequencing Technology and Traditional Microbiological Detection in Pathogen Diagnosis of Lower Respiratory Tract Infection.

Background: It is common to obtain a low detection rate and unsatisfactory detection results in complex infection or rare pathogen detection. This retrospective study aimed to illustrate the application value and prospect of the third-generation sequencing technology in lower respiratory tract infection disease.

Methods: This study recruited 70 patients with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). Pathogen detection of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) from all patients was performed using nanopore metagenomic sequencing technology and traditional culture. BALF culture combined with quantitiative PCR (qPCR) was used as a reference standard to analyze the sensitivity and specificity of nanopore sequencing technology. The current study also collected the examination results of enrolled samples using technical methods sputum culture, tuberculosis DNA (TB-DNA), and Xpert MTB/RIF and analyzed the detection efficiency of nanopore sequencing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Results: The positive rates of pathogens in 70 BALF samples detected by conventional culture and nanopore sequencing were 25.71% and 84.29%, respectively. Among the 59 positive BALF cases using nanopore sequencing, a total of 31 pathogens were identified, of which the proportions of bacteria, fungi, viruses, and other pathogens were 50%, 17%, 32%, and 1%, respectively. Using the results combined with culture and qPCR detection methods as the standard, the pathogen detection of BALF using nanopore sequencing had a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 91.7%. Additionally, the positive rate of the detection of M. tuberculosis using nanopore sequencing was 33.3% (6/18). The clinical medication plans of 74.3% (52/70) of the patients were referred to the nanopore sequencing results, of which 31 cases changed their treatment strategy, 21 supported the previous treatment plans, and 90% (47/52) of the patients finally had clinical improvement.

Conclusions: BALF detection using nanopore sequencing technology improves the process of detecting pathogens in patients with LRTI, especially for M. tuberculosis, fungi, and viruses, by reducing the report time from three days to six hours. The clinical application prospect of nanopore sequencing technology is promising in the pathogen diagnosis of LRTI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Discovery medicine
Discovery medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Discovery Medicine publishes novel, provocative ideas and research findings that challenge conventional notions about disease mechanisms, diagnosis, treatment, or any of the life sciences subjects. It publishes cutting-edge, reliable, and authoritative information in all branches of life sciences but primarily in the following areas: Novel therapies and diagnostics (approved or experimental); innovative ideas, research technologies, and translational research that will give rise to the next generation of new drugs and therapies; breakthrough understanding of mechanism of disease, biology, and physiology; and commercialization of biomedical discoveries pertaining to the development of new drugs, therapies, medical devices, and research technology.
期刊最新文献
The Action Mechanisms, Anti-Cancer and Antibiotic-Modulation Potential of Vaccinium myrtillus L. Extract. Development and Comparative Analysis of an Early Prediction Model for Acute Kidney Injury within 72-Hours Post-ICU Admission Using Evidence from the MIMIC-III Database. H2S Alleviates Propofol-Induced Impaired Learning and Memory by Promoting Nuclear Translocation of Nrf2 and Inhibiting Apoptosis and Pyroptosis in Hippocampal Neurons. Animal Feasibility Study of a Novel Spinal Cord Stimulation Multicolumn Lead (Heron Lead). The Clinical Significance of iNOS/NO Signaling Pathway in Traumatic Shock and the Mechanism under the Promotion on the Development of Traumatic Shock via Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1