新冠肺炎疫苗犹豫:认知决定因素的系统回顾。

IF 2.4 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Promotion Perspectives Pub Date : 2023-04-30 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.34172/hpp.2023.03
Sara Pourrazavi, Zahra Fathifar, Manoj Sharma, Hamid Allahverdipour
{"title":"新冠肺炎疫苗犹豫:认知决定因素的系统回顾。","authors":"Sara Pourrazavi,&nbsp;Zahra Fathifar,&nbsp;Manoj Sharma,&nbsp;Hamid Allahverdipour","doi":"10.34172/hpp.2023.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Although mass vaccination is considered one of the most effective public health strategies during the pandemic, in the COVID-19 era, many people considered vaccines unnecessary and, or doubted the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine. This review aimed to tabulate cognitive causes of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy, which may help public health policymakers overcome the barriers to mass vaccinations in future pandemics. <b>Methods:</b> For this systematic review, studies pertaining to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy published up to June 2022 were retrieved from six online databases (Cochrane Library, Google Scholar Medline through PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science). Inclusion criteria were the studies conducted on people who had a delay in accepting or refusing COVID-19 vaccines, reported the impact of cognitive determinants on vaccine hesitancy, and were written in English in the timeframe of 2020-2022. <b>Results:</b> This systematic review initially reviewed 1171 records. From these 91 articles met the inclusion criteria. The vaccination hesitation rate was 29.72% on average. This systematic review identified several cognitive determinants influencing vaccination hesitancy. Lack of confidence and complacency were the most frequent factors that predicted vaccine hesitancy. <b>Conclusion:</b> The identified prevailing cognitive determinants for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy indicated that using initiative and effective communication strategies would be a determinant factor in building people's trust in vaccines during the pandemic and mass vaccinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":46588,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Perspectives","volume":"13 1","pages":"21-35"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257562/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A Systematic review of cognitive determinants.\",\"authors\":\"Sara Pourrazavi,&nbsp;Zahra Fathifar,&nbsp;Manoj Sharma,&nbsp;Hamid Allahverdipour\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/hpp.2023.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Although mass vaccination is considered one of the most effective public health strategies during the pandemic, in the COVID-19 era, many people considered vaccines unnecessary and, or doubted the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine. This review aimed to tabulate cognitive causes of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy, which may help public health policymakers overcome the barriers to mass vaccinations in future pandemics. <b>Methods:</b> For this systematic review, studies pertaining to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy published up to June 2022 were retrieved from six online databases (Cochrane Library, Google Scholar Medline through PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science). Inclusion criteria were the studies conducted on people who had a delay in accepting or refusing COVID-19 vaccines, reported the impact of cognitive determinants on vaccine hesitancy, and were written in English in the timeframe of 2020-2022. <b>Results:</b> This systematic review initially reviewed 1171 records. From these 91 articles met the inclusion criteria. The vaccination hesitation rate was 29.72% on average. This systematic review identified several cognitive determinants influencing vaccination hesitancy. Lack of confidence and complacency were the most frequent factors that predicted vaccine hesitancy. <b>Conclusion:</b> The identified prevailing cognitive determinants for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy indicated that using initiative and effective communication strategies would be a determinant factor in building people's trust in vaccines during the pandemic and mass vaccinations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"21-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257562/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.2023.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.2023.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管大规模疫苗接种被认为是大流行期间最有效的公共卫生策略之一,但在新冠肺炎时代,许多人认为疫苗是不必要的,并怀疑新冠肺炎疫苗的有效性。这项审查旨在将新冠肺炎疫苗接种犹豫的认知原因制成表格,这可能有助于公共卫生政策制定者克服在未来大流行中大规模接种疫苗的障碍。方法:在本系统综述中,从六个在线数据库(Cochrane Library、Google Scholar Medline through PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science)检索截至2022年6月发表的与新冠肺炎疫苗犹豫有关的研究。纳入标准是对延迟接受或拒绝新冠肺炎疫苗的人进行的研究,报告了认知决定因素对疫苗犹豫的影响,并在2020-2022年期间用英语写成。结果:本系统回顾最初回顾了1171份记录。这91篇文章符合入选标准。接种犹豫率平均为29.72%。这项系统综述确定了影响疫苗接种犹豫的几个认知决定因素。缺乏信心和自满情绪是预测疫苗犹豫的最常见因素。结论:已确定的新冠肺炎疫苗犹豫的主要认知决定因素表明,在大流行和大规模疫苗接种期间,使用主动和有效的沟通策略将是建立人们对疫苗信任的决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A Systematic review of cognitive determinants.

Background: Although mass vaccination is considered one of the most effective public health strategies during the pandemic, in the COVID-19 era, many people considered vaccines unnecessary and, or doubted the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccine. This review aimed to tabulate cognitive causes of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy, which may help public health policymakers overcome the barriers to mass vaccinations in future pandemics. Methods: For this systematic review, studies pertaining to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy published up to June 2022 were retrieved from six online databases (Cochrane Library, Google Scholar Medline through PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science). Inclusion criteria were the studies conducted on people who had a delay in accepting or refusing COVID-19 vaccines, reported the impact of cognitive determinants on vaccine hesitancy, and were written in English in the timeframe of 2020-2022. Results: This systematic review initially reviewed 1171 records. From these 91 articles met the inclusion criteria. The vaccination hesitation rate was 29.72% on average. This systematic review identified several cognitive determinants influencing vaccination hesitancy. Lack of confidence and complacency were the most frequent factors that predicted vaccine hesitancy. Conclusion: The identified prevailing cognitive determinants for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy indicated that using initiative and effective communication strategies would be a determinant factor in building people's trust in vaccines during the pandemic and mass vaccinations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Perspectives
Health Promotion Perspectives PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
A systematic review of the impact of therapeutic education programs on the quality of life of people with Multiple Sclerosis. Childhood maltreatment and vulnerability to substance use disorders: The mediating role of psychological security. Corrigendum to: Examining associations between smartphone use, smartphone addiction, and mental health outcomes: a cross-sectional study of college students Kil N, Kim J, McDaniel JT, Kim J, Kensinger K. Health Promot Perspect. 2021;11(1):36-44. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2021.06. Corrigendum to: Prevalence and incidence of type 1 diabetes in the world: a systematic review and meta-analysis Mobasseri M, Shirmohammadi M, Amiri T, Vahed N, Hosseini Fard H, Ghojazadeh M. Health Promot Perspect. 2020 Mar 30;10(2):98-115. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2020.18. Development of a new equation and validation of earlier resting energy expenditure predicting equations in adults living in Tehran.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1