一种测量病人门诊医疗体验的工具的心理计量学验证。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Zdravstveno Varstvo Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.2478/sjph-2023-0021
Gregor Sočan, Dolf De Boer, Eva Murko, Marcel Kralj, Nina Ropret, Metka Zaletel
{"title":"一种测量病人门诊医疗体验的工具的心理计量学验证。","authors":"Gregor Sočan,&nbsp;Dolf De Boer,&nbsp;Eva Murko,&nbsp;Marcel Kralj,&nbsp;Nina Ropret,&nbsp;Metka Zaletel","doi":"10.2478/sjph-2023-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Recently, a patient-reported experience measure (PREM) was developed in Slovenia to assess patients' experiences with outpatient specialist healthcare clinics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties (including factor structure, reliability, convergent validity, and response distribution) of the questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample consisted of 8,406 adult participants treated in 171 specialist clinics from different medical fields. Participants voluntarily and anonymously responded to either the paper or online survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Descriptive statistics show meaningful response patterns with a general tendency towards favourable assessments. The psychometric analyses of the scales evaluating doctor's and nurses' work, respectively, generally showed a good fit of the unidimensional factor model as well as the Rasch model, high factor loadings and very good to satisfactory reliability. The Rasch scaling showed that these scales were most informative for patients with relatively unfavourable experience ratings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results are similar to those found in previous evaluations of PREMs in other countries. Given its good psychometric properties, the Slovenian PREM can be recommended for healthcare evaluations in Slovenia and as a model for the development of similar PREMs in other countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":45127,"journal":{"name":"Zdravstveno Varstvo","volume":"62 3","pages":"153-161"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d7/e7/sjph-62-3-sjph-2023-0021.PMC10263366.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Patient Experiences with Outpatient Healthcare.\",\"authors\":\"Gregor Sočan,&nbsp;Dolf De Boer,&nbsp;Eva Murko,&nbsp;Marcel Kralj,&nbsp;Nina Ropret,&nbsp;Metka Zaletel\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/sjph-2023-0021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Recently, a patient-reported experience measure (PREM) was developed in Slovenia to assess patients' experiences with outpatient specialist healthcare clinics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties (including factor structure, reliability, convergent validity, and response distribution) of the questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample consisted of 8,406 adult participants treated in 171 specialist clinics from different medical fields. Participants voluntarily and anonymously responded to either the paper or online survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Descriptive statistics show meaningful response patterns with a general tendency towards favourable assessments. The psychometric analyses of the scales evaluating doctor's and nurses' work, respectively, generally showed a good fit of the unidimensional factor model as well as the Rasch model, high factor loadings and very good to satisfactory reliability. The Rasch scaling showed that these scales were most informative for patients with relatively unfavourable experience ratings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results are similar to those found in previous evaluations of PREMs in other countries. Given its good psychometric properties, the Slovenian PREM can be recommended for healthcare evaluations in Slovenia and as a model for the development of similar PREMs in other countries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zdravstveno Varstvo\",\"volume\":\"62 3\",\"pages\":\"153-161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d7/e7/sjph-62-3-sjph-2023-0021.PMC10263366.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zdravstveno Varstvo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2023-0021\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zdravstveno Varstvo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2023-0021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:最近,在斯洛文尼亚开发了一种患者报告的经验措施(PREM),以评估患者在门诊专科医疗保健诊所的经验。本研究的目的是评估问卷的心理测量性质(包括因子结构、信度、收敛效度和反应分布)。方法:样本包括来自不同医学领域的171个专科诊所的8406名成人。参与者自愿匿名地回答了纸质或在线调查。结果:描述性统计显示有意义的反应模式,总体倾向于有利的评估。分别对医生和护士工作评价量表进行心理测量分析,总体上显示一维因子模型和Rasch模型拟合良好,因子负荷较高,信度较好至满意。拉什量表显示,这些量表对经验评分相对较差的患者最有帮助。结论:研究结果与其他国家对PREMs的评价结果基本一致。鉴于其良好的心理测量特性,斯洛文尼亚PREM可被推荐用于斯洛文尼亚的医疗保健评估,并可作为其他国家开发类似PREM的样板。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychometric Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Patient Experiences with Outpatient Healthcare.

Aim: Recently, a patient-reported experience measure (PREM) was developed in Slovenia to assess patients' experiences with outpatient specialist healthcare clinics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties (including factor structure, reliability, convergent validity, and response distribution) of the questionnaire.

Methods: The sample consisted of 8,406 adult participants treated in 171 specialist clinics from different medical fields. Participants voluntarily and anonymously responded to either the paper or online survey.

Results: Descriptive statistics show meaningful response patterns with a general tendency towards favourable assessments. The psychometric analyses of the scales evaluating doctor's and nurses' work, respectively, generally showed a good fit of the unidimensional factor model as well as the Rasch model, high factor loadings and very good to satisfactory reliability. The Rasch scaling showed that these scales were most informative for patients with relatively unfavourable experience ratings.

Conclusions: The results are similar to those found in previous evaluations of PREMs in other countries. Given its good psychometric properties, the Slovenian PREM can be recommended for healthcare evaluations in Slovenia and as a model for the development of similar PREMs in other countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zdravstveno Varstvo
Zdravstveno Varstvo PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Monitoring the Effect of Vaccination on Mumps Cases Complications in the Czech Republic - Surveillance Data 2013-2022. Smokers' Characteristics Associated with Successful Smoking Cessation Undergoing Pharmacotherapy in Slovenia. Stigmatising Attitudes Towards Mental Health Conditions Among Medical Students In Five South-Eastern European Countries. The Evolution and Challenges of Academic Family Medicine: Insights from the Banja Luka Declaration. The Results of the "My Challenge" Camp in Addressing Childhood Obesity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1