日本脑瘫儿童心理测量评价及分类系统分布。

IF 0.8 Q4 PEDIATRICS Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3233/PRM-210098
Hisato Nishibu, Tsugumi Hosokawa Seino, Nobuaki Himuro
{"title":"日本脑瘫儿童心理测量评价及分类系统分布。","authors":"Hisato Nishibu,&nbsp;Tsugumi Hosokawa Seino,&nbsp;Nobuaki Himuro","doi":"10.3233/PRM-210098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study sought to examine the content validity, the intra- and inter-rater reliability, and concurrent validity of the Japanese versions of the Manual Ability Classification System, the Communication Function Classification System, and the Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System, and representation of the distribution of the levels of each classification systems in comparison to the Gross Motor Function Classification System levels for children with cerebral palsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Japanese versions were developed using the back-translation method. For content validity, professionals were asked to complete a questionnaire including items on the appropriateness of the translation, its validity, and distinctions among levels. For reliability, professionals used the three classification systems twice in children with cerebral palsy. For concurrent validity, relationships among the four classification systems were examined by correlation analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants included twenty-one professionals and 290 children with cerebral palsy (mean age: 12 years two months, female: 132, male: 158). The content validity was generally good. For reliability, the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for the intraclass correlation coefficients was greater than 0.89, and the correlation coefficients were high.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study showed good reliability and validity of the functional classification systems in Japan.</p>","PeriodicalId":16692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":"223-233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric evaluation and distribution of classification systems in children with cerebral palsy in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Hisato Nishibu,&nbsp;Tsugumi Hosokawa Seino,&nbsp;Nobuaki Himuro\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/PRM-210098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study sought to examine the content validity, the intra- and inter-rater reliability, and concurrent validity of the Japanese versions of the Manual Ability Classification System, the Communication Function Classification System, and the Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System, and representation of the distribution of the levels of each classification systems in comparison to the Gross Motor Function Classification System levels for children with cerebral palsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Japanese versions were developed using the back-translation method. For content validity, professionals were asked to complete a questionnaire including items on the appropriateness of the translation, its validity, and distinctions among levels. For reliability, professionals used the three classification systems twice in children with cerebral palsy. For concurrent validity, relationships among the four classification systems were examined by correlation analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants included twenty-one professionals and 290 children with cerebral palsy (mean age: 12 years two months, female: 132, male: 158). The content validity was generally good. For reliability, the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for the intraclass correlation coefficients was greater than 0.89, and the correlation coefficients were high.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study showed good reliability and validity of the functional classification systems in Japan.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"223-233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/PRM-210098\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/PRM-210098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在检验日文《手能力分类系统》、《沟通功能分类系统》和《饮食能力分类系统》的内容效度、量表内效度和量表间效度,并比较各分类系统水平与脑瘫儿童大肌肉运动功能分类系统水平的分布。方法:采用反译法编制日文译本。对于内容效度,专业人员被要求完成一份调查问卷,包括翻译的适当性、有效性和水平之间的区别。为了提高可靠性,专业人员在脑瘫儿童中两次使用了这三种分类系统。对于并发效度,采用相关分析检验四个分类系统之间的关系。结果:参与者包括21名专业人员和290名脑瘫儿童(平均年龄:12岁2个月,女:132,男:158)。内容效度总体较好。信度方面,类内相关系数的95%置信区间下限大于0.89,相关系数较高。结论:本研究结果表明日本的功能分类体系具有良好的信度和效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychometric evaluation and distribution of classification systems in children with cerebral palsy in Japan.

Purpose: The study sought to examine the content validity, the intra- and inter-rater reliability, and concurrent validity of the Japanese versions of the Manual Ability Classification System, the Communication Function Classification System, and the Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System, and representation of the distribution of the levels of each classification systems in comparison to the Gross Motor Function Classification System levels for children with cerebral palsy.

Methods: The Japanese versions were developed using the back-translation method. For content validity, professionals were asked to complete a questionnaire including items on the appropriateness of the translation, its validity, and distinctions among levels. For reliability, professionals used the three classification systems twice in children with cerebral palsy. For concurrent validity, relationships among the four classification systems were examined by correlation analyses.

Results: Participants included twenty-one professionals and 290 children with cerebral palsy (mean age: 12 years two months, female: 132, male: 158). The content validity was generally good. For reliability, the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for the intraclass correlation coefficients was greater than 0.89, and the correlation coefficients were high.

Conclusion: The results of this study showed good reliability and validity of the functional classification systems in Japan.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
139
期刊最新文献
A confounding pediatric spinal cord injury: Anterior, central, or both? Does diagnosis matter? Evaluating impact of pediatric chronic pain diagnosis on pain and function. New-onset hydrocephalus in an adult with cerebral palsy: A case report and review of the literature. Caregiver and student perspectives on school services for students with traumatic brain injury during the COVID-19 pandemic. Review of Appetite for Risk-What it is, Who has it and How I survived, by Robert R. Abbott.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1