心源性休克中临时机械循环支持的新模式。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiology in Review Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-18 DOI:10.1097/CRD.0000000000000549
Ameesh Isath, Tzvi Fishkin, Yaakov Spira, William H Frishman, Wilbert S Aronow, Avi Levine, Alan Gass
{"title":"心源性休克中临时机械循环支持的新模式。","authors":"Ameesh Isath, Tzvi Fishkin, Yaakov Spira, William H Frishman, Wilbert S Aronow, Avi Levine, Alan Gass","doi":"10.1097/CRD.0000000000000549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening medical condition that requires prompt recognition and treatment. The use of standardized CS criteria, such as the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions criteria, can categorize patients and guide therapeutic strategies. Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices have become valuable tools in the treatment of CS, as they can provide cardiovascular support as a bridge to recovery, cardiac surgery, or advanced therapies such as cardiac transplant or durable ventricular assist devices. The use of MCS should be tailored to each individual patient, focused on a stepwise escalation of circulatory support to support both end-organ perfusion and myocardial recovery. As newer MCS devices reduce myocardial oxygen demand without increasing ischemia, the possibility of recovery is optimized. In this review, we discuss the different modalities of MCS focusing on the mechanism of support and the advantages and disadvantages of each device.</p>","PeriodicalId":9549,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology in Review","volume":" ","pages":"41-45"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emerging Modalities for Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock.\",\"authors\":\"Ameesh Isath, Tzvi Fishkin, Yaakov Spira, William H Frishman, Wilbert S Aronow, Avi Levine, Alan Gass\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CRD.0000000000000549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening medical condition that requires prompt recognition and treatment. The use of standardized CS criteria, such as the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions criteria, can categorize patients and guide therapeutic strategies. Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices have become valuable tools in the treatment of CS, as they can provide cardiovascular support as a bridge to recovery, cardiac surgery, or advanced therapies such as cardiac transplant or durable ventricular assist devices. The use of MCS should be tailored to each individual patient, focused on a stepwise escalation of circulatory support to support both end-organ perfusion and myocardial recovery. As newer MCS devices reduce myocardial oxygen demand without increasing ischemia, the possibility of recovery is optimized. In this review, we discuss the different modalities of MCS focusing on the mechanism of support and the advantages and disadvantages of each device.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology in Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"41-45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology in Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CRD.0000000000000549\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology in Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CRD.0000000000000549","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心源性休克(CS)是一种危及生命的疾病,需要及时识别和治疗。使用标准化的CS标准,如心血管血管造影和干预协会标准,可以对患者进行分类并指导治疗策略。临时机械循环支持装置(MCS)已成为治疗CS的宝贵工具,因为它们可以提供心血管支持,作为恢复,心脏手术或先进治疗(如心脏移植或耐用心室辅助装置)的桥梁。MCS的使用应针对每位患者,重点是逐步增加循环支持,以支持终末器官灌注和心肌恢复。由于新的MCS设备在不增加缺血的情况下减少心肌需氧量,因此恢复的可能性得到了优化。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了MCS的不同模式,重点是支持机制和每种设备的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Emerging Modalities for Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock.

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening medical condition that requires prompt recognition and treatment. The use of standardized CS criteria, such as the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions criteria, can categorize patients and guide therapeutic strategies. Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices have become valuable tools in the treatment of CS, as they can provide cardiovascular support as a bridge to recovery, cardiac surgery, or advanced therapies such as cardiac transplant or durable ventricular assist devices. The use of MCS should be tailored to each individual patient, focused on a stepwise escalation of circulatory support to support both end-organ perfusion and myocardial recovery. As newer MCS devices reduce myocardial oxygen demand without increasing ischemia, the possibility of recovery is optimized. In this review, we discuss the different modalities of MCS focusing on the mechanism of support and the advantages and disadvantages of each device.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology in Review
Cardiology in Review CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Cardiology in Review is to publish reviews on topics of current interest in cardiology that will foster increased understanding of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, clinical course, prevention, and treatment of cardiovascular disorders. Articles of the highest quality are written by authorities in the field and published promptly in a readable format with visual appeal
期刊最新文献
Long Saphenous Vein Harvesting: Reviewing Various Techniques. Review of the Etiology, Diagnosis, and Therapy of Left Atrial Thrombus. New Therapy Update Aprocitentan: An Endothelin Receptor Antagonist for the Treatment of Drug-Resistant Systemic Hypertension. Mitral Annular Disjunction: A Scoping Review. Safety and Efficacy of Nondihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blockers for Acute Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation with Rapid Ventricular Response and Comorbid Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1