{"title":"光致变色隐形眼镜在正常和弱光条件下的意外视觉表现:两项随机试验的分析","authors":"John Buch, Leilani Sonoda, Jessica Cannon","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2022.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Evaluate the performance of a photochromic contact lens in various lighting conditions throughout the day, including those indoor and outdoor environments where the photochromic contact lens is in a less active or inactive state.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data from two clinical trials of a photochromic contact lens were analyzed to evaluate its performance in various light environments. Both studies involved a photochromic test lens (ACUVUE® OASYS with Transitions™ Light Intelligent Technology™) and a similar non-photochromic control lens (ACUVUE® OASYS 2-week with HYDRACLEAR® PLUS). The studies were both multi-visit, multi-site, 2-treatment by 3-period randomized crossover (i.e., Test/Control/Control or Control/Test/Test) dispensing studies, with follow-up visits after each 2-week dispensing period.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 250 subjects were dispensed lenses across both studies, of which 237 total subjects completed. In situations where exposure to an activating light source is common (e.g., outdoors), the Test lens was preferred nearly 6:1 over the control lens. In situations where exposure to an activating light source is less common – indoors, driving at night, using digital devices –, the Test lens was still preferred over the control lens by margins of 4:1, nearly 4:1, and over 3:1 respectively. The Test lens was superior with respect to quality of vision, ability to see comfortably, clarity of vision, reduction of squinting while using computers and reduction of bright light while driving at night.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The photochromic test contact lens was rated superior to a non-photochromic control lens in environmental situations where the lens is in a less active or inactive state.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"16 2","pages":"Pages 135-142"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10104794/pdf/main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unexpected vision performance with photochromic contact lenses in normal and low light conditions: An analysis of two randomized trials\",\"authors\":\"John Buch, Leilani Sonoda, Jessica Cannon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.optom.2022.06.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Evaluate the performance of a photochromic contact lens in various lighting conditions throughout the day, including those indoor and outdoor environments where the photochromic contact lens is in a less active or inactive state.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data from two clinical trials of a photochromic contact lens were analyzed to evaluate its performance in various light environments. Both studies involved a photochromic test lens (ACUVUE® OASYS with Transitions™ Light Intelligent Technology™) and a similar non-photochromic control lens (ACUVUE® OASYS 2-week with HYDRACLEAR® PLUS). The studies were both multi-visit, multi-site, 2-treatment by 3-period randomized crossover (i.e., Test/Control/Control or Control/Test/Test) dispensing studies, with follow-up visits after each 2-week dispensing period.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 250 subjects were dispensed lenses across both studies, of which 237 total subjects completed. In situations where exposure to an activating light source is common (e.g., outdoors), the Test lens was preferred nearly 6:1 over the control lens. In situations where exposure to an activating light source is less common – indoors, driving at night, using digital devices –, the Test lens was still preferred over the control lens by margins of 4:1, nearly 4:1, and over 3:1 respectively. The Test lens was superior with respect to quality of vision, ability to see comfortably, clarity of vision, reduction of squinting while using computers and reduction of bright light while driving at night.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The photochromic test contact lens was rated superior to a non-photochromic control lens in environmental situations where the lens is in a less active or inactive state.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Optometry\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 135-142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10104794/pdf/main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Optometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429622000383\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429622000383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
目的评估光致变色隐形眼镜在一天中的各种照明条件下的性能,包括那些光致变色镜片处于不太活跃或不活跃状态的室内和室外环境。方法对光致变色隐形眼镜的两项临床试验数据进行分析,评价其在不同光照环境下的性能。这两项研究都涉及光致变色测试镜片(ACVUE®OASYS with Transitions™ 轻智能技术™) 和类似的非光致变色控制镜片(ACVUE®OASYS 2周,带HYDRACLEAR®PLUS)。这两项研究都是通过3周期随机交叉(即试验/对照/对照或对照/试验/试验)进行的多访视、多部位、2次治疗的配药研究,每2周配药期后进行随访。结果在两项研究中,共有250名受试者被分配了镜片,其中237名受试人完成了镜片分配。在暴露于激活光源的情况下(例如,室外),测试透镜比对照透镜优选接近6:1。在暴露于激活光源的情况下不太常见——室内、夜间驾驶、使用数字设备——测试镜头仍然比控制镜头更受欢迎,分别为4:1、接近4:1和超过3:1。测试镜片在视觉质量、舒适视觉能力、视觉清晰度、使用电脑时减少斜视以及夜间驾驶时减少明亮光线方面都很出色。结论光致变色测试隐形眼镜在镜片处于较低活性或非活性状态的环境中优于非光致变色对照镜片。
Unexpected vision performance with photochromic contact lenses in normal and low light conditions: An analysis of two randomized trials
Purpose
Evaluate the performance of a photochromic contact lens in various lighting conditions throughout the day, including those indoor and outdoor environments where the photochromic contact lens is in a less active or inactive state.
Methods
Data from two clinical trials of a photochromic contact lens were analyzed to evaluate its performance in various light environments. Both studies involved a photochromic test lens (ACUVUE® OASYS with Transitions™ Light Intelligent Technology™) and a similar non-photochromic control lens (ACUVUE® OASYS 2-week with HYDRACLEAR® PLUS). The studies were both multi-visit, multi-site, 2-treatment by 3-period randomized crossover (i.e., Test/Control/Control or Control/Test/Test) dispensing studies, with follow-up visits after each 2-week dispensing period.
Results
A total of 250 subjects were dispensed lenses across both studies, of which 237 total subjects completed. In situations where exposure to an activating light source is common (e.g., outdoors), the Test lens was preferred nearly 6:1 over the control lens. In situations where exposure to an activating light source is less common – indoors, driving at night, using digital devices –, the Test lens was still preferred over the control lens by margins of 4:1, nearly 4:1, and over 3:1 respectively. The Test lens was superior with respect to quality of vision, ability to see comfortably, clarity of vision, reduction of squinting while using computers and reduction of bright light while driving at night.
Conclusion
The photochromic test contact lens was rated superior to a non-photochromic control lens in environmental situations where the lens is in a less active or inactive state.