第9.3章:日常除龋的最新概念。

Q2 Dentistry Monographs in Oral Science Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000530613
Marisa Maltz, Juliana Jobim Jardim, Luana Severo Alves
{"title":"第9.3章:日常除龋的最新概念。","authors":"Marisa Maltz,&nbsp;Juliana Jobim Jardim,&nbsp;Luana Severo Alves","doi":"10.1159/000530613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the discussion about the amount of carious dentin to be removed during cavity preparation is quite old, concepts for caries removal have evolved and changed considerably over the last decades. The antiquate understanding that it was necessary to eliminate the microbial contamination of a cavity before placing the restoration was replaced by the current knowledge that maintaining contaminated dentin beneath restorations is inevitable and is not associated with treatment failure. This chapter brings together the body of evidence behind carious dentin removal to indicate a conservative treatment, aiming to preserve both tooth vitality and structure. Studies that evaluated the effects of sealing contaminated dentin are described, which are focused on different outcomes, such as microbiological counts, clinical characteristics, laboratory analysis, and radiographic findings. Long-term studies and randomized clinical trials also support the current recommendations. After addressing the available literature on this topic, this chapter concludes that (1) the amount of carious dentin to be removed should be defined by lesion depth; (2) sealing and/or selective caries removal to firm dentin is recommended for the management of shallow and moderate lesions; (3) the selective caries removal to soft dentin in a single session is indicated for deep caries lesions aiming to preserve tooth vitality; and (4) the use of a cavity liner after selective caries removal seems to be an unnecessary clinical step.</p>","PeriodicalId":35771,"journal":{"name":"Monographs in Oral Science","volume":"31 ","pages":"172-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chapter 9.3: Current Concepts of Caries Removal in Daily Practice.\",\"authors\":\"Marisa Maltz,&nbsp;Juliana Jobim Jardim,&nbsp;Luana Severo Alves\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000530613\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although the discussion about the amount of carious dentin to be removed during cavity preparation is quite old, concepts for caries removal have evolved and changed considerably over the last decades. The antiquate understanding that it was necessary to eliminate the microbial contamination of a cavity before placing the restoration was replaced by the current knowledge that maintaining contaminated dentin beneath restorations is inevitable and is not associated with treatment failure. This chapter brings together the body of evidence behind carious dentin removal to indicate a conservative treatment, aiming to preserve both tooth vitality and structure. Studies that evaluated the effects of sealing contaminated dentin are described, which are focused on different outcomes, such as microbiological counts, clinical characteristics, laboratory analysis, and radiographic findings. Long-term studies and randomized clinical trials also support the current recommendations. After addressing the available literature on this topic, this chapter concludes that (1) the amount of carious dentin to be removed should be defined by lesion depth; (2) sealing and/or selective caries removal to firm dentin is recommended for the management of shallow and moderate lesions; (3) the selective caries removal to soft dentin in a single session is indicated for deep caries lesions aiming to preserve tooth vitality; and (4) the use of a cavity liner after selective caries removal seems to be an unnecessary clinical step.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monographs in Oral Science\",\"volume\":\"31 \",\"pages\":\"172-187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monographs in Oral Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000530613\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monographs in Oral Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000530613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然关于龋齿准备过程中需要清除的牙本质数量的讨论相当古老,但在过去的几十年里,龋齿清除的概念已经发生了很大的变化。在放置修复体之前,有必要消除牙腔的微生物污染,这种陈旧的理解被当前的知识所取代,即在修复体下保持被污染的牙本质是不可避免的,与治疗失败无关。本章汇集了龋齿牙本质去除背后的证据,以表明保守治疗,旨在保持牙齿的活力和结构。本文描述了评估密封污染牙本质效果的研究,这些研究的重点是不同的结果,如微生物计数、临床特征、实验室分析和放射学结果。长期研究和随机临床试验也支持目前的建议。在讨论了有关该主题的现有文献后,本章得出结论:(1)应根据病变深度确定要去除的龋齿本质的数量;(2)对于轻度和中度病变,建议封闭和/或选择性除龋以稳固牙本质;(3)对于深部龋病,为保持牙齿活力,应选择一次除龋至软牙本质;(4)选择性除龋后使用牙槽衬垫似乎是一个不必要的临床步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chapter 9.3: Current Concepts of Caries Removal in Daily Practice.

Although the discussion about the amount of carious dentin to be removed during cavity preparation is quite old, concepts for caries removal have evolved and changed considerably over the last decades. The antiquate understanding that it was necessary to eliminate the microbial contamination of a cavity before placing the restoration was replaced by the current knowledge that maintaining contaminated dentin beneath restorations is inevitable and is not associated with treatment failure. This chapter brings together the body of evidence behind carious dentin removal to indicate a conservative treatment, aiming to preserve both tooth vitality and structure. Studies that evaluated the effects of sealing contaminated dentin are described, which are focused on different outcomes, such as microbiological counts, clinical characteristics, laboratory analysis, and radiographic findings. Long-term studies and randomized clinical trials also support the current recommendations. After addressing the available literature on this topic, this chapter concludes that (1) the amount of carious dentin to be removed should be defined by lesion depth; (2) sealing and/or selective caries removal to firm dentin is recommended for the management of shallow and moderate lesions; (3) the selective caries removal to soft dentin in a single session is indicated for deep caries lesions aiming to preserve tooth vitality; and (4) the use of a cavity liner after selective caries removal seems to be an unnecessary clinical step.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Monographs in Oral Science
Monographs in Oral Science Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: For two decades, ‘Monographs in Oral Science’ has provided a source of in-depth discussion of selected topics in the sciences related to stomatology. Senior investigators are invited to present expanded contributions in their fields of special expertise. The topics chosen are those which have generated a long-standing interest, and on which new conceptual insights or innovative biotechnology are making considerable impact. Authors are selected on the basis of having made lasting contributions to their chosen field and their willingness to share their findings with others.
期刊最新文献
Chapter 8: Risk Assessment: Considerations for Coronal Caries. Chapter 9.4: Operative Treatment and Monitoring of Coronal Caries in Daily Practice. Chapter 9.3: Current Concepts of Caries Removal in Daily Practice. Chapter 9.1: The Use of Fluorides in the Control of Coronal Caries. Chapter 6: Diagnostic Considerations regarding Coronal Caries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1