口腔和双增强胃超声造影评价非手术治疗胃淋巴瘤的疗效。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS Medical Ultrasonography Pub Date : 2023-09-29 Epub Date: 2023-06-19 DOI:10.11152/mu-4007
Ziwei Wen, Xuemei He, Chongqing Chen, Jing Sun, Jiangyan Yin, Tiantian Wang, Ziyu Liu, Li Wang, Nanlan Yang
{"title":"口腔和双增强胃超声造影评价非手术治疗胃淋巴瘤的疗效。","authors":"Ziwei Wen,&nbsp;Xuemei He,&nbsp;Chongqing Chen,&nbsp;Jing Sun,&nbsp;Jiangyan Yin,&nbsp;Tiantian Wang,&nbsp;Ziyu Liu,&nbsp;Li Wang,&nbsp;Nanlan Yang","doi":"10.11152/mu-4007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the feasibility of assessing the ecacy of non-surgical treatment for gastric lymphoma using oral contrast-enhanced ultrasound (OCEUS) and double contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCEUS).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 27 patients with gastric lymphoma treated nonoperatively were included in this retrospective study. The ecacy was evaluated using OCEUS and CT, respectively, and the results were tested for kappa concordance. Sixteen of the 27 patients underwent multiple DCEUS examinations before and after treatment. Micro-perfusion of the lesion in DCEUS is represented by the Echo Intensity Ratio (EIR), (echo intensity of the lymphoma lesion/echo intensity of the normal gastric wall), and one-way ANOVA was used to compare the differences between groups in EIR values before and after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OCEUS and CT were highly consistent in assessing the efficacy of gastric lymphoma, with a Kappa value of 0.758. During a median follow-up of 8.8 months, there was no statistical difference between the complete remission rate obtained by OCEUS and that obtained by endoscopic and CT (25.93% vs. 44.44%, p=0.154; 25.93% vs. 33.33%, p=0.766). There was also no statistical difference in the time to achieve complete remission using OCEUS assessment and endoscopy and CT (4.71±1.03 months vs. 6.01±2.14 months, p=0.088; 4.47±1.84 months vs. 6.01±2.14 months p=0.143). The difference in EIR between the groups before treat-ment and after different numbers of treatments was statistically signifficant (p<0.05), and post hoc analysis revealed this dif-ference as early as after the second treatment (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Transabdominal OCEUS and CT are comparable in the assessment of gastric lymphoma treatment ecacy. DCEUS is a noninvasive, cost-effective, and widely available method for gastric lymphoma therapeutic effect evaluation. Therefore, transabdominal OCEUS and DCEUS have the potential to be used for the early assessment of the ecacy of the non-surgical treatment of gastric lymphoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":48781,"journal":{"name":"Medical Ultrasonography","volume":" ","pages":"255-262"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the efficacy of gastric lymphoma treated with non-surgical therapy using oral and double contrast-enhanced gastric ultrasonography.\",\"authors\":\"Ziwei Wen,&nbsp;Xuemei He,&nbsp;Chongqing Chen,&nbsp;Jing Sun,&nbsp;Jiangyan Yin,&nbsp;Tiantian Wang,&nbsp;Ziyu Liu,&nbsp;Li Wang,&nbsp;Nanlan Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.11152/mu-4007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the feasibility of assessing the ecacy of non-surgical treatment for gastric lymphoma using oral contrast-enhanced ultrasound (OCEUS) and double contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCEUS).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 27 patients with gastric lymphoma treated nonoperatively were included in this retrospective study. The ecacy was evaluated using OCEUS and CT, respectively, and the results were tested for kappa concordance. Sixteen of the 27 patients underwent multiple DCEUS examinations before and after treatment. Micro-perfusion of the lesion in DCEUS is represented by the Echo Intensity Ratio (EIR), (echo intensity of the lymphoma lesion/echo intensity of the normal gastric wall), and one-way ANOVA was used to compare the differences between groups in EIR values before and after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OCEUS and CT were highly consistent in assessing the efficacy of gastric lymphoma, with a Kappa value of 0.758. During a median follow-up of 8.8 months, there was no statistical difference between the complete remission rate obtained by OCEUS and that obtained by endoscopic and CT (25.93% vs. 44.44%, p=0.154; 25.93% vs. 33.33%, p=0.766). There was also no statistical difference in the time to achieve complete remission using OCEUS assessment and endoscopy and CT (4.71±1.03 months vs. 6.01±2.14 months, p=0.088; 4.47±1.84 months vs. 6.01±2.14 months p=0.143). The difference in EIR between the groups before treat-ment and after different numbers of treatments was statistically signifficant (p<0.05), and post hoc analysis revealed this dif-ference as early as after the second treatment (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Transabdominal OCEUS and CT are comparable in the assessment of gastric lymphoma treatment ecacy. DCEUS is a noninvasive, cost-effective, and widely available method for gastric lymphoma therapeutic effect evaluation. Therefore, transabdominal OCEUS and DCEUS have the potential to be used for the early assessment of the ecacy of the non-surgical treatment of gastric lymphoma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Ultrasonography\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"255-262\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Ultrasonography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11152/mu-4007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Ultrasonography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11152/mu-4007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨评估口服超声造影(OCEUS)和双超声造影(DCEUS)非手术治疗胃淋巴瘤的方法材料和方法:本回顾性研究共纳入27例非手术治疗的胃淋巴瘤患者。e分别使用OCEUS和CT评估cacy,并测试结果的kappa一致性。27名患者中有16名在治疗前后接受了多次DCEUS检查。DCEUS中病变的微灌注由回声强度比(EIR)表示,(淋巴瘤病变的回声强度/正常胃壁的回声强度),并使用单因素方差分析来比较治疗前后各组之间EIR值的差异。结果:OCEUS和CT在评估胃淋巴瘤疗效方面高度一致,Kappa值为0.758。在8.8个月的中位随访期间,OCEUS获得的完全缓解率与内窥镜和CT获得的完全减轻率之间没有统计学差异(25.93%对44.44%,p=0.154;25.93%对33.33%,p=0.766)。OCEUS评估和内窥镜及CT获得完全缓解的时间也没有统计学差异(4.71±1.03个月vs.6.01±2.14个月,p=0.088;4.47±1.84个月vs.6.01±214个月,p=0.143)。治疗前和不同治疗次数后两组的EIR差异具有统计学意义(p结论:经腹部OCUS和CT在评估胃淋巴瘤治疗效果方面具有可比性cacy。DCEUS是一种无创、低成本、广泛应用的胃淋巴瘤治疗效果评估方法。因此,经腹部OCEUS和DCEUS有可能用于早期评估胃淋巴瘤的非手术治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the efficacy of gastric lymphoma treated with non-surgical therapy using oral and double contrast-enhanced gastric ultrasonography.

Aim: To investigate the feasibility of assessing the ecacy of non-surgical treatment for gastric lymphoma using oral contrast-enhanced ultrasound (OCEUS) and double contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCEUS).

Material and methods: A total of 27 patients with gastric lymphoma treated nonoperatively were included in this retrospective study. The ecacy was evaluated using OCEUS and CT, respectively, and the results were tested for kappa concordance. Sixteen of the 27 patients underwent multiple DCEUS examinations before and after treatment. Micro-perfusion of the lesion in DCEUS is represented by the Echo Intensity Ratio (EIR), (echo intensity of the lymphoma lesion/echo intensity of the normal gastric wall), and one-way ANOVA was used to compare the differences between groups in EIR values before and after treatment.

Results: OCEUS and CT were highly consistent in assessing the efficacy of gastric lymphoma, with a Kappa value of 0.758. During a median follow-up of 8.8 months, there was no statistical difference between the complete remission rate obtained by OCEUS and that obtained by endoscopic and CT (25.93% vs. 44.44%, p=0.154; 25.93% vs. 33.33%, p=0.766). There was also no statistical difference in the time to achieve complete remission using OCEUS assessment and endoscopy and CT (4.71±1.03 months vs. 6.01±2.14 months, p=0.088; 4.47±1.84 months vs. 6.01±2.14 months p=0.143). The difference in EIR between the groups before treat-ment and after different numbers of treatments was statistically signifficant (p<0.05), and post hoc analysis revealed this dif-ference as early as after the second treatment (p<0.05).

Conclusions: Transabdominal OCEUS and CT are comparable in the assessment of gastric lymphoma treatment ecacy. DCEUS is a noninvasive, cost-effective, and widely available method for gastric lymphoma therapeutic effect evaluation. Therefore, transabdominal OCEUS and DCEUS have the potential to be used for the early assessment of the ecacy of the non-surgical treatment of gastric lymphoma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Ultrasonography
Medical Ultrasonography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: The journal aims to promote ultrasound diagnosis by publishing papers in a variety of categories, including editorial letters, original papers, review articles, pictorial essays, technical developments, case reports, letters to the editor or occasional special reports (fundamental, clinical as well as methodological and educational papers). The papers published cover the whole spectrum of the applications of diagnostic medical ultrasonography, including basic science and therapeutic applications. The journal hosts information regarding the society''s activities, scheduling of accredited training courses in ultrasound diagnosis, as well as the agenda of national and international scientific events.
期刊最新文献
Comments and illustrations of the WFUMB CEUS liver guidelines: Rare benign focal liver lesion, part II. Comments and illustrations of the WFUMB CEUS liver guidelines: Rare benign focal liver lesion, part I. Comments on and illustrations of the WFUMB CEUS liver guidelines: Rare malignant neuroendocrine and predominant epithelioid liver lesions. Clinical application value of Ultrafast Pulse Wave Velocity in early cardiovascular injury of Immunoglobulin A nephropathy. Quantitative assessment of early kidney injury using high frame rate contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in a rabbit model of diabetic nephropathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1