婴儿研究中的多样性和代表性:通向婴儿发展全球化科学的障碍和桥梁

IF 2 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Infancy Pub Date : 2023-05-22 DOI:10.1111/infa.12545
Leher Singh, Alejandrina Cristia, Lana B. Karasik, Sarah J. Rajendra, Lisa M. Oakes
{"title":"婴儿研究中的多样性和代表性:通向婴儿发展全球化科学的障碍和桥梁","authors":"Leher Singh,&nbsp;Alejandrina Cristia,&nbsp;Lana B. Karasik,&nbsp;Sarah J. Rajendra,&nbsp;Lisa M. Oakes","doi":"10.1111/infa.12545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Psychological researchers have become increasingly concerned with generalized accounts of human behavior based on narrow participant representation. This concern is particularly germane to infant research as findings from infant studies are often invoked to theorize broadly about the origins of human behavior. In this article, we examined participant diversity and representation in research published on infant development in four journals over the past decade. Sociodemographic data were coded for all articles reporting infant data published in <i>Child Development, Developmental Science, Developmental Psychology</i>, and <i>Infancy</i> between 2011 and 2022. Analyses of 1682 empirical articles, sampling approximately 1 million participants, revealed consistent under-reporting of sociodemographic information. For studies that reported sociodemographic characteristics, there was an unwavering skew toward White infants from North America/Western Europe. To address a lack of diversity in infant studies and its scientific impact, a set of principles and practices are proposed to advance toward a more globally representative science.</p>","PeriodicalId":47895,"journal":{"name":"Infancy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/infa.12545","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diversity and representation in infant research: Barriers and bridges toward a globalized science of infant development\",\"authors\":\"Leher Singh,&nbsp;Alejandrina Cristia,&nbsp;Lana B. Karasik,&nbsp;Sarah J. Rajendra,&nbsp;Lisa M. Oakes\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/infa.12545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Psychological researchers have become increasingly concerned with generalized accounts of human behavior based on narrow participant representation. This concern is particularly germane to infant research as findings from infant studies are often invoked to theorize broadly about the origins of human behavior. In this article, we examined participant diversity and representation in research published on infant development in four journals over the past decade. Sociodemographic data were coded for all articles reporting infant data published in <i>Child Development, Developmental Science, Developmental Psychology</i>, and <i>Infancy</i> between 2011 and 2022. Analyses of 1682 empirical articles, sampling approximately 1 million participants, revealed consistent under-reporting of sociodemographic information. For studies that reported sociodemographic characteristics, there was an unwavering skew toward White infants from North America/Western Europe. To address a lack of diversity in infant studies and its scientific impact, a set of principles and practices are proposed to advance toward a more globally representative science.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infancy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/infa.12545\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infancy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/infa.12545\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infancy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/infa.12545","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

心理学研究人员越来越关注基于狭隘参与者表征的人类行为的广义描述。这种关注与婴儿研究特别相关,因为婴儿研究的结果经常被用来广泛地理论化人类行为的起源。在这篇文章中,我们研究了过去十年来在四种期刊上发表的关于婴儿发育的研究中参与者的多样性和代表性。对2011年至2022年间发表在《儿童发展》、《发展科学》、《发展心理学》和《婴儿期》上的所有报告婴儿数据的文章进行社会人口统计数据编码。对1682篇实证文章的分析,抽样了大约100万参与者,揭示了社会人口统计信息的一致低报。在报告社会人口特征的研究中,来自北美/西欧的白人婴儿坚定不移地倾向于白人婴儿。为了解决婴儿研究缺乏多样性及其科学影响的问题,提出了一套原则和实践,以促进更具全球代表性的科学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diversity and representation in infant research: Barriers and bridges toward a globalized science of infant development

Psychological researchers have become increasingly concerned with generalized accounts of human behavior based on narrow participant representation. This concern is particularly germane to infant research as findings from infant studies are often invoked to theorize broadly about the origins of human behavior. In this article, we examined participant diversity and representation in research published on infant development in four journals over the past decade. Sociodemographic data were coded for all articles reporting infant data published in Child Development, Developmental Science, Developmental Psychology, and Infancy between 2011 and 2022. Analyses of 1682 empirical articles, sampling approximately 1 million participants, revealed consistent under-reporting of sociodemographic information. For studies that reported sociodemographic characteristics, there was an unwavering skew toward White infants from North America/Western Europe. To address a lack of diversity in infant studies and its scientific impact, a set of principles and practices are proposed to advance toward a more globally representative science.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infancy
Infancy PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Infancy, the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies, emphasizes the highest quality original research on normal and aberrant infant development during the first two years. Both human and animal research are included. In addition to regular length research articles and brief reports (3000-word maximum), the journal includes solicited target articles along with a series of commentaries; debates, in which different theoretical positions are presented along with a series of commentaries; and thematic collections, a group of three to five reports or summaries of research on the same issue, conducted independently at different laboratories, with invited commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Infants show negative changes in affect and physiology when re-experiencing a stressor, its context, and a positive event 24-h later. Issue Information Double it up: Vocabulary size comparisons between UK bilingual and monolingual toddlers Positive coparenting previous to the COVID-19 pandemic can buffer regulatory problems in infants facing the COVID-19 pandemic Correlates of infant pointing frequency in the first year
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1