成人多发性硬化症不同住院水平社区流动性的探索性研究。

Q1 Nursing International journal of MS care Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-27 DOI:10.7224/1537-2073.2022-042
Carley Giroux, Barbara Sogoloff, Lance Bergmans, Myeongjin Bae, Michael Vannostrand, Susan L Kasser
{"title":"成人多发性硬化症不同住院水平社区流动性的探索性研究。","authors":"Carley Giroux,&nbsp;Barbara Sogoloff,&nbsp;Lance Bergmans,&nbsp;Myeongjin Bae,&nbsp;Michael Vannostrand,&nbsp;Susan L Kasser","doi":"10.7224/1537-2073.2022-042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to identify differences in community mobility in adults with multiple sclerosis (MS) at various ambulation levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-one adults with MS completed a survey about their mobility impairment and avoidance of challenging mobility tasks. Individuals were categorized as having mild, moderate, or severe gait impairment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants across the different functional groups significantly differed in perceived ambulation disability, fatigue impact, falls efficacy, quality of life, challenges with dual-tasking, and self-efficacy for community mobility. There were no significant differences between the mild and moderate gait impairment groups in crossing a busy street or going out in different ambient conditions. Significant differences were found between those with mild impairment and those with severe impairment in avoidance of various terrain elements, heavy manual doors, postural transitions, attentional situations, and crowded places. The only environmental dimension that significantly differed across all 3 groups was carrying 2 or more items, in which avoidance increased as ambulation worsened.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Avoidance behavior for particular environmental features can begin relatively early in the disease process. This underscores the need to further study mobility differences, community ambulation, and participation restrictions in adults with MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":14150,"journal":{"name":"International journal of MS care","volume":"25 4","pages":"145-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10353691/pdf/i1537-2073-25-4-145.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Exploratory Study of Community Mobility in Adults With Multiple Sclerosis Across Different Ambulation Levels.\",\"authors\":\"Carley Giroux,&nbsp;Barbara Sogoloff,&nbsp;Lance Bergmans,&nbsp;Myeongjin Bae,&nbsp;Michael Vannostrand,&nbsp;Susan L Kasser\",\"doi\":\"10.7224/1537-2073.2022-042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to identify differences in community mobility in adults with multiple sclerosis (MS) at various ambulation levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-one adults with MS completed a survey about their mobility impairment and avoidance of challenging mobility tasks. Individuals were categorized as having mild, moderate, or severe gait impairment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants across the different functional groups significantly differed in perceived ambulation disability, fatigue impact, falls efficacy, quality of life, challenges with dual-tasking, and self-efficacy for community mobility. There were no significant differences between the mild and moderate gait impairment groups in crossing a busy street or going out in different ambient conditions. Significant differences were found between those with mild impairment and those with severe impairment in avoidance of various terrain elements, heavy manual doors, postural transitions, attentional situations, and crowded places. The only environmental dimension that significantly differed across all 3 groups was carrying 2 or more items, in which avoidance increased as ambulation worsened.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Avoidance behavior for particular environmental features can begin relatively early in the disease process. This underscores the need to further study mobility differences, community ambulation, and participation restrictions in adults with MS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of MS care\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"145-151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10353691/pdf/i1537-2073-25-4-145.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of MS care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2022-042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/2/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of MS care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2022-042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是确定多发性硬化症(MS)成年人在不同活动水平下的社区流动性差异。方法:71名患有多发性硬化症的成年人完成了一项关于他们的行动障碍和避免挑战性行动任务的调查。个体被分为轻度、中度或重度步态障碍。结果:不同功能组的参与者在感知行走障碍、疲劳影响、跌倒效能、生活质量、双重任务挑战和社区行动自我效能方面存在显著差异。轻度和中度步态障碍组在穿过繁忙街道或在不同环境条件下外出方面没有显著差异。轻度障碍者和重度障碍者在避免各种地形因素、重型手动门、姿势转换、注意力状况和拥挤场所方面存在显著差异。所有3组中唯一存在显著差异的环境维度是携带2件或2件以上物品,其中回避次数随着行走情况的恶化而增加。结论:对特定环境特征的回避行为可以在疾病过程的相对早期开始。这强调了进一步研究多发性硬化症成年人的行动差异、社区活动和参与限制的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Exploratory Study of Community Mobility in Adults With Multiple Sclerosis Across Different Ambulation Levels.

Background: The purpose of this study was to identify differences in community mobility in adults with multiple sclerosis (MS) at various ambulation levels.

Methods: Seventy-one adults with MS completed a survey about their mobility impairment and avoidance of challenging mobility tasks. Individuals were categorized as having mild, moderate, or severe gait impairment.

Results: Participants across the different functional groups significantly differed in perceived ambulation disability, fatigue impact, falls efficacy, quality of life, challenges with dual-tasking, and self-efficacy for community mobility. There were no significant differences between the mild and moderate gait impairment groups in crossing a busy street or going out in different ambient conditions. Significant differences were found between those with mild impairment and those with severe impairment in avoidance of various terrain elements, heavy manual doors, postural transitions, attentional situations, and crowded places. The only environmental dimension that significantly differed across all 3 groups was carrying 2 or more items, in which avoidance increased as ambulation worsened.

Conclusions: Avoidance behavior for particular environmental features can begin relatively early in the disease process. This underscores the need to further study mobility differences, community ambulation, and participation restrictions in adults with MS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of MS care
International journal of MS care Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Impact of Fingolimod Discontinuation Strategy on Recurrence of Disease Activity in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis. Expanding the Connection Between Cognition and Illness Intrusiveness in Multiple Sclerosis. Cognitive Function in Frail Older Adults With Multiple Sclerosis: An Exploratory Study Using Secondary Data Analysis. Exploring the Complexity of Falls in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Qualitative Study. Reasons for Hospital Admission in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1