开放式CAD-CAM系统不同组合制作氧化锆冠的配合度和正确率比较。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.4047/jap.2023.15.3.155
Eun-Bin Bae, Won-Tak Cho, Do-Hyun Park, Su-Hyun Hwang, So-Hyoun Lee, Mi-Jung Yun, Chang-Mo Jeong, Jung-Bo Huh
{"title":"开放式CAD-CAM系统不同组合制作氧化锆冠的配合度和正确率比较。","authors":"Eun-Bin Bae,&nbsp;Won-Tak Cho,&nbsp;Do-Hyun Park,&nbsp;Su-Hyun Hwang,&nbsp;So-Hyoun Lee,&nbsp;Mi-Jung Yun,&nbsp;Chang-Mo Jeong,&nbsp;Jung-Bo Huh","doi":"10.4047/jap.2023.15.3.155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to clinically compare the fitness and trueness of zirconia crowns fabricated by different combinations of open CAD-CAM systems.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Total of 40 patients were enrolled in this study, and 9 different zirconia crowns were prepared per patient. Each crown was made through the cross-application of 3 different design software (EZIS VR, 3Shape Dental System, Exocad) with 3 different processing devices (Aegis HM, Trione Z, Motion 2). The marginal gap, absolute marginal discrepancy, internal gap(axial, line angle, occlusal) by a silicone replica technique were measured to compare the fit of the crown. The scanned inner and outer surfaces of the crowns were compared to CAD data using 3D metrology software to evaluate trueness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant differences in the marginal gap, absolute marginal discrepancy, axial and line angle internal gap among the groups (<i>P</i> < .05) in the comparison of fit. There was no statistically significant difference among the groups in terms of occlusal internal gap. The trueness ranged from 36.19 to 43.78 µm but there was no statistically significant difference within the groups (<i>P</i> > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All 9 groups showed clinically acceptable level of marginal gaps ranging from 74.26 to 112.20 µm in terms of fit comparison. In the comparison of trueness, no significant difference within each group was spotted. Within the limitation of this study, open CAD-CAM systems used in this study can be assembled properly to fabricate zirconia crown.</p>","PeriodicalId":51291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d7/0e/jap-15-155.PMC10333096.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of fit and trueness of zirconia crowns fabricated by different combinations of open CAD-CAM systems.\",\"authors\":\"Eun-Bin Bae,&nbsp;Won-Tak Cho,&nbsp;Do-Hyun Park,&nbsp;Su-Hyun Hwang,&nbsp;So-Hyoun Lee,&nbsp;Mi-Jung Yun,&nbsp;Chang-Mo Jeong,&nbsp;Jung-Bo Huh\",\"doi\":\"10.4047/jap.2023.15.3.155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to clinically compare the fitness and trueness of zirconia crowns fabricated by different combinations of open CAD-CAM systems.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Total of 40 patients were enrolled in this study, and 9 different zirconia crowns were prepared per patient. Each crown was made through the cross-application of 3 different design software (EZIS VR, 3Shape Dental System, Exocad) with 3 different processing devices (Aegis HM, Trione Z, Motion 2). The marginal gap, absolute marginal discrepancy, internal gap(axial, line angle, occlusal) by a silicone replica technique were measured to compare the fit of the crown. The scanned inner and outer surfaces of the crowns were compared to CAD data using 3D metrology software to evaluate trueness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant differences in the marginal gap, absolute marginal discrepancy, axial and line angle internal gap among the groups (<i>P</i> < .05) in the comparison of fit. There was no statistically significant difference among the groups in terms of occlusal internal gap. The trueness ranged from 36.19 to 43.78 µm but there was no statistically significant difference within the groups (<i>P</i> > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All 9 groups showed clinically acceptable level of marginal gaps ranging from 74.26 to 112.20 µm in terms of fit comparison. In the comparison of trueness, no significant difference within each group was spotted. Within the limitation of this study, open CAD-CAM systems used in this study can be assembled properly to fabricate zirconia crown.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d7/0e/jap-15-155.PMC10333096.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2023.15.3.155\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2023.15.3.155","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:临床比较开放式CAD-CAM系统不同组合制作的氧化锆冠的适合度和正确度。材料与方法:本研究共纳入40例患者,每例患者制备9种不同的氧化锆冠。每个冠通过3种不同的设计软件(EZIS VR, 3Shape Dental System, Exocad)和3种不同的加工设备(Aegis HM, Trione Z, Motion 2)进行交叉应用。通过硅胶复制技术测量边缘间隙,绝对边缘差异,内部间隙(轴向,线角,咬合),以比较冠的配合程度。用三维测量软件将扫描的牙冠内、外表面与CAD数据进行比较,以评估准确性。结果:在拟合比较中,两组间的边缘间隙、绝对边缘差异、轴、线角内间隙差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组间牙合内间隙差异无统计学意义。正确率为36.19 ~ 43.78µm,组间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:经拟合比较,9组患者的边缘间隙在74.26 ~ 112.20µm之间,均达到临床可接受水平。在正确率的比较中,各组间差异无统计学意义。在本研究的限制下,本研究中使用的开放式CAD-CAM系统可以适当地组装以制造氧化锆冠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of fit and trueness of zirconia crowns fabricated by different combinations of open CAD-CAM systems.

Purpose: This study aims to clinically compare the fitness and trueness of zirconia crowns fabricated by different combinations of open CAD-CAM systems.

Materials and methods: Total of 40 patients were enrolled in this study, and 9 different zirconia crowns were prepared per patient. Each crown was made through the cross-application of 3 different design software (EZIS VR, 3Shape Dental System, Exocad) with 3 different processing devices (Aegis HM, Trione Z, Motion 2). The marginal gap, absolute marginal discrepancy, internal gap(axial, line angle, occlusal) by a silicone replica technique were measured to compare the fit of the crown. The scanned inner and outer surfaces of the crowns were compared to CAD data using 3D metrology software to evaluate trueness.

Results: There were significant differences in the marginal gap, absolute marginal discrepancy, axial and line angle internal gap among the groups (P < .05) in the comparison of fit. There was no statistically significant difference among the groups in terms of occlusal internal gap. The trueness ranged from 36.19 to 43.78 µm but there was no statistically significant difference within the groups (P > .05).

Conclusion: All 9 groups showed clinically acceptable level of marginal gaps ranging from 74.26 to 112.20 µm in terms of fit comparison. In the comparison of trueness, no significant difference within each group was spotted. Within the limitation of this study, open CAD-CAM systems used in this study can be assembled properly to fabricate zirconia crown.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: This journal aims to convey scientific and clinical progress in the field of prosthodontics and its related areas to many dental communities concerned with esthetic and functional restorations, occlusion, implants, prostheses, and biomaterials related to prosthodontics. This journal publishes • Original research data of high scientific merit in the field of diagnosis, function, esthetics and stomatognathic physiology related to prosthodontic rehabilitation, physiology and mechanics of occlusion, mechanical and biologic aspects of prosthodontic materials including dental implants. • Review articles by experts on controversies and new developments in prosthodontics. • Case reports if they provide or document new fundamental knowledge.
期刊最新文献
A novel brief questionnaire using a face rating scale to assess dental anxiety and fear. Clinical performance of implant-assisted removable partial dentures using implant surveyed crowns: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effect of cement type, luting protocol, and ceramic abutment material on the shade of cemented titanium-based lithium disilicate crowns and surrounding peri-implant soft tissue: a spectrophotometric analysis. Palatal vault configuration and its influence on intraoral scan time and accuracy in completely edentulous arches: a prospective clinical study. Recording maximal intercuspation and border positions of the mandible with intraoral scanner using the acquisition software's multi-occlusion function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1