Leonor de Freixo Ferreira, Cátia Guerra, M. A. Vieira-Coelho
{"title":"边缘型人格障碍患者放弃心理治疗的预测因素:系统回顾","authors":"Leonor de Freixo Ferreira, Cátia Guerra, M. A. Vieira-Coelho","doi":"10.1002/cpp.2888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a highly debilitating psychiatric condition. Despite the expansion of new BPD specific forms of psychotherapy in the last few decades, high dropout rates have been reported in these treatments. Treatment discontinuation is associated with poor patient outcomes, inefficient resource utilization and the demoralization of healthcare providers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In order to identify predictors of psychotherapy dropout among patients with BPD, a systematic search of Medline, the Cochrane Library, PsycInfo and PsycArticles was conducted. Studies included were randomized-controlled trials in which patients diagnosed with BPD were exposed to a therapeutic intervention consisted of an evidence-based psychotherapy. The quality of evidence in the studies was assessed through the use of revised Cochrane risk of bias tool.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Six articles, incorporating four types of psychotherapy programmes, were included. Overall, the studies present low risk of attrition and reporting bias and unclear risk of selection, performance and detection bias. Patients with weaker therapeutic alliance scores and higher hostility presented with higher dropout rates. In contrast, better mindfulness skills and greater performance in specific neuropsychological domains, such as memory and executive control, were identified as predictive of lower risk of dropout. Sociodemographic variables and treatment history did not influence treatment retention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Factors that influence discontinuation should be taken into consideration in future treatment programmes, in an effort to optimize retention. Qualitative assessments of patients' reasons for dropping out may also help guide adjustments.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"30 6","pages":"1324-1337"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of psychotherapy dropout in patients with borderline personality disorder: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Leonor de Freixo Ferreira, Cátia Guerra, M. A. Vieira-Coelho\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpp.2888\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a highly debilitating psychiatric condition. Despite the expansion of new BPD specific forms of psychotherapy in the last few decades, high dropout rates have been reported in these treatments. Treatment discontinuation is associated with poor patient outcomes, inefficient resource utilization and the demoralization of healthcare providers.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In order to identify predictors of psychotherapy dropout among patients with BPD, a systematic search of Medline, the Cochrane Library, PsycInfo and PsycArticles was conducted. Studies included were randomized-controlled trials in which patients diagnosed with BPD were exposed to a therapeutic intervention consisted of an evidence-based psychotherapy. The quality of evidence in the studies was assessed through the use of revised Cochrane risk of bias tool.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Six articles, incorporating four types of psychotherapy programmes, were included. Overall, the studies present low risk of attrition and reporting bias and unclear risk of selection, performance and detection bias. Patients with weaker therapeutic alliance scores and higher hostility presented with higher dropout rates. In contrast, better mindfulness skills and greater performance in specific neuropsychological domains, such as memory and executive control, were identified as predictive of lower risk of dropout. Sociodemographic variables and treatment history did not influence treatment retention.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Factors that influence discontinuation should be taken into consideration in future treatment programmes, in an effort to optimize retention. Qualitative assessments of patients' reasons for dropping out may also help guide adjustments.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\"30 6\",\"pages\":\"1324-1337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.2888\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.2888","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predictors of psychotherapy dropout in patients with borderline personality disorder: A systematic review
Introduction
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a highly debilitating psychiatric condition. Despite the expansion of new BPD specific forms of psychotherapy in the last few decades, high dropout rates have been reported in these treatments. Treatment discontinuation is associated with poor patient outcomes, inefficient resource utilization and the demoralization of healthcare providers.
Methods
In order to identify predictors of psychotherapy dropout among patients with BPD, a systematic search of Medline, the Cochrane Library, PsycInfo and PsycArticles was conducted. Studies included were randomized-controlled trials in which patients diagnosed with BPD were exposed to a therapeutic intervention consisted of an evidence-based psychotherapy. The quality of evidence in the studies was assessed through the use of revised Cochrane risk of bias tool.
Results
Six articles, incorporating four types of psychotherapy programmes, were included. Overall, the studies present low risk of attrition and reporting bias and unclear risk of selection, performance and detection bias. Patients with weaker therapeutic alliance scores and higher hostility presented with higher dropout rates. In contrast, better mindfulness skills and greater performance in specific neuropsychological domains, such as memory and executive control, were identified as predictive of lower risk of dropout. Sociodemographic variables and treatment history did not influence treatment retention.
Conclusions
Factors that influence discontinuation should be taken into consideration in future treatment programmes, in an effort to optimize retention. Qualitative assessments of patients' reasons for dropping out may also help guide adjustments.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.