斯堪的纳维亚在线癌症信息作为治理的表达:一项比较定性研究。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Advances in Nursing Science Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1097/ANS.0000000000000436
Elin Margrethe Aasen, Berit Misund Dahl, Aase Marie Ottesen, Jeanne Strunck, Henrik Erikson, Elisabeth Dahlborg, Åse Boman, Lisbeth Alnes Vestgarden, Ellinor Tengelin
{"title":"斯堪的纳维亚在线癌症信息作为治理的表达:一项比较定性研究。","authors":"Elin Margrethe Aasen,&nbsp;Berit Misund Dahl,&nbsp;Aase Marie Ottesen,&nbsp;Jeanne Strunck,&nbsp;Henrik Erikson,&nbsp;Elisabeth Dahlborg,&nbsp;Åse Boman,&nbsp;Lisbeth Alnes Vestgarden,&nbsp;Ellinor Tengelin","doi":"10.1097/ANS.0000000000000436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We compared online distributed information provided to patients with cancer in Scandinavian countries through the lens of governmentality. A secondary comparative qualitative analysis was conducted. Discourses in online patient information showed differences in governmentality techniques across the countries: Norway used a paternalist approach, Denmark an educative approach, and Sweden an individualistic approach and expected the patients to make the \"right\" decisions. Online information for patients with cancer in Denmark and Norway showed high professional and health care system involvement, whereas in Sweden, there was high patient involvement. There was almost no use of the person-centered approach among the online discourses.</p>","PeriodicalId":50857,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Nursing Science","volume":"46 3","pages":"293-305"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scandinavian Online Cancer Information as Expressions of Governmentality: A Comparative Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Elin Margrethe Aasen,&nbsp;Berit Misund Dahl,&nbsp;Aase Marie Ottesen,&nbsp;Jeanne Strunck,&nbsp;Henrik Erikson,&nbsp;Elisabeth Dahlborg,&nbsp;Åse Boman,&nbsp;Lisbeth Alnes Vestgarden,&nbsp;Ellinor Tengelin\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ANS.0000000000000436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We compared online distributed information provided to patients with cancer in Scandinavian countries through the lens of governmentality. A secondary comparative qualitative analysis was conducted. Discourses in online patient information showed differences in governmentality techniques across the countries: Norway used a paternalist approach, Denmark an educative approach, and Sweden an individualistic approach and expected the patients to make the \\\"right\\\" decisions. Online information for patients with cancer in Denmark and Norway showed high professional and health care system involvement, whereas in Sweden, there was high patient involvement. There was almost no use of the person-centered approach among the online discourses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Nursing Science\",\"volume\":\"46 3\",\"pages\":\"293-305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Nursing Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000436\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Nursing Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000436","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们比较了斯堪的纳维亚国家通过政府管理向癌症患者提供的在线分布信息。进行二次比较定性分析。在线患者信息的论述显示了不同国家治理技术的差异:挪威采用家长式方法,丹麦采用教育方法,瑞典采用个人主义方法,并期望患者做出“正确”的决定。丹麦和挪威癌症患者的在线信息显示,专业人员和卫生保健系统的参与度很高,而在瑞典,患者参与度很高。在线讨论中几乎没有使用以人为本的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Scandinavian Online Cancer Information as Expressions of Governmentality: A Comparative Qualitative Study.

We compared online distributed information provided to patients with cancer in Scandinavian countries through the lens of governmentality. A secondary comparative qualitative analysis was conducted. Discourses in online patient information showed differences in governmentality techniques across the countries: Norway used a paternalist approach, Denmark an educative approach, and Sweden an individualistic approach and expected the patients to make the "right" decisions. Online information for patients with cancer in Denmark and Norway showed high professional and health care system involvement, whereas in Sweden, there was high patient involvement. There was almost no use of the person-centered approach among the online discourses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
93
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Consistently ranked as one of the most-read and most assigned journals by faculties of graduate programs in nursing, Advances in Nursing Science (ANS) is intellectually challenging, innovative and progressive, and features articles from a wide range of scholarly traditions. The journal particularly encourages works that speak to the need for global sustainability and that take an intersectional approach, recognizing class, color, sexual and gender identity, and other dimensions of human experience related to health. Articles in ANS are peer-reviewed and chosen for their pioneering perspectives and for their significance in contributing the evolution of the discipline of nursing.
期刊最新文献
Exploring Research Trends on Digital Health in Nursing Science in Korea: A Topic Modeling Approach. Nursing Professional Identity: A Critical Review of the Concept Amidst COVID-19. Bibliometric Analysis (2000-2024) of Research on Artificial Intelligence in Nursing. Capturing Intersections of Discrimination: Quantitative Analysis of Nursing Students' Experiences. Empowering Nurses Through Data Literacy and Data Science Literacy: Insights From a State-of-the-Art Literature Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1