[两种儿童生长标准评价6岁以下儿童营养状况的比较]。

S Wang, Y Mei, Z Y Yang, Q Zhang, R L Li, Y Y Wang, W H Zhao, T Xu
{"title":"[两种儿童生长标准评价6岁以下儿童营养状况的比较]。","authors":"S Wang,&nbsp;Y Mei,&nbsp;Z Y Yang,&nbsp;Q Zhang,&nbsp;R L Li,&nbsp;Y Y Wang,&nbsp;W H Zhao,&nbsp;T Xu","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20230505-00314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To compare the application of China growth standard for children under 7 years of age (China standards) and World Health Organization child growth standards (WHO standards) in evaluating the prevalence of malnutrition in children aged 0-<6 years in China. <b>Methods:</b> The research data came from the national special program for science & technology basic resources investigation of China, named \"2019-2021 survey and application of China's nutrition and health system for children aged 0-18 years\". Multi-stage stratified random sampling was used to recruit 28 districts (regions) in 14 provinces, autonomous regions or municipalities across the country. Children (<i>n</i>=38 848) were physically measured and questionnaires were conducted in the guardians of the children. The indicators of stunting, underweight, wasting, overweight and obesity were evaluated by China standards and WHO standards respectively. Chi-square test was used to comparing the prevalence of each nutritional status between the two standards, as well as the comparison between the two standards by gender and age. <b>Results:</b> Among the 38 848 children, 19 650 were boys (50.6%) and 19 198 were girls (49.4%), 19 480 urban children (50.1%) and 19 368 rural children (49.9%). The stunting, underweight and wasting cases in the study population were 2 090 children (5.4%), 1 354 children (3.5%) and 1 276 children (3.3%) according to the China standards, and 1 474 children (3.8%), 701 children (1.8%) and 824 children (2.1%) according to the WHO standards, respectively; the above rates according to the China standards were slightly higher than those to the WHO standards (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=111.59, 213.14, and 99.99, all <i>P<</i>0.001). The overweight and obesity cases in the study population were 2 186 children (5.6%) and 1 153 children (3.0%) according to the China standards, and 2 210 children (5.7%) and 1 186 children (3.1%) according to the WHO standards, with no statistically significant differences (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=0.14 and 0.48, <i>P=</i>0.709 and 0.488, respectively). Compared to the results based on WHO standards, the China standards showed a lower prevalence of overweight and obesity in boys (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=14.95 and 5.85, <i>P</i><0.001 and =0.016, respectively), and higher prevalence of overweight in girls (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=12.60, <i>P<</i>0.001); but there was no statistically significant differences in girls' obesity prevalence between the two standards (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=2.62, <i>P</i>=0.106). <b>Conclusions:</b> In general, the prevalence of malnutrition among children aged 0-<6 years based on China standards is slightly higher than that on WHO standards. To evaluate the nutritional status of children, it is advisable to select appropriate child growth standards based on work requirements, norms or research objectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":23998,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of pediatrics","volume":"61 8","pages":"700-707"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Comparison of two child growth standards in assessing the nutritional status of children under 6 years of age].\",\"authors\":\"S Wang,&nbsp;Y Mei,&nbsp;Z Y Yang,&nbsp;Q Zhang,&nbsp;R L Li,&nbsp;Y Y Wang,&nbsp;W H Zhao,&nbsp;T Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20230505-00314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To compare the application of China growth standard for children under 7 years of age (China standards) and World Health Organization child growth standards (WHO standards) in evaluating the prevalence of malnutrition in children aged 0-<6 years in China. <b>Methods:</b> The research data came from the national special program for science & technology basic resources investigation of China, named \\\"2019-2021 survey and application of China's nutrition and health system for children aged 0-18 years\\\". Multi-stage stratified random sampling was used to recruit 28 districts (regions) in 14 provinces, autonomous regions or municipalities across the country. Children (<i>n</i>=38 848) were physically measured and questionnaires were conducted in the guardians of the children. The indicators of stunting, underweight, wasting, overweight and obesity were evaluated by China standards and WHO standards respectively. Chi-square test was used to comparing the prevalence of each nutritional status between the two standards, as well as the comparison between the two standards by gender and age. <b>Results:</b> Among the 38 848 children, 19 650 were boys (50.6%) and 19 198 were girls (49.4%), 19 480 urban children (50.1%) and 19 368 rural children (49.9%). The stunting, underweight and wasting cases in the study population were 2 090 children (5.4%), 1 354 children (3.5%) and 1 276 children (3.3%) according to the China standards, and 1 474 children (3.8%), 701 children (1.8%) and 824 children (2.1%) according to the WHO standards, respectively; the above rates according to the China standards were slightly higher than those to the WHO standards (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=111.59, 213.14, and 99.99, all <i>P<</i>0.001). The overweight and obesity cases in the study population were 2 186 children (5.6%) and 1 153 children (3.0%) according to the China standards, and 2 210 children (5.7%) and 1 186 children (3.1%) according to the WHO standards, with no statistically significant differences (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=0.14 and 0.48, <i>P=</i>0.709 and 0.488, respectively). Compared to the results based on WHO standards, the China standards showed a lower prevalence of overweight and obesity in boys (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=14.95 and 5.85, <i>P</i><0.001 and =0.016, respectively), and higher prevalence of overweight in girls (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=12.60, <i>P<</i>0.001); but there was no statistically significant differences in girls' obesity prevalence between the two standards (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=2.62, <i>P</i>=0.106). <b>Conclusions:</b> In general, the prevalence of malnutrition among children aged 0-<6 years based on China standards is slightly higher than that on WHO standards. To evaluate the nutritional status of children, it is advisable to select appropriate child growth standards based on work requirements, norms or research objectives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zhonghua er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"61 8\",\"pages\":\"700-707\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zhonghua er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20230505-00314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20230505-00314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较中国7岁以下儿童生长标准(中国标准)与世界卫生组织儿童生长标准(世卫组织标准)在评价0岁以下儿童营养不良患病率中的应用情况。方法:研究数据来自国家科技基础资源调查专项“2019-2021年中国0-18岁儿童营养卫生体系调查与应用”。采用多阶段分层随机抽样方法,在全国14个省、自治区、直辖市的28个区(区)开展调查。对38 848名儿童进行体格测量,并对其监护人进行问卷调查。发育迟缓、体重不足、消瘦、超重和肥胖指标分别采用中国标准和世界卫生组织标准进行评价。采用卡方检验比较两种标准中各营养状况的患病率,以及两种标准在性别和年龄方面的比较。结果:38 848名儿童中,男孩19 650名(50.6%),女孩19 198名(49.4%),城市儿童19 480名(50.1%),农村儿童19 368名(49.9%)。研究人群发育迟缓2 090例(5.4%),体重不足1 354例(3.5%),消瘦1 276例(3.3%),WHO标准分别为1 474例(3.8%),701例(1.8%),824例(2.1%);按中国标准的上述检出率略高于按世界卫生组织标准的检出率(χ2=111.59、213.14、99.99,p < 0.001)。研究人群中超重和肥胖病例按中国标准分别为2 186例(5.6%)和1 153例(3.0%),按世界卫生组织标准分别为2 210例(5.7%)和1 186例(3.1%),差异均无统计学意义(χ2=0.14、0.48,P=0.709、0.488)。与基于WHO标准的结果相比,中国标准的男孩超重和肥胖患病率较低(χ2=14.95和5.85,Pχ2=12.60, P0.001);两种标准间女生肥胖率差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.62, P=0.106)。结论:总体而言,0- 0岁儿童营养不良患病率较高
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Comparison of two child growth standards in assessing the nutritional status of children under 6 years of age].

Objective: To compare the application of China growth standard for children under 7 years of age (China standards) and World Health Organization child growth standards (WHO standards) in evaluating the prevalence of malnutrition in children aged 0-<6 years in China. Methods: The research data came from the national special program for science & technology basic resources investigation of China, named "2019-2021 survey and application of China's nutrition and health system for children aged 0-18 years". Multi-stage stratified random sampling was used to recruit 28 districts (regions) in 14 provinces, autonomous regions or municipalities across the country. Children (n=38 848) were physically measured and questionnaires were conducted in the guardians of the children. The indicators of stunting, underweight, wasting, overweight and obesity were evaluated by China standards and WHO standards respectively. Chi-square test was used to comparing the prevalence of each nutritional status between the two standards, as well as the comparison between the two standards by gender and age. Results: Among the 38 848 children, 19 650 were boys (50.6%) and 19 198 were girls (49.4%), 19 480 urban children (50.1%) and 19 368 rural children (49.9%). The stunting, underweight and wasting cases in the study population were 2 090 children (5.4%), 1 354 children (3.5%) and 1 276 children (3.3%) according to the China standards, and 1 474 children (3.8%), 701 children (1.8%) and 824 children (2.1%) according to the WHO standards, respectively; the above rates according to the China standards were slightly higher than those to the WHO standards (χ2=111.59, 213.14, and 99.99, all P<0.001). The overweight and obesity cases in the study population were 2 186 children (5.6%) and 1 153 children (3.0%) according to the China standards, and 2 210 children (5.7%) and 1 186 children (3.1%) according to the WHO standards, with no statistically significant differences (χ2=0.14 and 0.48, P=0.709 and 0.488, respectively). Compared to the results based on WHO standards, the China standards showed a lower prevalence of overweight and obesity in boys (χ2=14.95 and 5.85, P<0.001 and =0.016, respectively), and higher prevalence of overweight in girls (χ2=12.60, P<0.001); but there was no statistically significant differences in girls' obesity prevalence between the two standards (χ2=2.62, P=0.106). Conclusions: In general, the prevalence of malnutrition among children aged 0-<6 years based on China standards is slightly higher than that on WHO standards. To evaluate the nutritional status of children, it is advisable to select appropriate child growth standards based on work requirements, norms or research objectives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Two cases of rituximab induced serum sickness in children with nephrotic syndrome]. [Standardized diagnosis and assessment of overweight or obesity in children]. [Advances on treatment of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia with blinatumomab]. [Metagenomic next-generation sequencing-based retrospective investigation of the drug resistance sites of mycoplasma pneumoniae in children]. [Interpretation of treatment of seizures in the neonate: guidelines and consensus-based recommendations-special report from the ILAE Task Force on Neonatal Seizures(2023)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1