评估足中部运动学的基于ct的放射立体分析:与基于标记的放射立体分析的精度比较。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Acta Orthopaedica Pub Date : 2023-07-20 DOI:10.2340/17453674.2023.16905
Magnus Poulsen, Are H Stødle, Lars Nordsletten, Stephan M Röhrl
{"title":"评估足中部运动学的基于ct的放射立体分析:与基于标记的放射立体分析的精度比较。","authors":"Magnus Poulsen,&nbsp;Are H Stødle,&nbsp;Lars Nordsletten,&nbsp;Stephan M Röhrl","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2023.16905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>3-dimensional midfoot motion is hard to evaluate in clinical practice. We present a new computed tomography (CT)-based radiostereometric analysis (CT-RSA) technique to examine in vivo midfoot kinematics during single-leg stance and compare it with marker-based radiostereometry (RSA).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>8 patients were examined with bilateral non- and full-weight-bearing CT images of the midfoot. 1st tarsometatarsal motion was analyzed using a surface-registration technique (CT-RSA). As all patients had unilateral tantalum markers in the 1st cuneiform (C1) and 1st metatarsal (M1), comparison of precision with markerbased RSA was performed. CT-RSA precision was evaluated with surface registration of both C1-M1 bone and C1-M1 tantalum markers, while RSA precision was determined with C1-M1 markers only. Additionally, to remove motion bias, we evaluated intrasegmental CT-RSA precision by comparing proximal with distal part of M1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under physical load, the primary movement for the 1st tarsometatarsal joint was M1 dorsiflexion (mean 1.4°), adduction (mean 1.4°), and dorsal translation (mean 1.1 mm). CT-RSA precision, using surface bone or markers, was in the range of 0.3-0.7 mm for translation and 0.6-1.6° for rotation. In comparison, RSA precision was in the range of 0.4-0.9 mm for translation and 1.0-1.7° for rotation. Finally, intrasegmental CT-RSA precision was in the range of 0.1-0.2 mm for translation and 0.4-0.5° for rotation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CT-RSA is a valid and precise, non-invasive method to measure midfoot kinematics when compared with conventional RSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"94 ","pages":"366-372"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/79/5b/ActaO-94-16905.PMC10370411.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CT-based radiostereometric analysis for assessing midfoot kinematics: precision compared with marker-based radiostereometry.\",\"authors\":\"Magnus Poulsen,&nbsp;Are H Stødle,&nbsp;Lars Nordsletten,&nbsp;Stephan M Röhrl\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/17453674.2023.16905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>3-dimensional midfoot motion is hard to evaluate in clinical practice. We present a new computed tomography (CT)-based radiostereometric analysis (CT-RSA) technique to examine in vivo midfoot kinematics during single-leg stance and compare it with marker-based radiostereometry (RSA).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>8 patients were examined with bilateral non- and full-weight-bearing CT images of the midfoot. 1st tarsometatarsal motion was analyzed using a surface-registration technique (CT-RSA). As all patients had unilateral tantalum markers in the 1st cuneiform (C1) and 1st metatarsal (M1), comparison of precision with markerbased RSA was performed. CT-RSA precision was evaluated with surface registration of both C1-M1 bone and C1-M1 tantalum markers, while RSA precision was determined with C1-M1 markers only. Additionally, to remove motion bias, we evaluated intrasegmental CT-RSA precision by comparing proximal with distal part of M1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under physical load, the primary movement for the 1st tarsometatarsal joint was M1 dorsiflexion (mean 1.4°), adduction (mean 1.4°), and dorsal translation (mean 1.1 mm). CT-RSA precision, using surface bone or markers, was in the range of 0.3-0.7 mm for translation and 0.6-1.6° for rotation. In comparison, RSA precision was in the range of 0.4-0.9 mm for translation and 1.0-1.7° for rotation. Finally, intrasegmental CT-RSA precision was in the range of 0.1-0.2 mm for translation and 0.4-0.5° for rotation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CT-RSA is a valid and precise, non-invasive method to measure midfoot kinematics when compared with conventional RSA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"volume\":\"94 \",\"pages\":\"366-372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/79/5b/ActaO-94-16905.PMC10370411.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Orthopaedica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.16905\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.16905","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:足中部三维运动在临床实践中难以评价。我们提出了一种新的基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的放射立体分析(CT-RSA)技术来检查单腿站立时的体内足中部运动学,并将其与基于标记的放射立体分析(RSA)进行比较。患者与方法:对8例患者行双侧足中部非负重和全负重CT检查。使用表面配准技术(CT-RSA)分析第一跗跖骨运动。由于所有患者在第一楔形骨(C1)和第一跖骨(M1)均有单侧钽标记物,因此与基于标记物的RSA进行精度比较。CT-RSA精度通过C1-M1骨和C1-M1钽标记物的表面配准来评估,而RSA精度仅通过C1-M1标记物来确定。此外,为了消除运动偏差,我们通过比较M1的近端和远端来评估节段内CT-RSA精度。结果:在物理负荷下,第一跗跖关节的主要运动是M1背屈(平均1.4°)、内收(平均1.4°)和背移(平均1.1 mm)。CT-RSA精度,使用表面骨或标记,平移在0.3-0.7 mm范围内,旋转0.6-1.6°。相比之下,平移时的RSA精度为0.4-0.9 mm,旋转时的RSA精度为1.0-1.7°。最后,CT-RSA段内平移精度为0.1-0.2 mm,旋转精度为0.4-0.5°。结论:CT-RSA与传统的RSA相比,是一种有效、精确、无创的测量中足部运动学的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CT-based radiostereometric analysis for assessing midfoot kinematics: precision compared with marker-based radiostereometry.

Background and purpose: 3-dimensional midfoot motion is hard to evaluate in clinical practice. We present a new computed tomography (CT)-based radiostereometric analysis (CT-RSA) technique to examine in vivo midfoot kinematics during single-leg stance and compare it with marker-based radiostereometry (RSA).

Patients and methods: 8 patients were examined with bilateral non- and full-weight-bearing CT images of the midfoot. 1st tarsometatarsal motion was analyzed using a surface-registration technique (CT-RSA). As all patients had unilateral tantalum markers in the 1st cuneiform (C1) and 1st metatarsal (M1), comparison of precision with markerbased RSA was performed. CT-RSA precision was evaluated with surface registration of both C1-M1 bone and C1-M1 tantalum markers, while RSA precision was determined with C1-M1 markers only. Additionally, to remove motion bias, we evaluated intrasegmental CT-RSA precision by comparing proximal with distal part of M1.

Results: Under physical load, the primary movement for the 1st tarsometatarsal joint was M1 dorsiflexion (mean 1.4°), adduction (mean 1.4°), and dorsal translation (mean 1.1 mm). CT-RSA precision, using surface bone or markers, was in the range of 0.3-0.7 mm for translation and 0.6-1.6° for rotation. In comparison, RSA precision was in the range of 0.4-0.9 mm for translation and 1.0-1.7° for rotation. Finally, intrasegmental CT-RSA precision was in the range of 0.1-0.2 mm for translation and 0.4-0.5° for rotation.

Conclusion: CT-RSA is a valid and precise, non-invasive method to measure midfoot kinematics when compared with conventional RSA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Orthopaedica
Acta Orthopaedica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
105
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.
期刊最新文献
Acute treatment of elderly patients with acetabular fractures by open reduction, internal fixation, and total hip arthroplasty: a 1-10-year follow-up of 48 patients. Incidence and risk factors of adverse events after distal radius fracture fixation with volar locking plates: retrospective analysis of 2,790 cases. The completeness of national hip and knee replacement registers. Can KOOS-PS be replaced with a simple anchor question in patients after total knee arthroplasty?: an agreement study of 2,478 primary surgeries. Erratum: Regional variation in low-value musculoskeletal surgery: a nationwide study from the Finnish Care Register.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1