种族/民族对美国FRAX计算和治疗资格的影响:一项基于登记的研究。

IF 5.1 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Bone and Mineral Research Pub Date : 2023-08-07 DOI:10.1002/jbmr.4896
William D Leslie, for the ASBMR Task Force on Clinical Algorithms for Fracture Risk
{"title":"种族/民族对美国FRAX计算和治疗资格的影响:一项基于登记的研究。","authors":"William D Leslie,&nbsp;for the ASBMR Task Force on Clinical Algorithms for Fracture Risk","doi":"10.1002/jbmr.4896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Since 2008. the United States has had four race/ethnic fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) calculators: White (“Caucasian”), Black, Asian, and Hispanic. The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research Task Force on Clinical Algorithms for Fracture Risk has been examining the implications of retaining race/ethnicity in the US FRAX calculators. To inform the Task Force, we computed FRAX scores according to each US calculator in 114,942 White, 485 Black, and 2816 Asian women (self-reported race/ethnicity) aged 50 years and older. We estimated treatment qualification based upon FRAX thresholds (3% for hip fracture, 20% for major osteoporotic fracture [MOF]). Finally, we examined measures for a hypothetical population-based FRAX calculator derived as the weighted mean for the US population based upon US Census Bureau statistics. With identical inputs, the highest FRAX measurements were found with the White FRAX calculator, lowest measurements with the Black calculator, and intermediate measurements for the Asian and Hispanic calculators. The percentage of women with FRAX scores exceeding the hip fracture treatment threshold was 32.0% for White, 1.9% for Black, and 19.7% for Asian women; the MOF treatment threshold was exceeded for 14.9% of White, 0.0% of Black, and 3.5% of Asian women. Disparities in treatment qualification were reduced after considering additional criteria (fracture history and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [DXA] <i>T</i>-score −2.5 or lower). When fracture risk was recalculated for non-White women using the White FRAX calculator, mean values for Asian women slightly exceeded those for White women but for Black women remained substantially below those for White women. When using a single population–based FRAX calculator, the mean probability of fracture and treatment qualification increased for non-White women across the age range. In summary, use of a single population–based FRAX calculator, rather than existing US race/ethnic FRAX calculators, will reduce differences in treatment qualification and may ultimately enhance equity and access to osteoporosis treatment. © 2023 The Authors. <i>Journal of Bone and Mineral Research</i> published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).</p>","PeriodicalId":185,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Research","volume":"38 12","pages":"1742-1748"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jbmr.4896","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Race/Ethnicity on United States FRAX Calculations and Treatment Qualification: A Registry-Based Study\",\"authors\":\"William D Leslie,&nbsp;for the ASBMR Task Force on Clinical Algorithms for Fracture Risk\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jbmr.4896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Since 2008. the United States has had four race/ethnic fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) calculators: White (“Caucasian”), Black, Asian, and Hispanic. The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research Task Force on Clinical Algorithms for Fracture Risk has been examining the implications of retaining race/ethnicity in the US FRAX calculators. To inform the Task Force, we computed FRAX scores according to each US calculator in 114,942 White, 485 Black, and 2816 Asian women (self-reported race/ethnicity) aged 50 years and older. We estimated treatment qualification based upon FRAX thresholds (3% for hip fracture, 20% for major osteoporotic fracture [MOF]). Finally, we examined measures for a hypothetical population-based FRAX calculator derived as the weighted mean for the US population based upon US Census Bureau statistics. With identical inputs, the highest FRAX measurements were found with the White FRAX calculator, lowest measurements with the Black calculator, and intermediate measurements for the Asian and Hispanic calculators. The percentage of women with FRAX scores exceeding the hip fracture treatment threshold was 32.0% for White, 1.9% for Black, and 19.7% for Asian women; the MOF treatment threshold was exceeded for 14.9% of White, 0.0% of Black, and 3.5% of Asian women. Disparities in treatment qualification were reduced after considering additional criteria (fracture history and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [DXA] <i>T</i>-score −2.5 or lower). When fracture risk was recalculated for non-White women using the White FRAX calculator, mean values for Asian women slightly exceeded those for White women but for Black women remained substantially below those for White women. When using a single population–based FRAX calculator, the mean probability of fracture and treatment qualification increased for non-White women across the age range. In summary, use of a single population–based FRAX calculator, rather than existing US race/ethnic FRAX calculators, will reduce differences in treatment qualification and may ultimately enhance equity and access to osteoporosis treatment. © 2023 The Authors. <i>Journal of Bone and Mineral Research</i> published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bone and Mineral Research\",\"volume\":\"38 12\",\"pages\":\"1742-1748\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jbmr.4896\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bone and Mineral Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbmr.4896\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbmr.4896","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自2008年以来。美国有四种种族/民族骨折风险评估工具(FRAX)计算器:白人(“高加索人”)、黑人、亚洲人和西班牙人。美国骨与矿物学会骨折风险临床算法研究工作组一直在研究美国FRAX计算器中保留种族/民族的影响。为了向工作组提供信息,我们根据每个美国计算器计算了年龄在50岁及以上的114,942名白人、485名黑人和2816名亚洲女性(自我报告的种族/民族)的FRAX分数。我们根据FRAX阈值(髋部骨折为3%,严重骨质疏松性骨折[MOF]为20%)估计治疗资格。最后,我们研究了一个假设的基于人口的FRAX计算器的措施,该计算器基于美国人口普查局的统计数据,作为美国人口的加权平均值。在输入相同的情况下,白人计算器的FRAX测量值最高,黑人计算器的FRAX测量值最低,亚裔和西班牙裔计算器的FRAX测量值居中。FRAX评分超过髋部骨折治疗阈值的女性比例白人为32.0%,黑人为1.9%,亚洲女性为19.7%;超过MOF治疗阈值的白人女性为14.9%,黑人女性为0.0%,亚洲女性为3.5%。在考虑了额外的标准(骨折史和双能x线吸收仪[DXA] t评分-2.5或更低)后,减少了治疗资格的差异。当使用White FRAX计算器重新计算非白人女性的骨折风险时,亚洲女性的平均值略高于白人女性,但黑人女性的平均值仍大大低于白人女性。当使用基于单一人群的FRAX计算器时,非白人女性在整个年龄范围内骨折和治疗资格的平均概率增加。总之,使用单一的基于人群的FRAX计算器,而不是现有的美国种族/民族FRAX计算器,将减少治疗资格的差异,并可能最终提高骨质疏松症治疗的公平性和可及性。©2023作者。由Wiley期刊有限责任公司代表美国骨与矿物研究协会(ASBMR)出版的骨与矿物研究杂志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Race/Ethnicity on United States FRAX Calculations and Treatment Qualification: A Registry-Based Study

Since 2008. the United States has had four race/ethnic fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) calculators: White (“Caucasian”), Black, Asian, and Hispanic. The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research Task Force on Clinical Algorithms for Fracture Risk has been examining the implications of retaining race/ethnicity in the US FRAX calculators. To inform the Task Force, we computed FRAX scores according to each US calculator in 114,942 White, 485 Black, and 2816 Asian women (self-reported race/ethnicity) aged 50 years and older. We estimated treatment qualification based upon FRAX thresholds (3% for hip fracture, 20% for major osteoporotic fracture [MOF]). Finally, we examined measures for a hypothetical population-based FRAX calculator derived as the weighted mean for the US population based upon US Census Bureau statistics. With identical inputs, the highest FRAX measurements were found with the White FRAX calculator, lowest measurements with the Black calculator, and intermediate measurements for the Asian and Hispanic calculators. The percentage of women with FRAX scores exceeding the hip fracture treatment threshold was 32.0% for White, 1.9% for Black, and 19.7% for Asian women; the MOF treatment threshold was exceeded for 14.9% of White, 0.0% of Black, and 3.5% of Asian women. Disparities in treatment qualification were reduced after considering additional criteria (fracture history and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [DXA] T-score −2.5 or lower). When fracture risk was recalculated for non-White women using the White FRAX calculator, mean values for Asian women slightly exceeded those for White women but for Black women remained substantially below those for White women. When using a single population–based FRAX calculator, the mean probability of fracture and treatment qualification increased for non-White women across the age range. In summary, use of a single population–based FRAX calculator, rather than existing US race/ethnic FRAX calculators, will reduce differences in treatment qualification and may ultimately enhance equity and access to osteoporosis treatment. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
257
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (JBMR) publishes highly impactful original manuscripts, reviews, and special articles on basic, translational and clinical investigations relevant to the musculoskeletal system and mineral metabolism. Specifically, the journal is interested in original research on the biology and physiology of skeletal tissues, interdisciplinary research spanning the musculoskeletal and other systems, including but not limited to immunology, hematology, energy metabolism, cancer biology, and neurology, and systems biology topics using large scale “-omics” approaches. The journal welcomes clinical research on the pathophysiology, treatment and prevention of osteoporosis and fractures, as well as sarcopenia, disorders of bone and mineral metabolism, and rare or genetically determined bone diseases.
期刊最新文献
Expression of Concern: CYP4A22 loss-of-function causes a new type of vitamin D-dependent rickets (VDDR1C). A new Col1a1 conditional knock-in mouse model to study osteogenesis imperfecta. Bmpr1aa modulates the severity of the skeletal phenotype in an fkbp10-deficient Bruck syndrome zebrafish model. The role of vitamin D metabolism in regulating bone turnover in adolescents with perinatally-acquired HIV in southern Africa: a cross-sectional study in Zimbabwe and Zambia. Thrombopoietic agents enhance bone healing in mice, rats, and pigs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1