胸大肌修复术后的长期复发率和患者满意度

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS European Journal of Pediatric Surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-14 DOI:10.1055/a-2127-6133
Nelimar Cruz-Centeno, James A Fraser, Shai Stewart, Derek R Marlor, Tolulope A Oyetunji, Shawn D St Peter
{"title":"胸大肌修复术后的长期复发率和患者满意度","authors":"Nelimar Cruz-Centeno, James A Fraser, Shai Stewart, Derek R Marlor, Tolulope A Oyetunji, Shawn D St Peter","doi":"10.1055/a-2127-6133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Pectus excavatum deformities are usually repaired with a minimally invasive approach in which a metal bar is used to correct the chest wall abnormality. We aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes and patient satisfaction after surgical correction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Patients who underwent pectus excavatum repair and subsequent bar removal at a single tertiary care center from January 2000 to December 2020 were identified. A retrospective chart review was performed, and a telephone survey was conducted to evaluate perceived inward chest movement, need for surgeon reevaluation, surgical reintervention, and overall satisfaction. Data are presented as medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) and frequencies with percentages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 583 patients were included. The survey response rate was 26.2% (<i>n</i> = 153). The respondents were predominantly male (80.4%, <i>n</i> = 123) with a median age at surgical correction of 14.9 years (IQR 12.9, 16.1) and a median Haller index (HI) of 3.8 (IQR 3.4, 4.5). Median time to bar removal was 2.9 years (IQR 2.5, 3.0) with a median age at removal of 17.7 years (IQR 15.5, 19.0). Median time from surgery to survey follow-up was 9.6 years (IRQ 5.0, 11.4) with respondents having a median age at follow-up of 25 years (IQR 22.0, 28.4). The satisfaction rate was 96.7% (<i>n</i> = 148) with a reintervention rate of 2.0% (<i>n</i> = 3). The perceived inward chest movement was 30.7% (<i>n</i> = 47) with 12.8% (<i>n</i> = 6) of those requesting surgical reevaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> There is a high level of satisfaction many years after correction of pectus excavatum and bar removal. With the advent of cryoablative therapy since 2017, patient satisfaction improved by experience of less postoperative pain. Reintervention rate is low despite some patients reporting a perceived chest wall inward movement.</p>","PeriodicalId":56316,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Recurrence Rates and Patient Satisfaction after Repair of Pectus Excavatum.\",\"authors\":\"Nelimar Cruz-Centeno, James A Fraser, Shai Stewart, Derek R Marlor, Tolulope A Oyetunji, Shawn D St Peter\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2127-6133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Pectus excavatum deformities are usually repaired with a minimally invasive approach in which a metal bar is used to correct the chest wall abnormality. We aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes and patient satisfaction after surgical correction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Patients who underwent pectus excavatum repair and subsequent bar removal at a single tertiary care center from January 2000 to December 2020 were identified. A retrospective chart review was performed, and a telephone survey was conducted to evaluate perceived inward chest movement, need for surgeon reevaluation, surgical reintervention, and overall satisfaction. Data are presented as medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) and frequencies with percentages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 583 patients were included. The survey response rate was 26.2% (<i>n</i> = 153). The respondents were predominantly male (80.4%, <i>n</i> = 123) with a median age at surgical correction of 14.9 years (IQR 12.9, 16.1) and a median Haller index (HI) of 3.8 (IQR 3.4, 4.5). Median time to bar removal was 2.9 years (IQR 2.5, 3.0) with a median age at removal of 17.7 years (IQR 15.5, 19.0). Median time from surgery to survey follow-up was 9.6 years (IRQ 5.0, 11.4) with respondents having a median age at follow-up of 25 years (IQR 22.0, 28.4). The satisfaction rate was 96.7% (<i>n</i> = 148) with a reintervention rate of 2.0% (<i>n</i> = 3). The perceived inward chest movement was 30.7% (<i>n</i> = 47) with 12.8% (<i>n</i> = 6) of those requesting surgical reevaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> There is a high level of satisfaction many years after correction of pectus excavatum and bar removal. With the advent of cryoablative therapy since 2017, patient satisfaction improved by experience of less postoperative pain. Reintervention rate is low despite some patients reporting a perceived chest wall inward movement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2127-6133\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2127-6133","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:通常采用微创方法修复胸大肌畸形,用金属棒矫正胸壁畸形。我们旨在评估手术矫正后的长期疗效和患者满意度:方法:确定了 2000 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间在一家三级医疗中心接受了乳突修补术并随后移除金属棒的患者。进行了回顾性病历审查,并进行了电话调查,以评估感知到的胸廓内移、外科医生重新评估的需要、手术再干预和总体满意度。数据以中位数和四分位数间距 (IQR) 以及频率和百分比表示:共纳入 583 名患者。调查回复率为 26.2%(n = 153)。受访者以男性为主(80.4%,n = 123),手术矫正时的中位年龄为 14.9 岁(IQR 12.9,16.1),中位哈勒指数(HI)为 3.8(IQR 3.4,4.5)。移除横杠的中位时间为 2.9 年(IQR 2.5,3.0),移除时的中位年龄为 17.7 岁(IQR 15.5,19.0)。从手术到调查随访的中位时间为 9.6 年(IRQ 5.0,11.4),受访者随访时的中位年龄为 25 岁(IQR 22.0,28.4)。满意率为 96.7%(n = 148),再次干预率为 2.0%(n = 3)。胸廓内移感知率为 30.7%(n = 47),其中 12.8%(n = 6)的患者要求进行手术再评估:结论:胸廓外翻矫正术和横杠移除术后多年的满意度很高。自2017年低温消融疗法问世以来,患者的满意度因术后疼痛减轻而有所提高。尽管一些患者报告胸壁有向内移动的感觉,但再次干预率很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-Term Recurrence Rates and Patient Satisfaction after Repair of Pectus Excavatum.

Background:  Pectus excavatum deformities are usually repaired with a minimally invasive approach in which a metal bar is used to correct the chest wall abnormality. We aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes and patient satisfaction after surgical correction.

Methods:  Patients who underwent pectus excavatum repair and subsequent bar removal at a single tertiary care center from January 2000 to December 2020 were identified. A retrospective chart review was performed, and a telephone survey was conducted to evaluate perceived inward chest movement, need for surgeon reevaluation, surgical reintervention, and overall satisfaction. Data are presented as medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) and frequencies with percentages.

Results:  A total of 583 patients were included. The survey response rate was 26.2% (n = 153). The respondents were predominantly male (80.4%, n = 123) with a median age at surgical correction of 14.9 years (IQR 12.9, 16.1) and a median Haller index (HI) of 3.8 (IQR 3.4, 4.5). Median time to bar removal was 2.9 years (IQR 2.5, 3.0) with a median age at removal of 17.7 years (IQR 15.5, 19.0). Median time from surgery to survey follow-up was 9.6 years (IRQ 5.0, 11.4) with respondents having a median age at follow-up of 25 years (IQR 22.0, 28.4). The satisfaction rate was 96.7% (n = 148) with a reintervention rate of 2.0% (n = 3). The perceived inward chest movement was 30.7% (n = 47) with 12.8% (n = 6) of those requesting surgical reevaluation.

Conclusion:  There is a high level of satisfaction many years after correction of pectus excavatum and bar removal. With the advent of cryoablative therapy since 2017, patient satisfaction improved by experience of less postoperative pain. Reintervention rate is low despite some patients reporting a perceived chest wall inward movement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This broad-based international journal updates you on vital developments in pediatric surgery through original articles, abstracts of the literature, and meeting announcements. You will find state-of-the-art information on: abdominal and thoracic surgery neurosurgery urology gynecology oncology orthopaedics traumatology anesthesiology child pathology embryology morphology Written by surgeons, physicians, anesthesiologists, radiologists, and others involved in the surgical care of neonates, infants, and children, the EJPS is an indispensable resource for all specialists.
期刊最新文献
Preliminary Experience with Continuous Submucosal Anastomosis in Small-Diameter Hepaticojejunostomy during Single-Port Laparoscopic Choledochal Cyst Surgery in Children. The Irish Experience with Sacrococcygeal Teratomas: Are Type IV Lesions More Common than We Think? Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity in Children with Esophageal Atresia. Long-Term Functional Outcomes and Multidisciplinary Management after Ileorectal Duhamel Pull-Through for Total Colonic Aganglionosis-20-Year Experience in a Tertiary Surgical Center. Antegrade Continence Enema Alone for the Management of Functional Constipation and Segmental Colonic Dysmotility (ACE-FC): A Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1