模拟训练对反思性实践的影响。

IF 1.1 Q2 Social Sciences BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning Pub Date : 2021-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-26 DOI:10.1136/bmjstel-2021-000870
John A Aitken, Elisa M Torres, Seth A Kaplan, Deborah DiazGranados, Lillian Su, Sarah Henrickson Parker
{"title":"模拟训练对反思性实践的影响。","authors":"John A Aitken, Elisa M Torres, Seth A Kaplan, Deborah DiazGranados, Lillian Su, Sarah Henrickson Parker","doi":"10.1136/bmjstel-2021-000870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simulation-based training (SBT) is often evaluated based on the transfer of specific knowledge and skills. In contrast, the degree to which reflective practice is inculcated by SBT is rarely considered. Because reflection is a pillar of adult learning theories, we sought to examine the degree to which participation in SBT was associated with increased reflective practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eighty one healthcare professionals completed a survey which included the number of SBTs they participated in during the past two years, content- and administrative-related features of those SBTs, and a key aspect of reflective practice (i.e., self-appraisal).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of SBTs healthcare professionals participated in during the past two years was positively associated with reflective self-appraisal. This relationship was not moderated by the inclusion of reflection components in SBTs nor by the voluntary/mandatory nature of participation in SBTs. Furthermore, the facilitator was ranked as the most important feature of the overall learning experience in SBTs. Also, no significant differences were found between the number of technical skills-based and non-technical skills-based SBTs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings demonstrate the importance (of evaluating) SBTs for facilitating reflective learning mindsets that healthcare practitioners can apply beyond the specific skills trained by SBTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":44757,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8411838/pdf/bmjstel-2021-000870.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Simulation-based Training on Reflective Practice.\",\"authors\":\"John A Aitken, Elisa M Torres, Seth A Kaplan, Deborah DiazGranados, Lillian Su, Sarah Henrickson Parker\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjstel-2021-000870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simulation-based training (SBT) is often evaluated based on the transfer of specific knowledge and skills. In contrast, the degree to which reflective practice is inculcated by SBT is rarely considered. Because reflection is a pillar of adult learning theories, we sought to examine the degree to which participation in SBT was associated with increased reflective practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eighty one healthcare professionals completed a survey which included the number of SBTs they participated in during the past two years, content- and administrative-related features of those SBTs, and a key aspect of reflective practice (i.e., self-appraisal).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of SBTs healthcare professionals participated in during the past two years was positively associated with reflective self-appraisal. This relationship was not moderated by the inclusion of reflection components in SBTs nor by the voluntary/mandatory nature of participation in SBTs. Furthermore, the facilitator was ranked as the most important feature of the overall learning experience in SBTs. Also, no significant differences were found between the number of technical skills-based and non-technical skills-based SBTs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings demonstrate the importance (of evaluating) SBTs for facilitating reflective learning mindsets that healthcare practitioners can apply beyond the specific skills trained by SBTs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8411838/pdf/bmjstel-2021-000870.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2021-000870\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2021-000870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:模拟培训(SBT)通常根据特定知识和技能的传授情况进行评估。与此相反,人们很少考虑 SBT 在多大程度上灌输了反思性实践。由于反思是成人学习理论的支柱,因此我们试图研究参与 SBT 与反思性实践增加的关联程度:方法:81 名医疗保健专业人员完成了一项调查,内容包括他们在过去两年中参加的 SBT 的数量、这些 SBT 的内容和管理相关特征,以及反思性实践的一个关键方面(即自我评价):结果:医护人员在过去两年中参与的 SBT 数量与反思性自我评估呈正相关。这种关系并不因 SBT 是否包含反思内容或参与 SBT 的自愿/强制性质而调节。此外,在 SBTs 的整体学习体验中,主持人被列为最重要的特征。此外,基于技术技能的 SBT 和非基于技术技能的 SBT 在数量上没有明显差异:这些研究结果表明,SBT(评估)对于促进反思性学习心态非常重要,医护人员可以将其应用到 SBT 培训的特定技能之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of Simulation-based Training on Reflective Practice.

Background: Simulation-based training (SBT) is often evaluated based on the transfer of specific knowledge and skills. In contrast, the degree to which reflective practice is inculcated by SBT is rarely considered. Because reflection is a pillar of adult learning theories, we sought to examine the degree to which participation in SBT was associated with increased reflective practice.

Method: Eighty one healthcare professionals completed a survey which included the number of SBTs they participated in during the past two years, content- and administrative-related features of those SBTs, and a key aspect of reflective practice (i.e., self-appraisal).

Results: The number of SBTs healthcare professionals participated in during the past two years was positively associated with reflective self-appraisal. This relationship was not moderated by the inclusion of reflection components in SBTs nor by the voluntary/mandatory nature of participation in SBTs. Furthermore, the facilitator was ranked as the most important feature of the overall learning experience in SBTs. Also, no significant differences were found between the number of technical skills-based and non-technical skills-based SBTs.

Conclusion: These findings demonstrate the importance (of evaluating) SBTs for facilitating reflective learning mindsets that healthcare practitioners can apply beyond the specific skills trained by SBTs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of Simulation-based Training on Reflective Practice. Virtual tabletop simulations for primary care pandemic preparedness and response. Developing a simulation programme to train airway management during the COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary-level hospital. Interprofessional teamwork for managing medical deterioration in pregnancy: what contributes to good clinical performance in simulated practice? Age suit simulation replicates in healthy young adults the functional challenges to balance experienced by older adults: an observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1