在牙管预备过程中使用次氯酸钠与依替膦酸混合液会增加碎屑挤出量

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Australian Endodontic Journal Pub Date : 2023-08-11 DOI:10.1111/aej.12788
Talita Tartari DDS, MSc, PhD, Brenda Stefhany Wilchenski DDS, Luana Arantes de Souza Lima DDS, Rodrigo Ricci Vivan DDS, MSc, PhD, Vasudev Ballal BDS, MDS, PhD, Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte DDS, MSc, PhD
{"title":"在牙管预备过程中使用次氯酸钠与依替膦酸混合液会增加碎屑挤出量","authors":"Talita Tartari DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Brenda Stefhany Wilchenski DDS,&nbsp;Luana Arantes de Souza Lima DDS,&nbsp;Rodrigo Ricci Vivan DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Vasudev Ballal BDS, MDS, PhD,&nbsp;Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte DDS, MSc, PhD","doi":"10.1111/aej.12788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of different irrigation protocols on debris extrusion. Single-rooted teeth were distributed into groups based on the irrigation protocols (<i>n</i> = 40): 2.5% NaOCl (biomechanical preparation: 20 mL and final irrigation: 5 mL); 2.5% NaOCl (biomechanical preparation: 20 mL) + 17% EDTA (final irrigation: 2 mL) + 2.5% NaOCl (final irrigation: 3 mL); and a mixture of 5% NaOCl +18% HEDP (biomechanical preparation: 20 mL and final irrigation: 5 mL). The canals were prepared using a reciprocating instrument size 40/0.06. For final irrigation, the groups were reassigned based on the agitation methods (<i>n</i> = 10): (a) no agitation; (b) ultrasonic; (c) sonic; and (d) continuous rotation. The control group (<i>n</i> = 10) received saline solution without agitation. The amount of debris extruded was measured by weight and analysed using One-way ANOVA (<i>α</i> &lt; 0.05). The subgroups treated with NaOCl + HEDP mixture showed a significantly higher amount of extruded debris (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), while there was no difference among agitation methods in all groups (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05).</p>","PeriodicalId":55581,"journal":{"name":"Australian Endodontic Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of sodium hypochlorite mixed with etidronic acid during canal preparation increases debris extrusion\",\"authors\":\"Talita Tartari DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Brenda Stefhany Wilchenski DDS,&nbsp;Luana Arantes de Souza Lima DDS,&nbsp;Rodrigo Ricci Vivan DDS, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Vasudev Ballal BDS, MDS, PhD,&nbsp;Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte DDS, MSc, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aej.12788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of different irrigation protocols on debris extrusion. Single-rooted teeth were distributed into groups based on the irrigation protocols (<i>n</i> = 40): 2.5% NaOCl (biomechanical preparation: 20 mL and final irrigation: 5 mL); 2.5% NaOCl (biomechanical preparation: 20 mL) + 17% EDTA (final irrigation: 2 mL) + 2.5% NaOCl (final irrigation: 3 mL); and a mixture of 5% NaOCl +18% HEDP (biomechanical preparation: 20 mL and final irrigation: 5 mL). The canals were prepared using a reciprocating instrument size 40/0.06. For final irrigation, the groups were reassigned based on the agitation methods (<i>n</i> = 10): (a) no agitation; (b) ultrasonic; (c) sonic; and (d) continuous rotation. The control group (<i>n</i> = 10) received saline solution without agitation. The amount of debris extruded was measured by weight and analysed using One-way ANOVA (<i>α</i> &lt; 0.05). The subgroups treated with NaOCl + HEDP mixture showed a significantly higher amount of extruded debris (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), while there was no difference among agitation methods in all groups (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Endodontic Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Endodontic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aej.12788\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aej.12788","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较不同冲洗方案对碎屑挤出的影响。根据灌洗方案将单根牙分为几组(n = 40):2.5%NaOCl(生物力学制备:20 mL,最终冲洗:5 mL);2.5%NaOCl(生物力学制备:20 mL)+17%EDTA(最终冲洗:2 mL)+2.5%NaOCl(最终冲洗:3 mL);5%NaOCl+18%HEDP混合液(生物力学制备:20 mL,最终冲洗:5 mL)。使用 40/0.06 号往复式器械制备牙管。最后冲洗时,根据搅拌方法重新分配各组(n = 10):(a) 无搅拌;(b) 超声波;(c) 声波;(d) 连续旋转。对照组(n = 10)接受无搅拌的生理盐水。挤出的碎片量按重量计算,并采用单因素方差分析(α < 0.05)。用 NaOCl + HEDP 混合物处理的亚组挤出的碎片量明显较多(p < 0.05),而所有组的搅拌方法没有差异(p > 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The use of sodium hypochlorite mixed with etidronic acid during canal preparation increases debris extrusion

The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of different irrigation protocols on debris extrusion. Single-rooted teeth were distributed into groups based on the irrigation protocols (n = 40): 2.5% NaOCl (biomechanical preparation: 20 mL and final irrigation: 5 mL); 2.5% NaOCl (biomechanical preparation: 20 mL) + 17% EDTA (final irrigation: 2 mL) + 2.5% NaOCl (final irrigation: 3 mL); and a mixture of 5% NaOCl +18% HEDP (biomechanical preparation: 20 mL and final irrigation: 5 mL). The canals were prepared using a reciprocating instrument size 40/0.06. For final irrigation, the groups were reassigned based on the agitation methods (n = 10): (a) no agitation; (b) ultrasonic; (c) sonic; and (d) continuous rotation. The control group (n = 10) received saline solution without agitation. The amount of debris extruded was measured by weight and analysed using One-way ANOVA (α < 0.05). The subgroups treated with NaOCl + HEDP mixture showed a significantly higher amount of extruded debris (p < 0.05), while there was no difference among agitation methods in all groups (p > 0.05).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Endodontic Journal
Australian Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
99
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Endodontic Journal provides a forum for communication in the different fields that encompass endodontics for all specialists and dentists with an interest in the morphology, physiology, and pathology of the human tooth, in particular the dental pulp, root and peri-radicular tissues. The Journal features regular clinical updates, research reports and case reports from authors worldwide, and also publishes meeting abstracts, society news and historical endodontic glimpses. The Australian Endodontic Journal is a publication for dentists in general and specialist practice devoted solely to endodontics. It aims to promote communication in the different fields that encompass endodontics for those dentists who have a special interest in endodontics.
期刊最新文献
Identification of oxidative stress biomarkers in apical periodontitis: A scoping review with bibliometric analysis Permanent tooth avulsions: A retrospective analysis of the demographics and aetiology of cases at a tertiary hospital in Sydney, Australia Micro‐computed tomography evaluation of minimally invasive root canal preparation in 3D‐printed C‐shaped canal Survival evaluation of surgical extrusion for the management of complicated crown‐root fractured maxillary incisors: A clinical study Sharing endodontic research on social media platforms: Is it effective? A 10-year timeline analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1