Mayara Karoline Silva Lacerda, Maria Aparecida Vieira, Fabrine Costa Marques, Juliana Pereira Alves, Matheus Mendes Pereira, Andreia Cristina Feitosa do Carmo, Mark Napoli Costa, Antônio Prates Caldeira, Cristina Andrade Sampaio
{"title":"巴西心理健康背景下提供者调查的心理测量特性：一项验证研究。","authors":"Mayara Karoline Silva Lacerda, Maria Aparecida Vieira, Fabrine Costa Marques, Juliana Pereira Alves, Matheus Mendes Pereira, Andreia Cristina Feitosa do Carmo, Mark Napoli Costa, Antônio Prates Caldeira, Cristina Andrade Sampaio","doi":"10.1590/1516-3180.2022.0444.R3.010623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Precisely determining the aspects related to an instrument's validity and reliability measures allows for greater assurance of the quality of the results.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze the psychometric properties of The Providers Survey in the Brazilian context of mental health services.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>The instrument validation study was conducted in Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The validation study was conducted using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments checklist to analyze its validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A committee of expert judges performed content validation after which the Content Validity Index was calculated. Construct validation took place through Exploratory Factor Analysis using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Test criterion and Bartlett's Sphericity Test. Reliability was verified using test-retest reliability. The significance level adopted for the statistical tests was 5% (P < 0.05). The final instrument comprised 54 questions. The Content Validity Index was 97%. Exploratory Factor Analysis identified a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index of 0.901 and Bartlett's Sphericity Test with P < 0.001. We obtained a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.95 and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.849.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Providers Survey, translated and adapted into Portuguese, was named the Work Assessment Instrument for the Recovery of Mental Health. It presented adequate psychometric properties for evaluating work-related practices for the recovery of psychosocial care network users.</p>","PeriodicalId":49574,"journal":{"name":"Sao Paulo Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10403193/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric properties of the Providers Survey in the Brazilian context of mental health: a validation study.\",\"authors\":\"Mayara Karoline Silva Lacerda, Maria Aparecida Vieira, Fabrine Costa Marques, Juliana Pereira Alves, Matheus Mendes Pereira, Andreia Cristina Feitosa do Carmo, Mark Napoli Costa, Antônio Prates Caldeira, Cristina Andrade Sampaio\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1516-3180.2022.0444.R3.010623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Precisely determining the aspects related to an instrument's validity and reliability measures allows for greater assurance of the quality of the results.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze the psychometric properties of The Providers Survey in the Brazilian context of mental health services.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>The instrument validation study was conducted in Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The validation study was conducted using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments checklist to analyze its validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A committee of expert judges performed content validation after which the Content Validity Index was calculated. Construct validation took place through Exploratory Factor Analysis using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Test criterion and Bartlett's Sphericity Test. Reliability was verified using test-retest reliability. The significance level adopted for the statistical tests was 5% (P < 0.05). The final instrument comprised 54 questions. The Content Validity Index was 97%. Exploratory Factor Analysis identified a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index of 0.901 and Bartlett's Sphericity Test with P < 0.001. We obtained a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.95 and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.849.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Providers Survey, translated and adapted into Portuguese, was named the Work Assessment Instrument for the Recovery of Mental Health. It presented adequate psychometric properties for evaluating work-related practices for the recovery of psychosocial care network users.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sao Paulo Medical Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10403193/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sao Paulo Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2022.0444.R3.010623\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sao Paulo Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2022.0444.R3.010623","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Psychometric properties of the Providers Survey in the Brazilian context of mental health: a validation study.
Background: Precisely determining the aspects related to an instrument's validity and reliability measures allows for greater assurance of the quality of the results.
Objectives: To analyze the psychometric properties of The Providers Survey in the Brazilian context of mental health services.
Design and setting: The instrument validation study was conducted in Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Methods: The validation study was conducted using the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments checklist to analyze its validity and reliability.
Results: A committee of expert judges performed content validation after which the Content Validity Index was calculated. Construct validation took place through Exploratory Factor Analysis using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Test criterion and Bartlett's Sphericity Test. Reliability was verified using test-retest reliability. The significance level adopted for the statistical tests was 5% (P < 0.05). The final instrument comprised 54 questions. The Content Validity Index was 97%. Exploratory Factor Analysis identified a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin index of 0.901 and Bartlett's Sphericity Test with P < 0.001. We obtained a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.95 and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.849.
Conclusions: The Providers Survey, translated and adapted into Portuguese, was named the Work Assessment Instrument for the Recovery of Mental Health. It presented adequate psychometric properties for evaluating work-related practices for the recovery of psychosocial care network users.
期刊介绍：
Published bimonthly by the Associação Paulista de Medicina, the journal accepts articles in the fields of clinical health science (internal medicine, gynecology and obstetrics, mental health, surgery, pediatrics and public health). Articles will be accepted in the form of original articles (clinical trials, cohort, case-control, prevalence, incidence, accuracy and cost-effectiveness studies and systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis), narrative reviews of the literature, case reports, short communications and letters to the editor. Papers with a commercial objective will not be accepted.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
